• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖非吸烟患者支气管扩张剂可逆性试验:氟替卡松/沙美特罗疗效优于沙丁胺醇支气管扩张剂。

Bronchodilator reversibility testing in morbidly obese non-smokers: fluticasone/salmeterol efficacy versus salbutamol bronchodilator.

机构信息

Department of chest Ds & TB, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-suef University, Beni-suef, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02682-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12890-023-02682-3
PMID:37814253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563321/
Abstract

A positive response in reversibility testing is widely used to diagnose patients with airway limitations. However, despite its simple procedure, it doesn't accurately reflect the exact airway irreversibility. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a bronchodilation reversibility test using salbutamol and fluticasone/salmeterol combination in obese non-smoker subjects.The study included patients without a history of obstructive lung disease or bronchodilators. A sub-classification of patients based on body mass index (BMI) was carried out into normal (< 24.9 kg/m), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m), and obese (BMI ≥ 30). Spirometry measurements were performed before and after salbutamol or fluticasone/salmeterol administration.The study included 415 (49.9% male) patients with a mean age of 40.92 ± 10.86 years. Obese subjects showed a high prevalence of restrictive patterns (23.4%), with non-significantly lower spirometric values compared to normal and overweight subjects (p > 0.05). The magnitude of bronchodilation, as identified by spirometry, following fluticasone/salmeterol was higher in all participants, with a significant increase in obese subjects with a p-value of 0.013, 0.002, and 0.035 for FEV, FEV% predicted, and FEV/FVC, respectively.Fluticasone/salmeterol combination increases FEV, FEV% of predicted, and FEV/FVC ratio than the conventional test using salbutamol inhaler, and it can be a potential candidate for assessment of airway obstruction using reversibility test, especially among the obese population.

摘要

阳性的气道可逆性试验反应被广泛用于诊断气道受限的患者。然而,尽管其操作简单,但并不能准确反映确切的气道不可逆性。本研究旨在探究沙丁胺醇和氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合支气管扩张剂逆转试验在肥胖非吸烟患者中的疗效。

研究纳入了无阻塞性肺疾病或支气管扩张剂使用史的患者。根据体重指数(BMI)对患者进行了亚分类,分为正常(<24.9kg/m)、超重(25-29.9kg/m)和肥胖(BMI≥30)。在给予沙丁胺醇或氟替卡松/沙美特罗之前和之后进行了肺量测定。

本研究共纳入了 415 名(49.9%为男性)患者,平均年龄为 40.92±10.86 岁。肥胖患者表现出高比例的限制性模式(23.4%),与正常和超重患者相比,其肺量测定值无显著差异(p>0.05)。根据肺量测定,所有参与者在使用氟替卡松/沙美特罗后,支气管扩张的程度较大,肥胖患者的差异具有统计学意义(p 值分别为 0.013、0.002 和 0.035,对于 FEV、FEV%预测值和 FEV/FVC)。

