• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两年的随访数据表明,微创肺表面活性物质治疗(LISA)是安全的。这是一项随机对照 AMV(避免机械通气)研究的随访结果。

Two-year outcome data suggest that less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is safe. Results from the follow-up of the randomized controlled AMV (avoid mechanical ventilation) study.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Neonatology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;179(8):1309-1313. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03572-0. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-020-03572-0
PMID:32067100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7351829/
Abstract

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a method to deliver surfactant to spontaneously breathing premature infants via a thin catheter. Here we report the two-year outcome from the AMV (avoid mechanical ventilation) study, the first randomized controlled trial on this mode of surfactant delivery. No statistically significant differences in weight, length or neurodevelopmental outcome (Bayley II scores) were found between the LISA intervention group (n = 95) and the control group (n = 84) that received standard treatment.Conclusion: No differences in outcome were observed at 2 years. LISA seems safe in that aspect. What is Known: • LISA is a method that is in increasing use for surfactant delivery to spontaneously breathing infants. LISA reduces the need for mechanical ventilation. What is New: • Outcome data at 2 years from the first randomized study with LISA raise no safety concerns in comparison to a group of infants that received standard treatment.

摘要

经鼻给予表面活性物质(LISA)是一种通过细导管将表面活性物质递送给自主呼吸早产儿的方法。在此,我们报告 AMV(避免机械通气)研究的两年结果,这是关于这种表面活性物质递送方式的首个随机对照试验。在 LISA 干预组(n=95)和接受标准治疗的对照组(n=84)之间,体重、身高或神经发育结局(贝利 II 评分)均无统计学显著差异。结论:2 年时观察到的结局无差异。在这方面,LISA 似乎是安全的。已知:•LISA 是一种越来越多地用于向自主呼吸婴儿递送表面活性物质的方法。LISA 减少了对机械通气的需求。新内容:•与接受标准治疗的一组婴儿相比,来自首例 LISA 随机研究的 2 年结局数据没有安全性问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7efa/7351829/27fd395daec5/431_2020_3572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7efa/7351829/27fd395daec5/431_2020_3572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7efa/7351829/27fd395daec5/431_2020_3572_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Two-year outcome data suggest that less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is safe. Results from the follow-up of the randomized controlled AMV (avoid mechanical ventilation) study.两年的随访数据表明,微创肺表面活性物质治疗(LISA)是安全的。这是一项随机对照 AMV(避免机械通气)研究的随访结果。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;179(8):1309-1313. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03572-0. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
3
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
4
Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) - ways to deliver surfactant in spontaneously breathing infants.经自然呼吸的婴儿给予较少侵入性表面活性剂治疗(LISA)- 给予表面活性剂的方法。
Early Hum Dev. 2013 Nov;89(11):875-80. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.
6
Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions.经鼻或经气管给予表面活性剂:最佳实践和未解决的问题。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Apr;32(2):228-234. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000878.
7
Evaluation of a respiratory care protocol including less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants.评估包括经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸管理方案
Pediatr Res. 2024 May;95(6):1603-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02963-x. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
8
Surfactant administration methods for premature newborns: LISA vs. INSURE comparative analysis.表面活性物质给药方法用于早产儿:LISA 与 INSURE 比较分析。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024;17(2):233-239. doi: 10.3233/NPM-230194.
9
Comparison of "IN-REC-SUR-E" and LISA in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial (IN-REC-LISA trial).“IN-REC-SUR-E”与 LISA 在呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿中的比较:一项随机对照试验(IN-REC-LISA 试验)。
Trials. 2024 Jul 2;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08240-4.
10
Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非插管表面活性剂应用与常规治疗在极早产儿中的对比:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):723-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in practice of less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in United Kingdom neonatal units.英国新生儿病房微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)实践的变化
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Feb;114(2):393-397. doi: 10.1111/apa.17446. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art.经鼻给予早产儿表面活性物质治疗——最新进展。
Neonatology. 2024;121(5):584-595. doi: 10.1159/000540078. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Compared to Intubation, Surfactant, Rapid Extubation Method in Preterm Neonates: An Umbrella Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Surfactant Administration via Thin Catheter: A Practical Guide.经细导管给予表面活性剂:实用指南。
Neonatology. 2019;116(3):211-226. doi: 10.1159/000502610. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA): chances and limitations.经鼻给予表面活性物质(LISA):机会与限制。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F655-F659. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316557. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南-2019 更新版。
与气管内插管、表面活性剂、早产儿快速拔管方法相比,微创表面活性剂给药:伞式评价。
Neonatology. 2024;121(4):485-493. doi: 10.1159/000537903. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Delivery room intubation and neurodevelopment among extremely preterm infants.产房内插管与极早产儿的神经发育。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jun;95(7):1897-1902. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02993-5. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Less invasive surfactant administration methods: Who, what and how.更微创的表面活性物质给药方法:谁、什么和如何。
J Perinatol. 2024 Apr;44(4):472-477. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01778-2. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Neonatal respiratory support strategies-short and long-term respiratory outcomes.新生儿呼吸支持策略——短期和长期呼吸结局
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 26;11:1212074. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1212074. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical decision thresholds for surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.早产儿表面活性剂给药的临床决策阈值:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 20;62:102097. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102097. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Prevention of Chronic Morbidities in Extremely Premature Newborns with LISA-nCPAP Respiratory Therapy and Adjuvant Perinatal Strategies.采用 LISA-nCPAP 呼吸治疗及辅助围产期策略预防极早早产儿的慢性疾病
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 May 24;12(6):1149. doi: 10.3390/antiox12061149.
9
Surfactant delivery via thin catheter in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经细导管向早产儿递送表面活性剂:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284792. eCollection 2023.
10
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南:2022 年更新版。
Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3-23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Three-year perinatal outcomes of less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者中应用 less invasive beractant 治疗的 3 年围产期结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2704-2710. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1557633. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants born over the past decade: a meta-analytic review.过去十年中早产极低体重儿的神经发育结局:一项荟萃分析综述。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Apr;60(4):342-355. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13675. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
6
Review demonstrates that less invasive surfactant administration in preterm neonates leads to fewer complications.研究表明,对早产儿进行侵入性较小的表面活性剂给药可减少并发症。
Acta Paediatr. 2018 May;107(5):736-743. doi: 10.1111/apa.14161. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey.欧洲对于微创表面活性剂给药的观点——一项调查
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;176(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2812-9. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
8
Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非侵入性通气策略与早产儿死亡率和支气管肺发育不良的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 9;316(6):611-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10708.
9
Observational Study on Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants<29 Weeks--Short and Long-term Outcomes.29周以下早产儿微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)的观察性研究——短期和长期结果
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2015 Dec;219(6):266-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547295. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
10
Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非插管表面活性剂应用与常规治疗在极早产儿中的对比:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):723-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504.