• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从患者角度看门诊护理中的患者安全:回顾性、代表性电话调查。

Patient safety in ambulatory care from the patient's perspective: a retrospective, representative telephone survey.

机构信息

Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e034617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034617.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034617
PMID:32066609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7044884/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data on patient safety problems (PSPs) in ambulatory care are scarce. The aim of the study was to record the frequency, type, severity and point of origin of PSPs in ambulatory care in Germany.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Computer-assisted telephone interviews with randomly recruited citizens aged ≥40 years in Germany who were asked about their experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care.

PARTICIPANTS

10 037 citizens ≥40 years.

MEASURES

A new questionnaire was developed to record patient experiences with PSPs in ambulatory care. The study reported here targets patient experiences in the last 12 months. The questionnaire focuses on PSPs in seven areas of medical treatment: anamnesis/diagnostic procedures; medication; vaccination, injection, infusion; aftercare; outpatient surgery; office administration; other areas. For each PSP reported, detailed questions were asked about the specialist group concerned, and, on the most serious harm, the severity of the harm and its consequences. The target parameters are presented as proportions with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

1422 of the respondents (14%) reported 2589 PSPs. The areas most frequently affected by PSPs were anamnesis/diagnostic procedures (61%) and medication (15%). General practitioners accounted for 44% of PSPs, orthopaedists for 15% and internists for 10%. 75% of PSPs were associated with harm, especially unnecessarily prolonged pain or deterioration of health; 35% of PSPs led to permanent harm. 804 PSPs (32%) prompted patients to see another doctor for additional treatment; 255 PSPs (10%) required inpatient treatment.

CONCLUSION

PSPs experienced by patients are widespread in ambulatory care in Germany. The study reveals in which areas of medical treatment efforts to prevent PSPs could make the greatest contribution to improving patient safety. It also demonstrates the valuable contribution of patient reports to the analysis of PSPs.

摘要

目的

门诊护理中患者安全问题(PSPs)的数据很少。本研究的目的是记录德国门诊护理中 PSP 的频率、类型、严重程度和起源点。

设计

回顾性横断面研究。

设置

在德国,通过计算机辅助电话采访随机招募的≥40 岁公民,询问他们在门诊护理中经历过的 PSP。

参与者

10037 名≥40 岁的公民。

措施

开发了一个新的问卷来记录门诊护理中患者的 PSP 体验。本研究报告的重点是过去 12 个月内患者的体验。该问卷侧重于七个医疗领域的 PSP:病史/诊断程序;药物治疗;疫苗接种、注射、输液;随访;门诊手术;办公室管理;其他领域。对于报告的每一个 PSP,都详细询问了有关专科小组的问题,对于最严重的伤害,还询问了伤害的严重程度及其后果。目标参数以 95%置信区间的比例表示。

结果

1422 名受访者(14%)报告了 2589 起 PSP。受 PSP 影响最严重的领域是病史/诊断程序(61%)和药物治疗(15%)。全科医生占 PSP 的 44%,骨科医生占 15%,内科医生占 10%。75%的 PSP 与伤害有关,尤其是不必要的持续疼痛或健康恶化;35%的 PSP 导致永久性伤害。804 例 PSP(32%)促使患者寻求其他医生进行额外治疗;255 例 PSP(10%)需要住院治疗。

结论

德国门诊护理中患者经历的 PSP 很普遍。该研究揭示了在哪些治疗领域努力预防 PSP 可以为提高患者安全性做出最大贡献。它还证明了患者报告对 PSP 分析的宝贵贡献。

