Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):475-481. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0788. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
Minimally invasive surgery offers reduced pain and opioid use postoperatively compared with open surgery, but large-scale comparative studies are lacking. We assessed the incidence of persistent opioid use after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We performed a retrospective claims database cohort study of opioid-naive (i.e., no opioid prescriptions 30-180 days before index surgery) adult males who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer from July 2013 to June 2017. For patients who filled a perioperative opioid prescription (30 days before to 14 days after surgery), we calculated the incidence of new persistent postoperative opioid use (≥1 prescription 90-180 days after surgery). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between the surgical approach, patient risk factors, and persistent opioid use. Twelve thousand two hundred seventy-eight radical prostatectomy patients filled an opioid prescription perioperatively (1510 [12%] open and 10,768 [88%] robot assisted). Of these, 846 (6.9%) patients continued to fill opioid prescription(s) 90 to 180 days after surgery. Patients undergoing RARP were 35% less likely to develop new persistent opioid use compared with those undergoing open radical prostatectomy (6.5% 9.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.54, 0.79). Other independent risk factors included living in the southern, western, or north central United States; preoperative comorbidity; and tobacco use. Approximately 6.9% of opioid-naive patients continued to fill opioid prescriptions 90 days after radical prostatectomy. The risk of persistent opioid use was significantly lower among patients undergoing a robot-assisted open approach. Further efforts are needed to develop postoperative opioid prescription protocols for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
微创手术与开放性手术相比,术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用减少,但缺乏大规模的比较研究。我们评估了开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后持续性阿片类药物使用的发生率。我们对 2013 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月期间因前列腺癌接受根治性前列腺切除术的阿片类药物初治(即手术前 30-180 天无阿片类药物处方)的成年男性进行了回顾性索赔数据库队列研究。对于服用围手术期阿片类药物处方的患者(手术前 30 天至手术后 14 天),我们计算了新的持续性术后阿片类药物使用(手术后 90-180 天至少 1 次处方)的发生率。多变量逻辑回归用于研究手术方法、患者危险因素与持续性阿片类药物使用之间的关系。12278 例接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者在围手术期服用阿片类药物处方(1510 例开放性手术,10768 例机器人辅助手术)。其中 846 例(6.9%)患者在手术后 90 至 180 天继续服用阿片类药物处方。与开放性根治性前列腺切除术相比,接受 RARP 的患者发生新的持续性阿片类药物使用的可能性降低 35%(6.5%比 9.7%;调整后的优势比 0.65;95%置信区间 0.54,0.79)。其他独立危险因素包括居住在美国南部、西部或中北部;术前合并症;和吸烟。大约 6.9%的阿片类药物初治患者在根治性前列腺切除术后 90 天继续服用阿片类药物处方。与开放性手术相比,机器人辅助手术的持续性阿片类药物使用风险显著降低。需要进一步努力为接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者制定术后阿片类药物处方方案。