Buajitti Emmalin, Chiodo Sabrina, Rosella Laura C
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M7, Canada.
ICES, Room G-106, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100553. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100553. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of health, the measurement of which is of great significance to population health research. However, individual-level socioeconomic factors are absent from much health administrative data, resulting in widespread use of area-level measures in their place. This study aims to clarify the role of individual- and area-level socioeconomic status in Ontario, Canada, through comparison of income measures. Using data from four cycles (2005-2012) of the Canadian Community Health Survey, we assessed concordance between individual- and area-level income quintiles using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Individual-level characteristics were compared at baseline. Cumulative adult premature mortality was calculated for 5-years following interview. Rates were calculated separately for area-level and individual-level income, and jointly for each combination of income groups. Multivariable negative binomial models were fit to estimate associations between area- and individual-level income quintile and premature mortality after adjustment for basic demographics (age, sex, interview cycle) and key risk factors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity, and body mass index). Agreement between individual- and area-level income measures was low. Kappa statistics for same and similar (i.e. ±1 quintile) measures were 0.11 and 0.48, indicating low and moderate agreement, respectively. Socioeconomic disparities in premature mortality were greater for individual-level income than area-level income. When rates were stratified by both area- and individual-level income quintiles simultaneously, individual-level income gradients persisted within each area-level income group. The association between income and premature mortality was significant for both measures, including after full adjustment. Area-level socioeconomic status is an inappropriate proxy for missing individual-level data. The low agreement between area- and individual-level income measures and differences in demographic profile indicate that the two socioeconomic status measures do not capture the same population groups. However, our findings demonstrate that both individual- and area-level income measures are associated with premature mortality, and describe unique socioeconomic inequities.
社会经济地位是健康的重要决定因素,对其进行测量对人群健康研究具有重要意义。然而,许多健康管理数据中缺少个体层面的社会经济因素,导致地区层面的测量方法被广泛用于替代个体层面的测量方法。本研究旨在通过比较收入测量指标,阐明加拿大安大略省个体层面和地区层面社会经济地位的作用。利用加拿大社区健康调查四个周期(2005 - 2012年)的数据,我们使用百分比一致性和卡帕统计量评估个体层面和地区层面收入五分位数之间的一致性。在基线时比较个体层面的特征。计算访谈后5年的累积成人过早死亡率。分别计算地区层面和个体层面收入的死亡率,并针对每个收入组组合共同计算死亡率。拟合多变量负二项式模型,以估计在调整基本人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、访谈周期)和关键风险因素(饮酒、吸烟、身体活动和体重指数)后,地区层面和个体层面收入五分位数与过早死亡率之间的关联。个体层面和地区层面收入测量指标之间的一致性较低。相同和相似(即±1个五分位数)测量指标的卡帕统计量分别为0.11和0.48,分别表明一致性较低和中等。个体层面收入导致的过早死亡率社会经济差异大于地区层面收入导致的差异。当按地区层面和个体层面收入五分位数同时进行分层时,个体层面的收入梯度在每个地区层面收入组内持续存在。收入与过早死亡率之间的关联对于两种测量指标均具有显著性,包括在完全调整之后。地区层面的社会经济地位不适用于替代缺失的个体层面数据。地区层面和个体层面收入测量指标之间的低一致性以及人口统计学特征的差异表明,这两种社会经济地位测量指标并未涵盖相同的人群组。然而,我们的研究结果表明,个体层面和地区层面的收入测量指标均与过早死亡率相关,并描述了独特的社会经济不平等现象。