School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041203.
One of the fundamental objectives of the basic medical security system is to provide institutional guarantees for the appropriate medical needs of different groups. Among them, achieving fairness of benefits is the first principle of the system. This study aims to explore the benefit equity of preventive health care for different groups and the specific path to promote fairness. Based on the 2015 CHNS survey data, through the theory construction of benefit fairness in the basic medical insurance and using the two-stage IV-Heckman model, the paper analyzes the benefit fairness of the basic medical insurance in urban and rural China. This study indicates that (1) the results of empirical and theoretical models are not consistent with the sample of the insured population. (2) As private medical insurance and medical assistance are restricted in the model, the reimbursement ratio of medical insurance in other income groups is all higher than the highest one. However, the coefficient is getting larger, with the lowest income group having the largest coefficient. After controlling for variables of disease and severity, the results suggest that the main impact path is hospitalization costs. (3) Taking the highest income group as a reference, the compensation proportion of preventive health care in other groups is higher, respectively, than the reference group, while the groups below middle income have a significant relationship with compensation for preventive health care. Supplementary private medical insurance and medical assistance have important protection functions for low- and middle-income populations. However, owing to the actual income threshold, the two groups cannot benefit from the medical security system. This result is still valid in the field of preventive health care. The increase of preventive health care expenditure reduces the cost of individual hospitalization, but the high-income group has emerged with more preventive health care expenditures, creating new unfairness.
基本医疗保障制度的根本目标之一是为不同群体的适当医疗需求提供制度保障。其中,实现利益公平是制度的首要原则。本研究旨在探讨不同群体预防保健的利益公平性及其促进公平的具体路径。
基于 2015 年 CHNS 调查数据,通过基本医疗保险利益公平理论构建,并利用两阶段 IV-Heckman 模型,分析了中国城乡基本医疗保险的利益公平性。研究结果表明:(1)实证和理论模型的结果与参保人群样本不一致。(2)由于模型中限制了私人医疗保险和医疗救助,其他收入群体的医疗保险报销比例均高于最高收入群体。但系数越来越大,最低收入群体的系数最大。在控制疾病和严重程度变量后,结果表明主要影响路径是住院费用。(3)以最高收入群体为参照,其他群体的预防保健补偿比例均高于参照组,而中下收入群体与预防保健补偿存在显著关系。补充私人医疗保险和医疗救助对中低收入人群具有重要的保护作用。但是,由于实际收入门槛,这两个群体无法从医疗保障制度中受益。这一结果在预防保健领域仍然有效。增加预防保健支出可以降低个人住院费用,但高收入群体出现了更多的预防保健支出,造成了新的不公平。