University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Feb;72(1):135-141. doi: 10.1177/0846537119899195. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
The aim of this study was to determine the status of radiology quality improvement programs in a variety of selected nations worldwide.
A survey was developed by select members of the International Economics Committee of the American College of Radiology on quality programs and was distributed to committee members. Members responded on behalf of their country. The 51-question survey asked about 12 different quality initiatives which were grouped into 4 themes: departments, users, equipment, and outcomes. Respondents reported whether a designated type of quality initiative was used in their country and answered subsequent questions further characterizing it.
The response rate was 100% and represented Australia, Canada, China, England, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, Russia, and the United States. The most frequently reported quality initiatives were imaging appropriateness (91.7%) and disease registries (91.7%), followed by key performance indicators (83.3%) and morbidity and mortality rounds (83.3%). Peer review, equipment accreditation, radiation dose monitoring, and structured reporting were reported by 75.0% of respondents, followed by 58.3% of respondents for quality audits and critical incident reporting. The least frequently reported initiatives included Lean/Kaizen exercises and physician performance assessments, implemented by 25.0% of respondents.
There is considerable diversity in the quality programs used throughout the world, despite some influence by national and international organizations, from whom further guidance could increase uniformity and optimize patient care in radiology.
本研究旨在确定全球多个选定国家的放射学质量改进计划的现状。
由美国放射学院国际经济委员会的部分成员制定了一项关于质量计划的调查,并分发给委员会成员。成员代表他们的国家进行了回复。该 51 个问题的调查询问了 12 种不同的质量举措,这些举措分为 4 个主题:科室、用户、设备和结果。受访者报告了他们所在国家是否使用了指定类型的质量举措,并回答了进一步描述其特征的后续问题。
回复率为 100%,代表了澳大利亚、加拿大、中国、英格兰、法国、德国、印度、以色列、日本、荷兰、俄罗斯和美国。报告最频繁的质量举措是影像学适宜性(91.7%)和疾病登记(91.7%),其次是关键绩效指标(83.3%)和发病率和死亡率轮次(83.3%)。同行评审、设备认证、辐射剂量监测和结构化报告报告率为 75.0%,其次是质量审核和重大事件报告的 58.3%。报告率最低的举措包括精益/改善活动和医生绩效评估,仅 25.0%的受访者实施了这些举措。
尽管受到国家和国际组织的一定影响,但全世界使用的质量计划存在相当大的差异,进一步的指导可以提高放射学中患者护理的一致性和优化。