• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宜居生活?RESIDE对西澳大利亚州珀斯“宜居社区”规划政策对居民健康支持行为和福祉的评估。

Living liveable? RESIDE's evaluation of the "Liveable Neighborhoods" planning policy on the health supportive behaviors and wellbeing of residents in Perth, Western Australia.

作者信息

Hooper Paula, Foster Sarah, Bull Fiona, Knuiman Matthew, Christian Hayley, Timperio Anna, Wood Lisa, Trapp Gina, Boruff Bryan, Francis Jacinta, Strange Cecily, Badland Hannah, Gunn Lucy, Falconer Ryan, Learnihan Vincent, McCormack Gavin, Sugiyama Takemi, Giles-Corti Billie

机构信息

Australian Urban Design Research Centre, School of Design, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100538. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100538
PMID:32072006
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7016024/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The RESIDential Environments (RESIDE) project is a unique longitudinal natural experiment designed to evaluate the health impacts of the "Liveable Neighbourhoods" planning policy, which was introduced by the Western Australian government to create more walkable suburbs.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the RESIDE evidence of the impact of the planning policy on a range of health-supportive behaviours and wellbeing outcomes and to assess the consistency and direction of the estimates of associations.

METHODS

An audit of 26 RESIDE research papers (from 2003 to 2012) identified the number of positive associations (statistically significant and consistent with policy expectations), negative associations (statistically significant and inconsistent with policy expectations), and null findings from multiple-exposure models between objective and perceived measures of 20 policy design requirements and 13 health-supportive behaviors and wellbeing outcomes.

RESULTS

In total 332 eligible estimates of associations ( = 257 objective measures and  = 75 perceived measures) were identified. Positively significant findings were detected for: 57% of walking estimates with objectively measured policy design features (negative = 3%; null = 40%) ( = 115) and 54% perceived measures (negative = 0%; null = 33%) ( = 27); 42% of sense of community estimates with objectively measured of policy design features (negative = 8%; null = 50%) ( = 12) and 61% perceived measures (negative = 8%; null = 31%) ( = 13); 39% of safety or crime-related estimates with objectively measured of policy design features (negative = 22%; null = 39%) ( = 28) and 100% perceived measures ( = 7). All (n = 4) estimates for mental health outcomes with objectively measured policy-related design features were positively significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthesis of findings suggests that new suburban communities built in accordance with the "Liveable Neighbourhoods" policy have the potential to encourage health supportive behaviors and wellbeing outcomes including transport and recreation walking, and to create neighborhoods with a stronger sense of community where residents may feel safer.

摘要

背景

住宅环境(RESIDE)项目是一项独特的纵向自然实验,旨在评估西澳大利亚州政府推出的“宜居社区”规划政策对健康的影响,该政策旨在打造更适合步行的郊区。

目的

总结RESIDE项目中关于规划政策对一系列促进健康行为和幸福结果影响的证据,并评估关联估计的一致性和方向。

方法

对26篇RESIDE研究论文(2003年至2012年)进行审核,确定在20项政策设计要求的客观和主观衡量指标与13种促进健康行为及幸福结果之间的多暴露模型中,正向关联(具有统计学意义且与政策预期一致)、负向关联(具有统计学意义且与政策预期不一致)以及无显著结果的数量。

结果

共确定了332项符合条件的关联估计(客观衡量指标=257项,主观衡量指标=75项)。在客观测量的政策设计特征方面,57%的步行估计结果为正向显著(负向=3%;无显著结果=40%)(n=115),54%的主观测量结果为正向显著(负向=0%;无显著结果=33%)(n=27);在客观测量的政策设计特征方面,42%的社区归属感估计结果为正向显著(负向=8%;无显著结果=50%)(n=12),61%的主观测量结果为正向显著(负向=8%;无显著结果=31%)(n=13);在客观测量的政策设计特征方面,39%的安全或犯罪相关估计结果为正向显著(负向=22%;无显著结果=39%)(n=28),100%的主观测量结果为正向显著(n=7)。所有(n=4)与心理健康结果相关的、基于客观测量的政策相关设计特征的估计结果均为正向显著。

