Pérez Luis Pérez Y, Gracia Azucena, Barreiro-Hurlé Jesús
Unidad de Economía Agroalimentaria y de los Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Av Montañana, 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain.
Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza), 50059 Zaragoza, Spain.
Foods. 2020 Feb 13;9(2):186. doi: 10.3390/foods9020186.
Multiple quality labels that signal whether a particular food has special characteristics relating to geographical origin or production method have become standard within European food policy. The aim of this paper was to investigate how two of these labels in particular influence consumers' food choices. We assessed consumers' preferences for an extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) displaying EU quality labels and focus on whether they are complements or substitutes. In order to do so, we used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to estimate main and two-way interactions effects with data from a self-administrated survey in a Spanish region. Results indicate that while consumers positively value both the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and the organic labels, the valuation for PDO is almost double that of the valuation of the organic label. Furthermore, the findings show that for a majority of consumers considered both labels substitutes, while a small group considered them complements. These findings can help producers identify an optimal labelling strategy to maximize returns on certification investments.
多个表明特定食品是否具有与地理来源或生产方法相关的特殊特征的质量标签已成为欧洲食品政策的标准。本文的目的是研究其中两个标签如何特别影响消费者的食品选择。我们评估了消费者对带有欧盟质量标签的特级初榨橄榄油(EVOO)的偏好,并关注它们是互补品还是替代品。为了做到这一点,我们使用了离散选择实验(DCE),根据西班牙一个地区的一项自我管理调查数据来估计主要效应和双向交互效应。结果表明,虽然消费者对原产地保护(PDO)标签和有机标签都给予了积极评价,但对PDO标签的评价几乎是对有机标签评价的两倍。此外,研究结果表明,对于大多数消费者来说,这两个标签是替代品,而一小部分消费者则认为它们是互补品。这些发现可以帮助生产商确定最佳标签策略,以实现认证投资回报的最大化。