与常规使用沙丁胺醇吸入器的试验相比,氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药能更显著地增加 FEV、FEV%预测值和 FEV/FVC 比值,且可能是气道阻塞可逆性试验评估的潜在候选药物,尤其是在肥胖人群中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e28/10563321/8f5845ab96b4/12890_2023_2682_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e28/10563321/8f5845ab96b4/12890_2023_2682_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e28/10563321/8f5845ab96b4/12890_2023_2682_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in morbidly obese non-smokers: fluticasone/salmeterol efficacy versus salbutamol bronchodilator.肥胖非吸烟患者支气管扩张剂可逆性试验:氟替卡松/沙美特罗疗效优于沙丁胺醇支气管扩张剂。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02682-3.
2
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in morbidly obese non-smokers: a comparative study- few concerns.重度肥胖非吸烟患者支气管扩张剂可逆性试验:一项对比研究——关注甚少。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02951-9.
3
[Bronchodilator efficacy of combined salmeterol and tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].沙美特罗与噻托溴铵联合使用对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的支气管扩张疗效
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 Mar;41(3):130-4. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60413-8.
4
Comparable spirometric efficacy of tiotropium compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with COPD: a pilot study.噻托溴铵与沙美特罗加氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺量计疗效比较:一项初步研究。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
5
Early reversibility to salbutamol does not always predict bronchodilation after salmeterol in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.在稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病中,对沙丁胺醇的早期可逆性并不总是能预测沙美特罗治疗后的支气管扩张情况。
Respir Med. 1998 Aug;92(8):1012-6. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90347-x.
6
Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in Asian patients (aged ≥16 years) with asthma: a sub-analysis of the COSMOS study.布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗在亚洲哮喘患者(≥16 岁)中的应用:COSMOS 研究的一项亚分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Jul 1;32(7):439-49. doi: 10.2165/11598840-000000000-00000.
7
Effects of formoterol, salmeterol or oxitropium bromide on airway responses to salbutamol in COPD.福莫特罗、沙美特罗或异丙托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者气道对沙丁胺醇反应的影响。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Jun;11(6):1337-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061337.
8
Comparison of the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast in combination with that of their use as single treatments in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.沙美特罗和扎鲁司特联合使用与单独使用时在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的支气管扩张作用比较。
Respiration. 2001;68(5):452-9. doi: 10.1159/000050550.
9
Inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol suppress eosinophilic airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: relations with lung function and bronchodilator reversibility.吸入氟替卡松和沙美特罗可抑制慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的嗜酸性气道炎症:与肺功能及支气管扩张剂可逆性的关系
Lung. 2006 Jul-Aug;184(4):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00408-005-2586-8.
10
Bronchodilator effect of an inhaled combination therapy with salmeterol + fluticasone and formoterol + budesonide in patients with COPD.沙美特罗+氟替卡松与福莫特罗+布地奈德吸入联合疗法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的支气管扩张作用。
Respir Med. 2003 May;97(5):453-7. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1455.

引用本文的文献

1
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in morbidly obese non-smokers: a comparative study- few concerns.重度肥胖非吸烟患者支气管扩张剂可逆性试验:一项对比研究——关注甚少。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02951-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing bronchodilator response by changes in per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second.评估一秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比的变化来判断支气管扩张剂反应。
J Investig Med. 2021 Jun;69(5):1027-1034. doi: 10.1136/jim-2020-001663. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Current Bronchodilator Responsiveness Criteria Underestimate Asthma in Older Adults.现行的支气管扩张剂反应性标准低估了老年人的哮喘情况。
Respir Care. 2020 Aug;65(8):1104-1111. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07132. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Determining the optimal time to assess the reversibility of airway obstruction.
确定评估气道阻塞可逆性的最佳时间。
Lung India. 2019 Mar-Apr;36(2):123-130. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_184_18.
4
BMI but not central obesity predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction.BMI 而非中心性肥胖会导致支气管收缩时气道关闭。
Respirology. 2019 Jun;24(6):543-550. doi: 10.1111/resp.13478. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Substantial variation exists in spirometry interpretation practices for airflow obstruction in accredited lung function laboratories across Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的认证肺功能实验室中,对于气流阻塞的肺功能解读实践存在很大差异。
Intern Med J. 2019 Jan;49(1):41-47. doi: 10.1111/imj.14047.
6
The asthma-obesity relationship: underlying mechanisms and treatment implications.哮喘与肥胖的关系:潜在机制与治疗意义。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000446.
7
Causes of misdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic scoping review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病误诊原因:一项系统的范围综述
Respir Med. 2017 Aug;129:63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Spirometry and volumetric capnography in lung function assessment of obese and normal-weight individuals without asthma.肥胖和体重正常且无哮喘个体肺功能评估中的肺量计检查和容积式二氧化碳描记法
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017 Jul-Aug;93(4):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.10.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
9
Add-on LABA in a separate inhaler as asthma step-up therapy increased dose of ICS or ICS/LABA combination inhaler.作为哮喘升级治疗,在单独的吸入器中添加长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)可增加吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)或ICS/LABA联合吸入器的剂量。
ERJ Open Res. 2016 May 26;2(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00106-2015. eCollection 2016 Apr.
10
Addressing the misdiagnosis of asthma in adults: where does it go wrong?解决成人哮喘的误诊问题:问题出在哪里?
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016 Nov;10(11):1187-1198. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1242415. Epub 2016 Oct 8.