• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

18-40 岁胃癌患者的临床病理特征、生存结局和预后因素。

Clinicopathologic Features, Survival Outcome, and Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer Patients 18-40 Years of Age.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.

Department of General Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Aug;9(4):514-521. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0162. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1089/jayao.2019.0162
PMID:32069431
Abstract

Whether young patients with gastric cancer (GC) had a distinct prognostic outcome from older patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts. We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 2022 patients who underwent curative resection for GC. All patients were divided into the young patient group (18-40 years) and older patient group (>40 years) according to the patient age. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients were analyzed, and the survival difference between the two groups was compared. The incidence of GC in the patients 18-40 years of age was 8.1% (164/2022). The young patient group had different clinicopathologic features from the older group, including a significant female predominance, a larger number of retrieved lymph nodes, a higher proportion of undifferentiated histology type, and middle or lower 1/3 GC. However, the survival outcome of young patients was similar to that of their older counterparts (5-year disease free survival [DFS]: 47.0% vs. 44.0%,  = 0.247), even when comparison based on the TNM stage was made. Deeper tumor invasion (T3-T4 stage, hazard ratios [HR]: 5.791, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.908-11.533,  < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.500, 95% CIs: 1.308-4.781,  = 0.006), and lymphovascular invasion (HR: 2.191, 95% CIs: 1.306-3.677,  = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for young GC patients. Young age (18-40 years) was not associated with poorer survival outcome in GC patients. However, early diagnosis and curative resection with adequate lymphadenectomy will still be necessary for improving the survival outcome of young GC patients.

摘要

年轻胃癌患者的预后是否与老年患者不同仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨年轻胃癌患者的临床病理特征和预后因素,并与老年患者进行比较。

我们回顾性分析了 2022 例接受胃癌根治性切除术患者的临床病理和生存数据。根据患者年龄将所有患者分为年轻患者组(18-40 岁)和老年患者组(>40 岁)。分析了年轻胃癌患者的临床病理特征和预后因素,并比较了两组的生存差异。

18-40 岁年龄组胃癌的发病率为 8.1%(164/2022)。年轻患者组与老年组的临床病理特征不同,包括明显的女性优势、更多的淋巴结检出、更高比例的未分化组织学类型以及中下段胃癌。然而,年轻患者的生存结果与老年患者相似(5 年无病生存率[DFS]:47.0%对 44.0%,=0.247),即使基于 TNM 分期进行比较也是如此。更深的肿瘤侵袭(T3-T4 期,风险比[HR]:5.791,95%置信区间[CI]:2.908-11.533,<0.001)、淋巴结转移(HR:2.500,95%CI:1.308-4.781,=0.006)和血管淋巴管侵犯(HR:2.191,95%CI:1.306-3.677,=0.003)是年轻胃癌患者的独立预后因素。

年轻(18-40 岁)与胃癌患者的生存结果较差无关。然而,早期诊断和根治性切除术加足够的淋巴结清扫术仍将是改善年轻胃癌患者生存结果的必要手段。

相似文献

1
Clinicopathologic Features, Survival Outcome, and Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer Patients 18-40 Years of Age.18-40 岁胃癌患者的临床病理特征、生存结局和预后因素。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Aug;9(4):514-521. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0162. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Different clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of signet ring cell histology in early and locally advanced gastric cancer patients.早期和局部进展期胃癌患者的印戒细胞组织学的不同临床病理特征和预后意义。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;45(1):101454. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
[Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with advanced gastric cancer].[预后营养指数在进展期胃癌患者中的临床意义]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):180-184.
4
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of gastric cancer in young patients.青年胃癌患者的临床病理特征及预后
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1043-9. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1180707. Epub 2016 May 16.
5
[Study on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site].[非吻合口部位与吻合口部位胃残端癌的临床病理特征及预后差异研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;20(1):67-72.
6
[Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].[淋巴结阴性转移性胃癌的预后因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):190-194.
7
Intraoperative blood loss does not independently affect the survival outcome of gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.术中出血量并不独立影响接受根治性切除术的胃癌患者的生存结局。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Sep;21(9):1197-1206. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02046-6. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Clinicopathologic factors associated with recurrence and long-term survival in node-negative advanced gastric cancer patients.与淋巴结阴性的晚期胃癌患者复发和长期生存相关的临床病理因素。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019 Feb;111(2):111-120. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5829/2018.
9
Anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes: an indispensable prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.转移性淋巴结的解剖位置:接受根治性切除的胃癌患者不可或缺的预后因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):185-192. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1415371. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for young gastric adenocarcinoma patients after curative resection.青年胃癌患者根治性切除术后的临床病理特征及预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1464-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9809-1. Epub 2008 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Younger Face of Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies.揭示胃癌的年轻化面孔:流行病学、危险因素及预防策略的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Jun 21;16(6):e62826. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62826. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young gastric cancer patients: A propensity score‑matched SEER database analysis.青年胃癌患者的转移模式和预后:基于倾向评分匹配 SEER 数据库的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0301834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301834. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in young patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry.
年轻的晚期胃食管腺癌患者化疗的疗效和安全性:来自西班牙 AGAMENON-SEOM 注册登记处的数据。
Gastric Cancer. 2024 Jan;27(1):131-145. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01443-9. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
KLF5‑mediated expression of CARD11 promotes the progression of gastric cancer.KLF5介导的CARD11表达促进胃癌进展。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Jul 17;26(3):422. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12121. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Markers.用于检测肝细胞癌标志物的基于石墨烯的电化学传感器。
Front Chem. 2022 Apr 8;10:883627. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.883627. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer.非常年轻胃癌的临床病理特征、生存结局和预后因素。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Jun;23(2):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00822-3. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Clinical Features and Survival of Young Adults with Stage IV Gastric Cancer: a Japanese Population-Based Study.IV期胃癌青年患者的临床特征与生存情况:一项基于日本人群的研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Mar;54(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00797-6. Epub 2022 Jan 7.