• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从愈创木脂粪便潜血检测转换至粪便免疫化学检测的获益:来自瓦隆-布鲁塞尔结直肠癌筛查项目的经验。

Benefits of switching from guaiac-based faecal occult blood to faecal immunochemical testing: experience from the Wallonia-Brussels colorectal cancer screening programme.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(7):1109-1117. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0754-5. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-020-0754-5
PMID:32066910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7109124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have replaced guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBTs) in several colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of this transition based on the Wallonia-Brussels-organised CRC screening programme.

METHODS

A total of 1,569,868 individuals aged 50-74 years, who were invited to screening during 2009-2017, were studied by linking their screening records with insurance, pathology and cancer data in the Belgian Cancer Registry. We compared neoplasm detection rates and positive predictive values (PPVs) of gFOBT and FIT at 15 µg haemoglobin per gram cut-off in screen-naive individuals. We furthermore examined the incidence rates of interval cancer in gFOBT- and FIT-based screening programme.

RESULTS

Advanced neoplasms were detected less frequently by gFOBT (0.8%) than by FIT (1.3%), with a difference of 0.5% (P < 0.01). PPVs were lower for gFOBT (15.1%) than for FIT (21.7%) for advanced neoplasms (difference 6.6%, P < 0.01). Compared to participants with negative gFOBT, those with negative FIT were 77% less likely to develop interval cancer (incidence rate ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.33).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that in an organised CRC screening programme, replacing gFOBT with FIT improved neoplasm detection rate and substantially reduced interval cancer incidence.

摘要

背景

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)已在多个结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划中取代了愈创木脂粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)。我们旨在根据瓦隆-布鲁塞尔组织的 CRC 筛查计划评估这种转变的益处。

方法

共有 1569868 名年龄在 50-74 岁之间的个体在 2009-2017 年期间受邀参加筛查,通过将他们的筛查记录与比利时癌症登记处的保险、病理学和癌症数据相链接进行研究。我们比较了 gFOBT 和 FIT 在 15µg 血红蛋白/克截止值下在筛查初筛个体中的肿瘤检出率和阳性预测值(PPV)。此外,我们还检查了 gFOBT 和 FIT 为基础的筛查计划中间隔期癌症的发病率。

结果

高级别肿瘤通过 gFOBT(0.8%)的检出率低于 FIT(1.3%),差异为 0.5%(P<0.01)。对于高级别肿瘤,gFOBT 的 PPV(15.1%)低于 FIT(21.7%),差异为 6.6%(P<0.01)。与 gFOBT 阴性的参与者相比,FIT 阴性的参与者发生间隔期癌症的风险低 77%(发病率比 0.23,95%置信区间 0.16-0.33)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在有组织的 CRC 筛查计划中,用 FIT 替代 gFOBT 提高了肿瘤检出率,并大大降低了间隔期癌症的发病率。

相似文献

1
Benefits of switching from guaiac-based faecal occult blood to faecal immunochemical testing: experience from the Wallonia-Brussels colorectal cancer screening programme.从愈创木脂粪便潜血检测转换至粪便免疫化学检测的获益:来自瓦隆-布鲁塞尔结直肠癌筛查项目的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(7):1109-1117. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0754-5. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.粪便免疫化学试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验:临床医生和结直肠癌筛查计划组织者需要了解的内容。
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
4
Switching from guaiac to immunochemical faecal occult blood test increases participation and diagnostic yield of colorectal cancer screening.从愈创木脂检测切换至免疫化学粪便隐血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率和诊断率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Oct;51(10):1461-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.在一项 2235 名筛查结肠镜参与者的头对头比较中,粪便免疫化学试验检测血红蛋白的诊断性能优于愈创木脂粪便隐血试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(14):3049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
Incidence of faecal occult blood test interval cancers in population-based colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中粪便潜血试验间隔期癌症的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gut. 2019 May;68(5):873-881. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315340. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate.基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查中性别特异性截止值:更高的依从性和相等的阳性率。
J Med Screen. 2019 Jun;26(2):92-97. doi: 10.1177/0969141318804843. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
Significant decrease in interval colorectal cancer incidence after implementing immunochemical testing in a multiple-round guaiac-based screening programme.免疫化学检测在基于愈创木脂的多轮筛查项目中实施后,结直肠癌间隔期发病率显著下降。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(11):1494-1502. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01546-z. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查项目中,与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验相比,不同阳性阈值下粪便免疫化学检测的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e017186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017186.
10
Impact of changing from a guaiac faecal occult blood test to a faecal immunochemical test in a national screening programme: Results from a pilot study within the national bowel cancer screening programme in England.在全国范围内的筛查项目中,从愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(guaiac faecal occult blood test)转变为粪便免疫化学试验(faecal immunochemical test)的影响:英格兰全国肠癌筛查项目内的一项试点研究结果。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):426-432. doi: 10.1177/09691413211013376. Epub 2021 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Interval Cancer in Population-Based Colorectal Screening Programmes: Incidence and Characteristics of Tumours.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目中的间期癌:肿瘤的发病率及特征
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 13;16(4):769. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040769.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities?欧洲结直肠癌筛查成本效益分析的系统评价:研究是否纳入了最佳筛查强度?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Sep;21(5):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
How Can the EU Beating Cancer Plan Help in Tackling Lung Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer and Melanoma?

本文引用的文献

1
Parameters influencing the quality of colonoscopy in Belgium : a critical evaluation.影响比利时结肠镜检查质量的参数:一项批判性评估。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Jan-Mar;81(1):29-38.
欧盟的“战胜癌症计划”如何助力应对肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和黑色素瘤?
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(9):1618. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091618.
4
CRISPR/Cas13-Based Platforms for a Potential Next-Generation Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer through Exosomes Micro-RNA Detection: A Review.基于CRISPR/Cas13平台通过外泌体微小RNA检测实现结直肠癌潜在下一代诊断的综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;13(18):4640. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184640.