Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryXijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;44(3):788-796. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01630-4. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Improving periorbital aging is, currently, of great concern. The previous literature has reported some surgical methods for periorbital aging. The purpose of this study was to compare subbrow blepharoplasty (SBB) with subbrow blepharoplasty combined with periorbital muscle manipulation (SBB-pm) with regard to improving periorbital aging.
A prospective, randomized, controlled study was designed to evaluate and compare the effects of two different surgical techniques on upper lid relaxation, brow shape and periorbital wrinkles. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent resection of excess skin; group 2 underwent a modified technique that involved resection of an elliptical island of skin, separation of the corrugator supercilii muscle and dissection of the orbicularis oculi muscle, followed by suturing it to the orbital periosteum and cross-fixation with itself. The upper eyelid and eyebrow height, periorbital wrinkle score and patient satisfaction were measured preoperatively and postoperatively.
This study included 70 patients (140 eyes). At 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery, group 2 was superior to group 1 with regard to the improvement in upper eyelid relaxation at the medial limbus, middle pupil and lateral canthus. The eyebrow assumed a low and flat appearance in group 1. The eyebrow showed a low and flat appearance and then returned to the preoperative level in group 2. When comparing the two surgical techniques, the authors found statistically significant differences in regard to changes in crow's feet and glabellar frown lines. Two patients in group 2 experienced forehead numbness after surgery, which resolved by the 6-month follow-up. Patients in group 2 were significantly more satisfied with their surgery than patients in group 1.
SBB-pm is more effective than SBB for improving upper eyelid relaxation and preventing secondary brow ptosis after surgery as well as for alleviating periorbital wrinkles, although it is accompanied by transient forehead numbness.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
改善眶周老化是目前非常关注的问题。既往文献报道了一些眶周老化的手术方法。本研究旨在比较眉下睑成形术(SBB)与眉下睑成形术联合眶周肌操作(SBB-pm)在改善眶周老化方面的效果。
设计了一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,评估和比较两种不同手术技术对上睑松弛、眉形和眶周皱纹的影响。患者分为两组。第 1 组行多余皮肤切除术;第 2 组行改良术式,切除椭圆形岛状皮肤,分离皱眉肌并解剖眼轮匝肌,然后将其缝合至眶骨膜并交叉固定。术前和术后测量上睑和眉弓高度、眶周皱纹评分和患者满意度。
本研究纳入 70 例(140 只眼)患者。术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月,第 2 组在内眦、瞳孔中部和外眦改善上睑松弛方面优于第 1 组。第 1 组眉弓呈低平外观,第 2 组眉弓呈低平外观,然后恢复术前水平。比较两种手术技术时,作者发现鱼尾纹和眉间皱眉线的变化有统计学差异。第 2 组 2 例患者术后出现额部麻木,随访至 6 个月时缓解。第 2 组患者对手术的满意度明显高于第 1 组。
与 SBB 相比,SBB-pm 更有效地改善上睑松弛,预防术后继发性眉下垂,缓解眶周皱纹,但伴有短暂性额部麻木。
证据水平 II:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266。