• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项自然实验研究案例,弥合了“研究到政策”和“循证政策”之间的差距,以推动积极生活科学。

A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the 'Research into Policy' and 'Evidence-Based Policy' Gap for Active-Living Science.

机构信息

Australian Urban Design Research Centre, School of Design, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.

Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(14):2448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142448.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16142448
PMID:31295823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678749/
Abstract

The translation of research into tangible health benefits via changes to urban planning policy and practice is a key intended outcome of academic active-living research endeavours. Conversely, policy-makers and planners identify the need for policy-specific evidence to ensure policy decisions and practices are informed and validated by rigorously established evidence. In practice, however, these two aspirations rarely meet and a research-translation gap remains. The RESIDE project is a unique longitudinal natural experiment designed to evaluate the health impacts of the 'Liveable Neighbourhoods' planning policy, which was introduced by the Western Australian Government to create more walkable suburbs. This commentary provides an overview and discussion of the policy-specific study methodologies undertaken to quantitatively assess the implementation of the policy and assess its active living and health impacts. It outlines the key research-translation successes and impact of the findings on the Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and discusses lessons learnt from the RESIDE project to inform future natural experiments of policy evaluation.

摘要

通过改变城市规划政策和实践将研究转化为切实的健康效益,是积极生活学术研究工作的一个主要预期成果。相反,政策制定者和规划者认识到需要有针对性的政策证据,以确保政策决策和实践是明智的,并得到严格确立的证据的验证。然而,实际上,这两个愿望很少能实现,研究转化之间仍然存在差距。RESIDE 项目是一个独特的纵向自然实验,旨在评估“宜居社区”规划政策的健康影响,该政策是由西澳大利亚政府推出的,旨在创建更多适合步行的郊区。本评论概述并讨论了为定量评估政策的实施情况并评估其积极生活和健康影响而采用的具体政策研究方法。它概述了关键的研究转化成功,并讨论了研究结果对宜居社区政策的影响,以及从 RESIDE 项目中吸取的经验教训,为未来的政策评估自然实验提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8f/6678749/ad90edecd947/ijerph-16-02448-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8f/6678749/7d060acb29ea/ijerph-16-02448-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8f/6678749/ad90edecd947/ijerph-16-02448-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8f/6678749/7d060acb29ea/ijerph-16-02448-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8f/6678749/ad90edecd947/ijerph-16-02448-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the 'Research into Policy' and 'Evidence-Based Policy' Gap for Active-Living Science.一项自然实验研究案例,弥合了“研究到政策”和“循证政策”之间的差距,以推动积极生活科学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(14):2448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142448.
2
Are we developing walkable suburbs through urban planning policy? Identifying the mix of design requirements to optimise walking outcomes from the 'Liveable Neighbourhoods' planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.我们是否正在通过城市规划政策来发展适宜步行的郊区?确定设计要求的组合,以优化西澳大利亚州珀斯市“宜居社区”规划政策下的步行效果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 May 16;12:63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0225-1.
3
Can the impact on health of a government policy designed to create more liveable neighbourhoods be evaluated? An overview of the RESIDential Environment Project.一项旨在打造更宜居社区的政府政策对健康的影响能否得到评估?住宅环境项目概述。
N S W Public Health Bull. 2007 Nov-Dec;18(11-12):238-42. doi: 10.1071/nb07027.
4
Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia.宜居性的愿望和现实:澳大利亚实施旨在创建健康城市的城市政策。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112713. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112713. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
The building blocks of a 'Liveable Neighbourhood': Identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.“宜居社区”的构成要素:确定西澳大利亚州珀斯一项运营规划政策中步行的关键绩效指标。
Health Place. 2015 Nov;36:173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
6
Evaluating the implementation and active living impacts of a state government planning policy designed to create walkable neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia.评估一项旨在在西澳大利亚州珀斯创建适宜步行社区的州政府规划政策的实施情况及其对积极生活方式的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S5-18. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130503-QUAN-226.
7
Developing a research and practice tool to measure walkability: a demonstration project.开发一种用于衡量步行便利性的研究与实践工具:一个示范项目。
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Dec;25(3):160-6. doi: 10.1071/HE14050.
8
Living liveable? RESIDE's evaluation of the "Liveable Neighborhoods" planning policy on the health supportive behaviors and wellbeing of residents in Perth, Western Australia.宜居生活?RESIDE对西澳大利亚州珀斯“宜居社区”规划政策对居民健康支持行为和福祉的评估。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100538. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Designing healthy communities: creating evidence on metrics for built environment features associated with walkable neighbourhood activity centres.设计健康社区:生成关于与适宜步行的邻里活动中心相关的建筑环境特征指标的证据。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 4;14(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0621-9.
10
Reconnecting urban planning with health: a protocol for the development and validation of national liveability indicators associated with noncommunicable disease risk behaviours and health outcomes.重新将城市规划与健康联系起来:一项关于制定和验证与非传染性疾病风险行为及健康结果相关的国家宜居性指标的方案。
Public Health Res Pract. 2014 Nov 28;25(1):e2511405. doi: 10.17061/phrp2511405.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping and analysis of laws influencing built environments for walking and cycling in Australia.澳大利亚步行和骑行环境相关法律的绘制与分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14897-w.
2
Moving beyond Table 1: A critical review of the literature addressing social determinants of health in chronic condition symptom cluster research.超越表 1:对慢性疾病症状群研究中健康社会决定因素文献的批判性回顾。
Nurs Inq. 2023 Jan;30(1):e12519. doi: 10.1111/nin.12519. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Exploring the potential for planning support systems to bridge the research-translation gap between public health and urban planning.

