Suppr超能文献

评估给药时机——我们是否达到了目标?

Evaluation of Medication Administration Timing-Are We Meeting Our Goals?

机构信息

University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):750-754. doi: 10.1177/0897190020905456. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 482.23(c) regarding medication administration, hospital policies and procedures must identify time-critical scheduled medications which must be administered within 30 minutes either before or after the scheduled dosing time, for a total administration window of 1 hour.

OBJECTIVE

The general objective of this analysis was to determine whether there was a difference in meeting medication administration goals when comparing time-critical to non-time-critical scheduled medication administration in both intensive care units (ICUs) and general medical floors at a large, academic medical center.

METHODS

Data were collected in 6 inpatient nursing units (3 general medical units and 3 ICUs) during the month of June 2017. Electronic medical record charge data for medications were used to evaluate timeliness of medication administration.

RESULTS

In total, 69,794 medication administrations were evaluated. Of 389 administrations of time-critical scheduled medications, 268 (69%) were administered on time. Of 69,405 administrations of non-time-critical scheduled medications, 58,099 (84%) were administered on time ( < 0.001). ICUs had a higher percentage of on-time administrations than general medical units (89% vs 77%, < 0.001), and nurses had a higher percentage of on-time administrations than respiratory therapists (84% vs 63%, < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-time-critical scheduled medications were more commonly administered on time compared with time-critical scheduled medications. Staff education and optimizations to the electronic health record (EHR) are interventions that may improve administration of time-critical scheduled medications.

摘要

背景

根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)关于药物管理的《联邦法规法典》(CFR)第 482.23(c)条,医院政策和程序必须确定必须在规定剂量时间前或后 30 分钟内给予的时间关键的规定药物,总给药时间窗口为 1 小时。

目的

本分析的总体目标是确定在大型学术医疗中心的重症监护病房(ICU)和普通医疗楼层比较时间关键与非时间关键的规定药物管理时,药物管理目标的差异。

方法

在 2017 年 6 月的一个月期间,在 6 个住院护理单元(3 个普通医疗单元和 3 个 ICU)中收集数据。使用电子病历计费数据评估药物给药的及时性。

结果

共评估了 69794 次药物给药。在 389 次时间关键规定药物的给药中,268 次(69%)按时给药。在 69405 次非时间关键规定药物的给药中,58099 次(84%)按时给药(<0.001)。与普通医疗单元相比,ICU 的按时给药比例更高(89%比 77%,<0.001),护士的按时给药比例高于呼吸治疗师(84%比 63%,<0.001)。

结论

与时间关键规定药物相比,非时间关键规定药物更常按时给药。工作人员教育和对电子健康记录(EHR)的优化是可能改善时间关键规定药物给药的干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验