Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Disorders University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
School of Nursing, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas.
Respir Care. 2020 Aug;65(8):1104-1111. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07132. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Asthma is common in older adults and is confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory air-flow limitations, typically evaluated by spirometric assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness. However, many patients with clinically suspected asthma and documented air-flow obstruction do not exhibit a post-bronchodilator response that meets or exceeds current established guidelines. We investigated if extending the time from bronchodilator administration to assessment of bronchodilator response increases the yield of spirometry for the diagnosis of asthma in older adults.
This was a cross-sectional study. The subjects were non-smokers, ≥ 60 y old, and with suspected asthma. Subjects were characterized as (1) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, (2) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 60-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, and (3) those without a positive bronchodilator response but with a positive methacholine challenge test. Factors associated with a late response to bronchodilator were evaluated by using bivariate analysis and by multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model.
This study enrolled 165 subjects. Of these, 81 (49.1%) had a positive bronchodilator response on 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry; 25 (15.2%) had a positive bronchodilator response on the 1-h post-bronchodilator spirometry; and 59 (35.8%) had no positive bronchodilator response but had a positive methacholine challenge test. On multivariable regression analysis, those with a higher baseline percentage of predicted FEV, higher scores on a standard asthma control test, and wheezing and/or cough after exercise were more likely to either have a late bronchodilator response or no bronchodilator response.
Our study showed that a late positive response to bronchodilator use was more common than previously presumed in older subjects with suspected asthma. Pulmonary function testing laboratories should consider routinely reassessing spirometry at 1 h after bronchodilator use if the earlier assessment did not reveal a significant response.
哮喘在老年人中很常见,通过呼气气流受限的可变性来证实,通常通过支气管扩张剂反应性的肺量计评估来评估。然而,许多有临床怀疑哮喘和已记录气流阻塞的患者并没有表现出符合或超过当前既定指南的支气管扩张剂后反应。我们研究了在评估支气管扩张剂反应时,从支气管扩张剂给药到评估的时间延长是否会增加老年人哮喘的肺量计诊断率。
这是一项横断面研究。受试者为不吸烟、年龄≥60 岁且疑似哮喘的患者。受试者分为以下三类:(1)支气管扩张剂后 30 分钟肺量计检查有阳性反应者,(2)支气管扩张剂后 60 分钟肺量计检查有阳性反应者,(3)无阳性支气管扩张剂反应但有阳性乙酰甲胆碱激发试验者。使用二变量分析和多元逻辑回归模型对与支气管扩张剂反应延迟相关的因素进行评估。
本研究共纳入 165 名受试者。其中,81 名(49.1%)在支气管扩张剂后 30 分钟肺量计检查中有阳性反应;25 名(15.2%)在支气管扩张剂后 1 小时肺量计检查中有阳性反应;59 名(35.8%)无阳性支气管扩张剂反应但有阳性乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。多元回归分析显示,基础预测 FEV%较高、标准哮喘控制测试评分较高、运动后喘息和/或咳嗽的患者,更有可能出现延迟的支气管扩张剂反应或无支气管扩张剂反应。
我们的研究表明,在有疑似哮喘的老年患者中,与之前的推测相比,使用支气管扩张剂后出现迟发性阳性反应更为常见。如果早期评估未显示出明显的反应,肺功能检测实验室应考虑常规在支气管扩张剂使用后 1 小时重新评估肺量计。