本文引用的文献

1
Built environment and cardio-metabolic health: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.建筑环境与心代谢健康:纵向研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Jan;20(1):41-54. doi: 10.1111/obr.12759. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity.建成环境对身体活动和主动出行影响的系统文献综述——健康公平性的更新与新发现
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 16;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9.
3
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of the Neighborhood Environment on Recreational Walking within the Neighborhood: Results from RESIDE.
探索规划支持系统弥合公共卫生与城市规划之间研究转化差距的潜力。
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Aug 18;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00291-z.
4
Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of a fluvial environment recovery project in a medium-sized Spanish town.西班牙中型城镇河流环境恢复项目的健康影响评估(HIA)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 25;17(5):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051484.
5
Living liveable? RESIDE's evaluation of the "Liveable Neighborhoods" planning policy on the health supportive behaviors and wellbeing of residents in Perth, Western Australia.宜居生活?RESIDE对西澳大利亚州珀斯“宜居社区”规划政策对居民健康支持行为和福祉的评估。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100538. eCollection 2020 Apr.
邻里环境对邻里内休闲步行影响的纵向分析:RESIDE研究结果
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 12;125(7):077009. doi: 10.1289/EHP823.
4
Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities.土地利用、交通与人口健康:评估紧凑型城市的健康效益。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2925-2935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30067-8. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities.利用科学指导城市规划政策和实践:如何实现健康可持续的未来城市。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2936-2947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30068-X. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
City planning and population health: a global challenge.城市规划与人群健康:全球性挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2912-2924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
The building blocks of a 'Liveable Neighbourhood': Identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.“宜居社区”的构成要素:确定西澳大利亚州珀斯一项运营规划政策中步行的关键绩效指标。
Health Place. 2015 Nov;36:173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
8
Are we developing walkable suburbs through urban planning policy? Identifying the mix of design requirements to optimise walking outcomes from the 'Liveable Neighbourhoods' planning policy in Perth, Western Australia.我们是否正在通过城市规划政策来发展适宜步行的郊区?确定设计要求的组合,以优化西澳大利亚州珀斯市“宜居社区”规划政策下的步行效果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 May 16;12:63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0225-1.
9
Influencing public policies: Two (very good) reasons to look toward scientific knowledge in public policy.影响公共政策:在公共政策中关注科学知识的两个(非常充分的)理由。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 11;106(1 Suppl 1):eS9-11. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.3839.
10
Are liveable neighbourhoods safer neighbourhoods? Testing the rhetoric on new urbanism and safety from crime in Perth, Western Australia.宜居社区是否更安全?检验关于澳大利亚西部珀斯新城市主义与犯罪安全的言辞。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 20.