• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际放射科质量与安全计划调查

An International Survey of Quality and Safety Programs in Radiology.

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Feb;72(1):135-141. doi: 10.1177/0846537119899195. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1177/0846537119899195
PMID:32066249
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the status of radiology quality improvement programs in a variety of selected nations worldwide.

METHODS

A survey was developed by select members of the International Economics Committee of the American College of Radiology on quality programs and was distributed to committee members. Members responded on behalf of their country. The 51-question survey asked about 12 different quality initiatives which were grouped into 4 themes: departments, users, equipment, and outcomes. Respondents reported whether a designated type of quality initiative was used in their country and answered subsequent questions further characterizing it.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% and represented Australia, Canada, China, England, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, Russia, and the United States. The most frequently reported quality initiatives were imaging appropriateness (91.7%) and disease registries (91.7%), followed by key performance indicators (83.3%) and morbidity and mortality rounds (83.3%). Peer review, equipment accreditation, radiation dose monitoring, and structured reporting were reported by 75.0% of respondents, followed by 58.3% of respondents for quality audits and critical incident reporting. The least frequently reported initiatives included Lean/Kaizen exercises and physician performance assessments, implemented by 25.0% of respondents.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable diversity in the quality programs used throughout the world, despite some influence by national and international organizations, from whom further guidance could increase uniformity and optimize patient care in radiology.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定全球多个选定国家的放射学质量改进计划的现状。

方法

由美国放射学院国际经济委员会的部分成员制定了一项关于质量计划的调查,并分发给委员会成员。成员代表他们的国家进行了回复。该 51 个问题的调查询问了 12 种不同的质量举措,这些举措分为 4 个主题:科室、用户、设备和结果。受访者报告了他们所在国家是否使用了指定类型的质量举措,并回答了进一步描述其特征的后续问题。

结果

回复率为 100%,代表了澳大利亚、加拿大、中国、英格兰、法国、德国、印度、以色列、日本、荷兰、俄罗斯和美国。报告最频繁的质量举措是影像学适宜性(91.7%)和疾病登记(91.7%),其次是关键绩效指标(83.3%)和发病率和死亡率轮次(83.3%)。同行评审、设备认证、辐射剂量监测和结构化报告报告率为 75.0%,其次是质量审核和重大事件报告的 58.3%。报告率最低的举措包括精益/改善活动和医生绩效评估,仅 25.0%的受访者实施了这些举措。

结论

尽管受到国家和国际组织的一定影响,但全世界使用的质量计划存在相当大的差异,进一步的指导可以提高放射学中患者护理的一致性和优化。

相似文献

1
An International Survey of Quality and Safety Programs in Radiology.国际放射科质量与安全计划调查
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Feb;72(1):135-141. doi: 10.1177/0846537119899195. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Survey of peer review programs among pediatric radiologists: report from the SPR Quality and Safety Committee.儿科放射科医生同行评审项目调查:SPR质量与安全委员会报告
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Apr;49(4):517-525. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4289-3. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Quality metrics currently used in academic radiology departments: results of the QUALMET survey.目前在学术放射科使用的质量指标:QUALMET 调查结果
Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160827. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160827. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
Program for Supporting Frontline Improvement Projects in an Academic Radiology Department.支持学术放射科一线改进项目的计划。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):235-244. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23421. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
National practice variation in pneumonectomy perioperative care among Canadian thoracic surgeons.加拿大胸外科医生在肺切除术围手术期护理方面的全国性实践差异。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;25(6):872-876. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx252.
6
The economics of quality and safety in radiology: Accreditation programs and landmark legislation.放射医学中的质量和安全经济学:认证计划和具有里程碑意义的立法。
Clin Imaging. 2020 Apr;60(2):260-262. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
"Taking Training to the Next Level": The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey.“将培训提升到新高度”:美国外科医师学会住院医师培训委员会调查
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e95-e105. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
Comparison of national mental health quality assessment programs across the globe.全球各国精神卫生质量评估项目比较。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Oct;63(10):983-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100382.
9
Systematic Review of the Application of Lean and Six Sigma Quality Improvement Methodologies in Radiology.精益和六西格玛质量改进方法在放射学中应用的系统评价
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1088-1095.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
International survey on residency programs in radiology: similarities and differences among 17 countries.国际放射医学住院医师培训项目调查:17 个国家的异同
Clin Imaging. 2021 Nov;79:230-234. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Metrics: A Narrative Review on Unlocking the Power of KPIs in Radiology for Enhanced Precision Medicine.精准指标:关于释放放射学关键绩效指标以推动精准医学发展的叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):963. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090963.
2
A National Quality Improvement Program on Ultrasound Department in China: A Controlled Cohort Study of 1297 Public Hospitals.中国超声科质量改进计划:一项针对 1297 家公立医院的对照队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010397.
3
An introduction to key performance indicators for medical physicists.
医学物理学家关键绩效指标简介。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13718. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13718. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
Contextual Structured Reporting in Radiology: Implementation and Long-Term Evaluation in Improving the Communication of Critical Findings.放射科语境化结构化报告:在提高关键发现沟通方面的实施和长期评估。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jul 28;44(9):148. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01609-3.