相似文献

1
Patient safety in ambulatory care from the patient's perspective: a retrospective, representative telephone survey.从患者角度看门诊护理中的患者安全:回顾性、代表性电话调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e034617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034617.
2
[Patient safety in ambulatory care: Development and application of a CATI questionnaire (PSP-AMB) to capture patient safety problems from the perspective of patients aged 40 years and older].[门诊医疗中的患者安全:开发和应用计算机辅助电话调查问卷(PSP-AMB)以从40岁及以上患者的角度捕捉患者安全问题]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Feb;160:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
3
How do patients respond to safety problems in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective cross-sectional telephone survey.患者如何应对门诊护理中的安全问题?回顾性横断面电话调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e052973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052973.
4
Regional variations of perceived problems in ambulatory care from the perspective of general practitioners and their patients - an exploratory focus group study in urban and rural regions of northern Germany.从全科医生及其患者的角度看门诊医疗中感知到的问题的区域差异——德国北部城乡地区的一项探索性焦点小组研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 25;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0637-x.
5
The Impact of Patient Support Programs on Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies of Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Germany: A Non-Interventional, Prospective Study.德国复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的患者支持计划对疾病修正治疗依从性的影响:一项非干预性、前瞻性研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2999-3009. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01349-3. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
6
[Patient safety in general practice].[全科医疗中的患者安全]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
7
[Statutory ambulatory medical care through the eyes of the health insurance beneficiaries--methods and results of the 2006 NASHIP Health Insurance Beneficiary survey: care utilisation, primary care, and emergency medical services].[从健康保险受益人的视角看法定门诊医疗——2006年全国健康保险计划(NASHIP)健康保险受益人调查的方法与结果:医疗服务利用、初级保健及紧急医疗服务]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Feb;71(2):94-101. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102939. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
8
[Patient perspectives on patient safety: Results of a population-based survey in Germany].[患者对患者安全的看法:德国一项基于人群的调查结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Oct;165:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
ASK ME!-Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey.在门诊护理中测量患者对患者安全的体验:一种混合模式调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259252. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in public perceptions of patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a repeated cross-sectional survey in Germany, 2019-2023.2019 - 2023年德国重复横断面调查结果:新冠疫情期间公众对患者安全认知的趋势
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329761. eCollection 2025.
2
Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM.用于卓越诊断患者报告测量的单次问诊引出框架:SEE-Dx-PRM。
PEC Innov. 2024 Nov 17;5:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100357. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
3
Achieving Diagnostic Excellence: Roadmaps to Develop and Use Patient-Reported Measures With an Equity Lens.实现诊断卓越:制定和使用具有公平视角的患者报告衡量指标的路线图。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8048. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8048. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
4
Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development.用于诊断卓越的患者报告结局和体验领域:一项范围综述,旨在为未来的测量工具开发提供信息。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2883-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
5
'Development and psychometric evaluation of the safety feeling scale in adult patients at hospital: Exploratory sequential mixed method'.《成人住院患者安全感量表的编制及心理测量学评价:探索性序贯混合方法》
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6165-6174. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1850. Epub 2023 May 28.
6
Patient Safety and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Repeated Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.德国的患者安全与 COVID-19 大流行:一项重复的基于人群的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010112.
7
Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire.评估初级保健中患者对患者安全的体验:ASK-ME 问卷的制定和验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e049237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049237.
8
ASK ME!-Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey.在门诊护理中测量患者对患者安全的体验:一种混合模式调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259252. eCollection 2021.
9
How do patients respond to safety problems in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective cross-sectional telephone survey.患者如何应对门诊护理中的安全问题?回顾性横断面电话调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e052973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052973.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Engagement In Health Care Safety: An Overview Of Mixed-Quality Evidence.患者参与医疗安全:混合质量证据概述。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1813-1820. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0716.
2
Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.从患者角度看临床医生审查下初级保健中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质:英国的一项基于人群的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):e020952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952.
3
Patient safety incidents are common in primary care: A national prospective active incident reporting survey.患者安全事件在初级医疗保健中很常见:一项全国性前瞻性主动事件报告调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0165455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165455. eCollection 2017.
4
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the "Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care" (PREOS-PC).初级保健中患者安全的测量:“初级保健患者报告的安全体验与结果”(PREOS-PC)的开发与验证
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):253-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1935.
5
Patients' views of adverse events in primary and ambulatory care: a systematic review to assess methods and the content of what patients consider to be adverse events.患者对基层医疗和门诊医疗中不良事件的看法:一项评估方法及患者所认为不良事件内容的系统综述
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jan 27;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0408-0.
6
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.初级保健有多安全?一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):544-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004178. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Can staff and patient perspectives on hospital safety predict harm-free care? An analysis of staff and patient survey data and routinely collected outcomes.医护人员和患者对医院安全的看法能否预测无伤害护理?对医护人员和患者调查数据以及常规收集结果的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jun;24(6):369-76. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003691. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
Patient safety in primary care: incident reporting and significant event reviews in British general practice.基层医疗中的患者安全:英国全科医疗中的事件报告与重大事件审查
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Jul;24(4):411-9. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12221. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Frequency of and harm associated with primary care safety incidents.初级保健安全事件的发生频率及相关危害。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep 1;18(9):e323-37.
10
Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review.患者能否在医院环境中报告患者安全事件?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):685-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000213. Epub 2012 May 5.