Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil.
Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Health Data Research, London, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):618-627. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30624-3. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Indirect financial costs and barriers to health-care access might contribute to leprosy treatment non-adherence. We estimated the association of the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme, the Programa Bolsa Família (PBF), on leprosy treatment adherence and cure in patients in Brazil.
In this quasi-experimental study, we linked baseline demographic and socioeconomic information for individuals who entered the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort between Jan 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2014, with the PBF payroll database and the Information System for Notifiable Diseases, which includes nationwide leprosy registries. Individuals were eligible for inclusion if they had a household member older than 15 years and had not received PBF aid or been diagnosed with leprosy before entering the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort; they were excluded if they were partial receivers of PBF benefits, had missing data, or had a monthly per-capita income greater than BRL200 (US$50). Individuals who were PBF beneficiaries before leprosy diagnosis were matched to those who were not beneficiaries through propensity-score matching (1:1) with replacement on the basis of baseline covariates, including sex, age, race or ethnicity, education, work, income, place of residence, and household characteristics. We used logistic regression to assess the average treatment effect on the treated of receipt of PBF benefits on leprosy treatment adherence (six or more multidrug therapy doses for paucibacillary cases or 12 or more doses for multibacillary cases) and cure in individuals of all ages. We stratified our analysis according to operational disease classification (paucibacillary or multibacillary). We also did a subgroup analysis of paediatric leprosy restricted to children aged up to 15 years.
We included 11 456 new leprosy cases, of whom 8750 (76·3%) had received PBF before diagnosis and 2706 (23·6%) had not. Overall, 9508 (83·0%) patients adhered to treatment and 10 077 (88·0%) were cured. After propensity score matching, receiving PBF before diagnosis was associated with adherence to treatment (OR 1·22, 95% CI 1·01-1·48) and cure (1·26, 1·01-1·58). PBF receipt did not significantly improve treatment adherence (1·37, 0·98-1·91) or cure (1·12, 0·75-1·67) in patients with paucibacillary leprosy. For patients with multibacillary disease, PBF beneficiaries had better treatment adherence (1·37, 1·08-1·74) and cure (1·43, 1·09-1·90) than non-beneficiaries. In the propensity score-matched analysis in 2654 children younger than 15 years with leprosy, PBF exposure was not associated with leprosy treatment adherence (1·55, 0·89-2·68) or cure (1·57, 0·83-2·97).
Our results suggest that being a beneficiary of the PBF, which facilitates cash transfers and improved access to health care, is associated with greater leprosy multidrug therapy adherence and cure in multibacillary cases. These results are especially relevant for patients with multibacillary disease, who are treated for a longer period and have lower cure rates than those with paucibacillary disease.
CONFAP/ESRC/MRC/BBSRC/CNPq/FAPDF-Doenças Negligenciadas, the UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brazil (CAPES).
间接的经济成本和医疗保健获取障碍可能导致麻风病治疗不依从。我们评估了巴西有条件现金转移计划——家庭补助金计划(PBF)对巴西患者麻风病治疗依从性和治愈率的影响。
在这项准实验研究中,我们将 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间进入 1 亿巴西队列的个体的基线人口统计学和社会经济信息与 PBF 工资单数据库和传染病报告系统(包括全国麻风病登记册)进行了关联。如果个体的家庭中有 15 岁以上的成员,且在进入 1 亿巴西队列前没有接受过 PBF 援助或被诊断患有麻风病,则有资格纳入;如果个体是 PBF 部分受益人的、有缺失数据的、或月人均收入大于 200 雷亚尔(50 美元)的,则排除在外。在麻风病诊断前是 PBF 受益人的个体,通过基于基线协变量(包括性别、年龄、种族或民族、教育、工作、收入、居住地和家庭特征)的倾向评分匹配(1:1)与非受益个体进行匹配。我们使用逻辑回归来评估接受 PBF 福利对所有年龄段个体的麻风病治疗依从性(多药疗法剂量为 6 剂或以上的少菌型病例,或 12 剂或以上的多菌型病例)和治愈率的平均处理效应。我们根据操作疾病分类(少菌型或多菌型)对分析进行分层。我们还对限于 15 岁以下儿童的儿科麻风病进行了亚组分析。
我们纳入了 11456 例新的麻风病病例,其中 8750 例(76.3%)在诊断前接受了 PBF,2706 例(23.6%)没有。总体而言,9508 例(83.0%)患者依从治疗,10077 例(88.0%)治愈。在倾向评分匹配后,诊断前接受 PBF 与治疗依从性(比值比 1.22,95%CI 1.01-1.48)和治愈率(1.26,1.01-1.58)相关。在少菌型麻风病患者中,PBF 收益并没有显著改善治疗依从性(1.37,0.98-1.91)或治愈率(1.12,0.75-1.67)。对于多菌型疾病患者,PBF 受益人的治疗依从性(1.37,1.08-1.74)和治愈率(1.43,1.09-1.90)优于非受益个体。在 2654 例年龄小于 15 岁的麻风病患儿的倾向评分匹配分析中,PBF 暴露与麻风病治疗依从性(1.55,0.89-2.68)或治愈率(1.57,0.83-2.97)无关。
我们的结果表明,作为 PBF 的受益人,这促进了现金转移和改善了医疗保健的可及性,与多菌型麻风病的多药治疗依从性和治愈率的提高相关。这些结果对于多菌型疾病患者尤其重要,因为他们的治疗时间更长,治愈率低于少菌型疾病患者。
巴西淡化疾病合作研究基金会/经济与社会研究理事会/医学研究理事会/生物技术与生物科学研究理事会/巴西国家科学与技术发展委员会/巴西家庭补助金计划(CONFAP/ESRC/MRC/BBSRC/CNPq/FAPDF-被忽视的疾病)、英国医学研究理事会、惠康信托基金会和巴西高级研究人员协调理事会(CAPES)。