结论

研究结果综合表明,按照“宜居社区”政策建设的新郊区社区有可能鼓励促进健康的行为和幸福结果,包括交通和休闲步行,并营造出社区意识更强、居民可能感觉更安全的社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/758b99dae5b9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/2d9a683a5a96/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/b6270e818e3e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/762a31df8aa1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/ad2dc396f689/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/a1248aafa4fc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/72998ec472fd/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/0887a60ed7ff/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/758b99dae5b9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/2d9a683a5a96/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/b6270e818e3e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/762a31df8aa1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/ad2dc396f689/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/a1248aafa4fc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/72998ec472fd/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/0887a60ed7ff/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ad/7016024/758b99dae5b9/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Living liveable? RESIDE's evaluation of the "Liveable Neighborhoods" planning policy on the health supportive behaviors and wellbeing of residents in Perth, Western Australia.宜居生活?RESIDE对西澳大利亚州珀斯“宜居社区”规划政策对居民健康支持行为和福祉的评估。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100538. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Evaluating the implementation and active living impacts of a state government planning policy designed to create walkable neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia.评估一项旨在在西澳大利亚州珀斯创建适宜步行社区的州政府规划政策的实施情况及其对积极生活方式的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S5-18. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130503-QUAN-226.
3
Are liveable neighbourhoods safer neighbourhoods? Testing the rhetoric on new urbanism and safety from crime in Perth, Western Australia.宜居社区是否更安全?检验关于澳大利亚西部珀斯新城市主义与犯罪安全的言辞。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Are we developing walkable suburbs through urban planning policy? Identifying the mix of design requirements to optimise walking outcomes from the 'Liveable Neighbourhoods' planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.我们是否正在通过城市规划政策来发展适宜步行的郊区?确定设计要求的组合,以优化西澳大利亚州珀斯市“宜居社区”规划政策下的步行效果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 May 16;12:63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0225-1.
5
The building blocks of a 'Liveable Neighbourhood': Identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.“宜居社区”的构成要素:确定西澳大利亚州珀斯一项运营规划政策中步行的关键绩效指标。
Health Place. 2015 Nov;36:173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
6
A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the 'Research into Policy' and 'Evidence-Based Policy' Gap for Active-Living Science.一项自然实验研究案例,弥合了“研究到政策”和“循证政策”之间的差距,以推动积极生活科学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(14):2448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142448.
7
Can the impact on health of a government policy designed to create more liveable neighbourhoods be evaluated? An overview of the RESIDential Environment Project.一项旨在打造更宜居社区的政府政策对健康的影响能否得到评估?住宅环境项目概述。
N S W Public Health Bull. 2007 Nov-Dec;18(11-12):238-42. doi: 10.1071/nb07027.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Planning safer suburbs: do changes in the built environment influence residents' perceptions of crime risk?规划更安全的郊区:建成环境的变化是否会影响居民对犯罪风险的感知?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
10
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of the Neighborhood Environment on Recreational Walking within the Neighborhood: Results from RESIDE.邻里环境对邻里内休闲步行影响的纵向分析:RESIDE研究结果
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 12;125(7):077009. doi: 10.1289/EHP823.

引用本文的文献

1
How could 20-minute neighbourhoods impact health and health inequalities? A policy scoping review.20分钟社区如何影响健康及健康不平等?一项政策范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3426. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20928-5.
2
Associations between neighborhood walkability and walking following residential relocation: Findings from Alberta's Tomorrow Project.社区可步行性与居住迁移后步行的关联:来自艾伯塔省明日项目的研究结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;10:1116691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1116691. eCollection 2022.
3
Built Environments And Child Health in WalEs and AuStralia (BEACHES): a study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the 'Research into Policy' and 'Evidence-Based Policy' Gap for Active-Living Science.一项自然实验研究案例,弥合了“研究到政策”和“循证政策”之间的差距,以推动积极生活科学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(14):2448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142448.
2
The Built Environment as a Determinant of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies and Natural Experiments.《作为身体活动决定因素的建成环境:纵向研究和自然实验的系统综述》。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Feb 17;52(3):239-251. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax043.
3
Experiences of connectivity and severance in the wake of a new motorway: Implications for health and well-being.
《威尔士和澳大利亚的建筑环境与儿童健康(BEACHES):研究方案》
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 25;12(10):e061978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061978.
4
Associations between Children's Physical Activity and Neighborhood Environments Using GIS: A Secondary Analysis from a Systematic Scoping Review.基于 GIS 的儿童身体活动与邻里环境关联的研究:系统评价的二次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031033.
5
Heart healthy cities: genetics loads the gun but the environment pulls the trigger.心脏健康城市:基因是扳机,但环境才是扣动扳机的人。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2422-2438. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab235.
新高速公路建成后连通性和割裂性的体验:对健康和幸福感的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.049. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
4
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity.建成环境对身体活动和主动出行影响的系统文献综述——健康公平性的更新与新发现
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 16;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9.
5
Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes.出于交通或娱乐目的步行的相关因素。
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S77-S98. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s77.
6
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of the Neighborhood Environment on Recreational Walking within the Neighborhood: Results from RESIDE.邻里环境对邻里内休闲步行影响的纵向分析:RESIDE研究结果
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 12;125(7):077009. doi: 10.1289/EHP823.
7
The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: a quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments.改变建成环境对身体活动的影响:自然实验中偏倚风险的定量综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0433-3.
8
Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities.利用科学指导城市规划政策和实践:如何实现健康可持续的未来城市。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2936-2947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30068-X. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
City planning and population health: a global challenge.城市规划与人群健康:全球性挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2912-2924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
The building blocks of a 'Liveable Neighbourhood': Identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.“宜居社区”的构成要素:确定西澳大利亚州珀斯一项运营规划政策中步行的关键绩效指标。
Health Place. 2015 Nov;36:173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 21.