Rennes 1 University, 35000, Rennes, France.
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 35033, Rennes, France.
Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(11):1494-1502. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01546-z. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
We aimed to evaluate the effects of switching to faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) on the cumulative 2-year incidence rate of interval cancers, interval cancer rate and test sensitivity within a mature population-based colorectal cancer screening programme consisting of six rounds of biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBT).
The FIT results were compared with those of gFOBT used in each of the previous two rounds. For the three rounds analysed, 279,041 tests were performed by 156,186 individuals. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine interval cancer risk factors (Poisson regression) and to compare the sensitivity of FIT to gFOBT.
There were 612 cases of screen-detected cancers and 209 cases of interval cancers. The sex- and age-adjusted cumulative 2-year incidence rates of interval cancers were 55.7 (95% CI, 45.3-68.5), 42.4 (95% CI, 32.6-55.2) and 15.8 (95% CI, 10.9-22.8) per 100,000 person-years after the last two rounds of gFOBT and FIT, respectively. The FIT/gFOBT incidence rate ratio was 0.38 [95% CI, 0.27-0.54] (P < 0.001). Sex- and age-adjusted sensitivity was significantly higher with FIT than with gFOBT (OR = 6.70 [95% CI, 4.48-10.01], P < 0.0001).
This population-based study revealed a dramatic decrease in the cumulative incidence rates of interval cancers after switching from gFOBT to FIT. These data provide an additional incentive for countries still using gFOBT to switch to FIT.
我们旨在评估在一个成熟的基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中,从粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)转换对 2 年内累积间隔癌发生率、间隔癌发生率和检测敏感性的影响,该计划由六轮每两年一次的愈创木脂粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)组成。
将 FIT 结果与前两轮使用的 gFOBT 结果进行比较。在分析的三回合中,共有 156186 人进行了 279041 次检测。使用逻辑回归分析确定间隔癌的危险因素(泊松回归),并比较 FIT 与 gFOBT 的敏感性。
共有 612 例筛查发现的癌症和 209 例间隔癌。在最后两轮 gFOBT 和 FIT 后,每 10 万人年的性别和年龄调整的 2 年累积间隔癌发生率分别为 55.7(95%可信区间,45.3-68.5)、42.4(95%可信区间,32.6-55.2)和 15.8(95%可信区间,10.9-22.8)。FIT/gFOBT 发病率比为 0.38(95%可信区间,0.27-0.54)(P<0.001)。与 gFOBT 相比,FIT 的性别和年龄调整后的敏感性显著更高(比值比=6.70,95%可信区间,4.48-10.01)(P<0.0001)。
本基于人群的研究显示,从 gFOBT 转换为 FIT 后,间隔癌的累积发生率显著下降。这些数据为仍在使用 gFOBT 的国家提供了改用 FIT 的额外动力。