• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国消费者对化学产品安全信息提供的风险认知。

Korean Consumers' Recognition of Risks Depending on the Provision of Safety Information for Chemical Products.

机构信息

National Crisis and Emergency Management Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.

Department of Consumer Studies, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041207.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041207
PMID:32069985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068241/
Abstract

After the 2011 "Oxy accident" involving deaths from humidifier disinfectants, Korean consumers' anxiety about chemical products has risen. To provide timely, appropriate information to consumers, we must understand their risk recognition and explore methods of safety information provision. We investigated Korean consumers' level of risk perception for chemical products depending on the provision of safety information and other factors. We conducted an online survey for 10 days with 600 adult Korean consumer participants and analyzed seven factors: catastrophic potential, controllability, familiarity, fear, scientific knowledge, and risk for future generations. Our results showed that married women over 30 perceived chemical products as higher risk, but when information was provided on how to use products safely, catastrophic potential, controllability, fear, scientific knowledge, as well as risk perception, increased significantly. When only risk diagnosis information was provided, catastrophic potential, fear, and risk for future generations remained static, but familiarity had a negative effect (R^2 = 0.586). Age and scientific knowledge affected the recognition of risk when safe risk management methods were provided (R^2 = 0.587). Risk controllability did not have any effect on risk perception. These results suggest that providing information about avoiding or dealing with risks has a positive effect on consumers' risk perception.

摘要

2011 年“加湿器杀菌剂事件”导致人员死亡后,韩国消费者对化学产品的焦虑情绪有所上升。为了向消费者提供及时、适当的信息,我们必须了解他们对风险的认知,并探索安全信息提供方法。我们根据安全信息的提供情况和其他因素,调查了韩国消费者对化学产品的风险感知程度。我们对 600 名成年韩国消费者进行了为期 10 天的在线调查,分析了七个因素:灾难性潜力、可控性、熟悉度、恐惧、科学知识以及对后代的风险。研究结果表明,已婚 30 岁以上的女性认为化学产品风险更高,但当提供有关如何安全使用产品的信息时,灾难性潜力、可控性、恐惧、科学知识以及风险感知都会显著增加。当仅提供风险诊断信息时,灾难性潜力、恐惧和对后代的风险保持不变,但熟悉度会产生负面影响(R^2 = 0.586)。提供安全风险管理方法时,年龄和科学知识会影响风险识别(R^2 = 0.587)。风险可控性对风险感知没有影响。这些结果表明,提供有关避免或处理风险的信息对消费者的风险感知有积极影响。

相似文献

1
Korean Consumers' Recognition of Risks Depending on the Provision of Safety Information for Chemical Products.韩国消费者对化学产品安全信息提供的风险认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):1207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041207.
2
Chemophobia and knowledge of toxicological principles in South-Korea: perceptions of trace chemicals in consumer products.韩国的化学恐惧症与毒理学原理知识:对消费品中痕量化学物质的认知。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2021 Mar 4;84(5):183-195. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2020.1851834. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
3
Trace chemicals in consumer products - Consumers' acceptance before and after receiving information about toxicological principles.追踪消费品中的化学物质 - 在向消费者提供毒理学原理信息前后对其接受程度的调查。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Jul;153:112252. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112252. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.消费者安全消费非理性行为及其影响因素研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122764.
5
Consumer-perceived risks of genetically modified food in China.中国消费者对转基因食品的认知风险。
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104520. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.营养信息披露对韩国消费者行为意向的影响。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(5):378-84. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.939785. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.猪肉消费风险与益处信息对中国消费者对猪肉的认知及食用意愿的影响。
Meat Sci. 2014 Dec;98(4):766-72. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
8
Interactive survey of consumer awareness of nanotechnologies and nanoparticles in consumer products in South Korea.韩国消费者对消费品中纳米技术和纳米颗粒的认知的交互式调查。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 Dec 15;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):11-20. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S57919. eCollection 2014.
9
Consumers' perceptions of chemical household products and the associated risks.消费者对家用化学品及其相关风险的认知。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Sep;143:111511. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111511. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Development of Safe Food Handling Guidelines for Korean Consumers.韩国消费者安全食品处理指南的制定。
J Food Prot. 2015 Aug;78(8):1541-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-506.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Awareness of Consumer Products Containing Radioactive Materials: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia.公众对含有放射性材料的消费品的认知:来自马来西亚的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042326.
2
A Study on the Behavior Patterns of Liquid Aerosols Using Disinfectant Chloromethylisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Solution.使用消毒剂氯甲基异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮溶液对液体气溶胶行为模式的研究。
Molecules. 2021 Sep 22;26(19):5725. doi: 10.3390/molecules26195725.
3
Safety Behaviors to Reduce Risk of Using Chemical Household Products: An Application of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework.减少使用家用化学品风险的安全行为:风险感知态度框架的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 27;17(5):1528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051528.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Anxiety over Radiation Exposure and Acquisition of Knowledge Regarding Occupational Health Management in Operation Leader Candidates of Radioactivity Decontamination Workers in Fukushima, Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本福岛放射性去污作业员中,对辐射暴露的焦虑与获取职业健康管理知识之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 28;17(1):228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010228.
2
Effects of a Nicotine Fact Sheet on Perceived Risk of Nicotine and E-Cigarettes and Intentions to Seek Information About and Use E-Cigarettes.尼古丁信息单对尼古丁和电子烟感知风险的影响,以及对电子烟信息的获取和使用意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 23;17(1):131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010131.
3
Valuing Acute Health Risks of Air Pollution in the Jinchuan Mining Area, China: A Choice Experiment with Perceived Exposure and Hazardousness as Co-Determinants.重视中国金川矿区空气污染的急性健康风险:以感知暴露和危害性为共同决定因素的选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 18;16(22):4563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224563.
4
Earthquake Disaster Risk Perception Process Model for Rural Households: A Pilot Study from Southwestern China.农户地震灾害风险感知过程模型:来自中国西南地区的初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224512.
5
Determinants of Hurricane Evacuation from a Large Representative Sample of the U.S. Gulf Coast.美国墨西哥湾沿岸大代表性样本中飓风疏散的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 3;16(21):4268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214268.
6
Risk perception, worry, and pedestrian behaviour in the Norwegian population.挪威人口的风险感知、担忧和行人行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Dec;133:105294. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105294. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
College Students' Experience of a Food Safety Class and Their Responses to the MSG Issue.大学生对食品安全课的体验及其对味精问题的反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 19;16(16):2977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162977.
8
An Empirical Study on the Influence Path of Environmental Risk Perception on Behavioral Responses In China.中国环境风险感知对行为反应影响路径的实证研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 10;16(16):2856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162856.
9
Cognitive Biases of Consumers' Risk Perception of Foodborne Diseases in China: Examining Anchoring Effect.消费者对中国食源性疾病风险感知的认知偏差:锚定效应的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(13):2268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132268.
10
Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public's Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China.食品安全风险感知是否会影响公众对政府的信任?基于全国性调查的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111874.