Suppr超能文献

急性尿潴留:选用哪种导尿管?

Acute urinary retention: which catheter?

作者信息

Allardice J T, Standfield N J, Wyatt A P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Brook Hospital, London.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):366-8.

Abstract

There is no scientific data on which is the best method and catheter to use in acute urinary retention in males. We therefore compared the efficiency of a size 12 G latex rubber balloon catheter with a similar calibre but more expensive catheter made of polyvinyl-chloride (PVC). A total of 50 patients was studied and a 100% successful catheterisation rate was recorded at first attempt with both catheters, with no significant complications. The importance of the correct management of acute urinary retention, especially adequate analgesia, is stressed and it is concluded that either catheter is satisfactory.

摘要

目前尚无科学数据表明在男性急性尿潴留中使用哪种方法和导管最佳。因此,我们比较了12G乳胶橡胶导尿管与口径相似但更昂贵的聚氯乙烯(PVC)导管的有效性。共研究了50例患者,两种导管首次尝试时的插管成功率均为100%,且无明显并发症。强调了正确处理急性尿潴留的重要性,尤其是充分镇痛,并得出结论:两种导管均令人满意。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Acute urinary retention: causes and treatment.急性尿潴留:病因与治疗
Postgrad Med. 1982 Feb;71(2):221-6. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1982.11715998.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验