Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Suite 643, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2883-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
"Diagnostic excellence," as a relatively new construct centered on the diagnostic process and its health-related outcomes, can be refined by patient reporting and its measurement. We aimed to explore the scope of patient-reported outcome (PRO) and patient-reported experience (PRE) domains that are diagnostically relevant, regardless of the future diagnosed condition, and to review the state of measurement of these patient-reported domains.
We conducted an exploratory analysis to identify these domains by employing a scoping review supplemented with internal expert consultations, 24-member international expert convening, additional environmental scans, and the validation of the domains' diagnostic relevance via mapping these onto patient diagnostic journeys. We created a narrative bibliography of the domains illustrating them with existing measurement examples.
We identified 41 diagnostically relevant PRO and PRE domains. We classified 10 domains as PRO, 28 as PRE, and three as mixed PRO/PRE. Among these domains, 19 were captured in existing instruments, and 20 were captured only in qualitative studies. Two domains were conceptualized during this exploratory analysis with no examples identified of capturing these domains. For 27 domains, patients and care partners report on a specific encounter; for 14 domains, reporting relates to an entire diagnostic journey over time, which presents particular measurement opportunities and challenges.
The multitude of PRO and PRE domains, if measured rigorously, would allow the diagnostic excellence construct to evolve further and in a manner that is patient-centered, prospectively focused, and concentrates on effectiveness and efficiency of diagnostic care on patients' well-being.
“诊断卓越”是一个相对较新的概念,其中心是诊断过程及其与健康相关的结果,可以通过患者报告及其测量来完善。我们旨在探索与诊断相关的患者报告结局(PRO)和患者报告体验(PRE)领域的范围,而不考虑未来的诊断情况,并审查这些患者报告领域的测量现状。
我们通过采用范围综述辅以内部专家咨询、24 名国际专家会议、额外的环境扫描,并通过将这些领域映射到患者的诊断旅程上来验证其诊断相关性,来确定这些领域。我们创建了一个包含这些领域的叙述性文献目录,并通过现有测量示例来说明这些领域。
我们确定了 41 个与诊断相关的 PRO 和 PRE 领域。我们将 10 个领域分类为 PRO,28 个为 PRE,3 个为混合 PRO/PRE。在这些领域中,有 19 个在现有工具中被捕获,有 20 个仅在定性研究中被捕获。在这个探索性分析中,有两个领域被概念化,没有发现捕获这些领域的示例。对于 27 个领域,患者和护理伙伴报告了特定的就诊经历;对于 14 个领域,报告涉及随着时间的推移整个诊断过程,这提出了特定的测量机会和挑战。
如果严格测量众多的 PRO 和 PRE 领域,将使诊断卓越的概念进一步发展,并以患者为中心、前瞻性关注、注重诊断护理对患者福祉的有效性和效率。