• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

藻酸盐衍生羟磷灰石作为骨生物材料的行为与无机牛骨的比较:一项在人类中进行的随机分组、临床、放射学和组织学的口腔内研究。

Algae-derived hydroxyapatite behavior as bone biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone: A split-mouth clinical, radiological, and histologic randomized study in humans.

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Pathology and IBIMER, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):536-548. doi: 10.1111/clr.13590. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13590
PMID:32072685
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze a modified biphasic phycogenic biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus floor elevation in humans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight male patients in need of bilateral two-stage sinus floor elevation were consecutively recruited for this randomized split-mouth study. A combination of autogenous cortical bone (ACB, 20%) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB, 80%) (ACB + ABB group) or ACB (20%) and modified biphasic phycogenic material (BP, 80%) (ACB + BP group) were randomly assigned to graft each sinus. Patients were followed up for 6 months post-surgery when bone samples were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Radiographically, bone height gain was statistically higher in the ACB + ABB versus the ACB + BP group. While the analysis of the biological compartments showed differences in non-mineralized tissue (39.15 ± 20.97% vs. 65.87 ± 28.59%, ACB + ABB vs. ACB + BP respectively; p = .018) and remnant biomaterial particles (22.62 ± 17.01% vs. 7.96 ± 8.57%, respectively; p = .028), the percentage of mineralized tissue (38.23 ± 17.55% vs. 24.14 ± 24.66%, respectively; p = .398) showed no statistically significant difference. In contrast, ACB + ABB biopsies showed higher Musashi-1-positive cells per mm compared to ACB + BP biopsies (811.49 ± 875.30 vs. 236.90 ± 280.81; p < .018), where the fusiform cells corresponded mainly with fibroblasts, as demonstrated by ultrastructural analysis.

CONCLUSION

Both combinations of materials exhibited bone formation after 6 months of healing in the maxillary sinus cavity. However, the combination with biphasic phycogenic biomaterial induced a higher radiographical vertical resorption and graft collapse in comparison with the combination with anorganic bovine bone, possibly due to a higher remodeling of the graft.

摘要

目的

分析一种改良的双相藻源生物材料与无机牛骨在人类上颌窦底提升中的比较。

材料和方法

连续招募了 8 名需要双侧两阶段窦底提升的男性患者进行这项随机分组的分口研究。将自体皮质骨(ACB,20%)和无机牛骨(ABB,80%)(ACB+ABB 组)或 ACB(20%)和改良的双相藻源材料(BP,80%)(ACB+BP 组)混合后随机填入每个窦腔。术后 6 个月采集骨样本进行分析时,对患者进行随访。

结果

影像学上,ACB+ABB 组的骨高度增加明显高于 ACB+BP 组。然而,生物区室分析显示,非矿化组织(ACB+ABB 组为 39.15±20.97%,ACB+BP 组为 65.87±28.59%;p=0.018)和残留生物材料颗粒(ACB+ABB 组为 22.62±17.01%,ACB+BP 组为 7.96±8.57%;p=0.028)存在差异,矿化组织的百分比(ACB+ABB 组为 38.23±17.55%,ACB+BP 组为 24.14±24.66%;p=0.398)无统计学差异。相比之下,ACB+ABB 活检中的 Musashi-1 阳性细胞数 per mm 高于 ACB+BP 活检(811.49±875.30 与 236.90±280.81;p<0.018),超微结构分析表明,其中梭形细胞主要为成纤维细胞。

结论

两种材料组合在上颌窦腔内愈合 6 个月后均有骨形成。然而,与无机牛骨相比,双相藻源生物材料组合导致更高的影像学垂直吸收和移植物塌陷,可能是由于移植物的更高重塑。

相似文献

1
Algae-derived hydroxyapatite behavior as bone biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone: A split-mouth clinical, radiological, and histologic randomized study in humans.藻酸盐衍生羟磷灰石作为骨生物材料的行为与无机牛骨的比较:一项在人类中进行的随机分组、临床、放射学和组织学的口腔内研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):536-548. doi: 10.1111/clr.13590. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
2
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.上颌窦底提升术比较牛骨与猪骨异种移植物混合自体骨移植。一项随机对照的分口研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):524-536. doi: 10.1111/clr.13912. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective non-randomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial.上颌窦植骨中无机牛骨(ABB)与自体骨(AB)加ABB的比较:一项前瞻性非随机临床和组织形态计量学试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):1043-50. doi: 10.1111/clr.12396. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
Histopathological comparison of healing after maxillary sinus augmentation using xenograft mixed with autogenous bone versus allograft mixed with autogenous bone.使用异种骨混合自体骨与同种异体骨混合自体骨进行上颌窦提升后愈合的组织病理学比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Feb;29(2):192-201. doi: 10.1111/clr.13098. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation.上颌窦提升术后取自原始骨和复合骨移植物活检的组织形态计量学比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01814.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
6
Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.烧结纳米羟基磷灰石与无机牛骨异种移植物在上颌窦植骨中的组织学和组织形态计量学比较:一项随机对照的分口临床试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9489825. doi: 10.1155/2017/9489825. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
7
Biphasic hydroxyapatite and ß-tricalcium phosphate biomaterial behavior in a case series of maxillary sinus augmentation in humans.双相羟磷灰石和 β-磷酸三钙生物材料在人类上颌窦提升中的应用:病例系列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Apr;30(4):336-343. doi: 10.1111/clr.13419. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
8
Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.使用Bio-Oss或Straumann骨陶瓷进行上颌窦植骨:一项随机对照多中心临床试验的组织形态计量学结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x.
9
Physico-chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage.一种可供人类使用的新型牛骨矿物质基质的物理化学和生物学特性
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Apr;25(2):370-380. doi: 10.1111/cid.13184. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
10
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Calcium Phosphate Double-Coated Anorganic Bovine Bone: Comparative Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial With Histological and Radiographic Evaluation.采用磷酸钙双层涂布的异体牛骨进行上颌窦提升术:具有组织学和影像学评估的多中心随机对照临床试验比较。
Implant Dent. 2019 Feb;28(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000844.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of porcine and bovine bone xenografts in bone grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.猪和牛异种骨移植在骨移植中的比较评价:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Jun 9;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00630-w.
2
Efficacy of Different Materials for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Lateral Approach. A Systematic Review.外侧入路不同材料用于上颌窦底提升术的疗效:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70053. doi: 10.1111/cid.70053.
3
Novel Applications of Natural Biomaterials in Dentistry-Properties, Uses, and Development Perspectives.
天然生物材料在牙科领域的新应用——特性、用途及发展前景
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 5;18(9):2124. doi: 10.3390/ma18092124.
4
Osseointegration Potential Assessment of Bone Graft Materials Loaded with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Peri-Implant Bone Defects.负载间充质干细胞的骨移植材料在种植体周围骨缺损中的骨整合潜力评估。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 10;25(2):862. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020862.
5
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.上颌窦底提升术比较牛骨与猪骨异种移植物混合自体骨移植。一项随机对照的分口研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):524-536. doi: 10.1111/clr.13912. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study.上颌窦侧壁增宽术后同一窦内不同部位新骨形成是否存在差异?一项前瞻性组织形态计量学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Mar;33(3):322-332. doi: 10.1111/clr.13891. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.口腔领域中的骨移植材料和替代品:当前趋势和进展的综述。
Molecules. 2021 May 18;26(10):3007. doi: 10.3390/molecules26103007.
8
Biomimetic Aspects of Oral and Dentofacial Regeneration.口腔及牙颌面再生的仿生学研究
Biomimetics (Basel). 2020 Oct 12;5(4):51. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics5040051.