Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00154, Rome, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 17;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01284-5.
Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) claimed PUFAs to be effective for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) but international guidelines have not considered yet this body of evidence. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of PUFAs in children and adolescents with ASD, for the Italian national guidelines on the management of ASD in children and adolescents.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing PUFAs versus placebo or a healthy diet for the treatment of ASD in children and adolescents. The outcomes considered were deemed by the guideline panel to be highly relevant to children and adolescents with ASD and to their caregivers. The outcomes included hyperactivity, quality of sleep, self-harm, aggression, irritability, anxiety, attention, adaptive functioning, social interaction, restricted and repetitive interests and behavior, communication, hyperactivity and disruptive behaviors coexistent with core symptoms. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane tool, and the rating of the confidence in the effect estimates according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
We included 9 studies with 405 participants. The strength of evidence ranged from low to very low. Six studies included preschoolers and school-age children, three studies included both children and adolescents. The majority of participants were males (83.8%), with a mean age of 6.7 years. PUFAs were superior compared to placebo in reducing anxiety in individuals with ASD (SMD -1.01, 95% CI - 1.86 to - 0.17; very low certainty of evidence). Moreover, PUFAs worsened quality of sleep compared to a healthy diet (SMD 1.11, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.00; very low certainty of evidence). PUFAs were not better than placebo in reducing aggression, hyperactivity, adaptive functioning, irritability, restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors and communication. Effects on some critical outcomes such as sleep, self-harm and disruptive behavior are currently unknown. The main limitations were the small number of participants included in the RCTs and the dosage which varied greatly (from 200 mg/day to 1540 mg/day), making it difficult to address causal inference.
PUFAs did not show evidence of effect in children and adolescents with ASD and the certainty of evidence as measured with the GRADE was low to very low. Further research is needed on this topic because the available evidence is inconclusive.
最近的随机对照试验(RCT)声称多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)有效,但国际指南尚未考虑这一证据。我们的目的是评估 PUFAs 对 ASD 儿童和青少年的有效性,为意大利儿童和青少年 ASD 管理的国家指南提供依据。
我们对 RCT 进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了 PUFAs 与安慰剂或健康饮食治疗 ASD 儿童和青少年的效果。指南小组认为这些结果与 ASD 儿童和青少年及其照顾者高度相关。这些结果包括多动、睡眠质量、自残、攻击行为、易怒、焦虑、注意力、适应功能、社交互动、受限和重复的兴趣和行为、沟通、多动和与核心症状并存的破坏性行为。使用 Cochrane 工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,并根据 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE)方法评估效应估计的置信度评级。
我们纳入了 9 项研究,共 405 名参与者。证据强度从低到极低不等。6 项研究纳入了学龄前儿童和学龄儿童,3 项研究同时纳入了儿童和青少年。大多数参与者为男性(83.8%),平均年龄为 6.7 岁。与安慰剂相比,PUFAs 可降低 ASD 个体的焦虑(SMD-1.01,95%CI-1.86 至-0.17;证据确定性极低)。此外,与健康饮食相比,PUFAs 会降低睡眠质量(SMD 1.11,95%CI 0.21 至 2.00;证据确定性极低)。与安慰剂相比,PUFAs 在降低攻击行为、多动、适应功能、易怒、受限和重复的兴趣和行为以及沟通方面并无优势。目前尚不清楚一些关键结果(如睡眠、自残和破坏性行为)的效果。主要限制是 RCT 中纳入的参与者数量较少,剂量差异很大(从 200mg/天到 1540mg/天),难以确定因果关系。
PUFAs 对 ASD 儿童和青少年没有显示出疗效证据,GRADE 测量的证据确定性为低到极低。需要进一步研究这个问题,因为现有证据尚无定论。