• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有机食品及其供应商的诚信:各链条中的欺诈漏洞

Integrity of Organic Foods and Their Suppliers: Fraud Vulnerability Across Chains.

作者信息

van Ruth Saskia M, de Pagter-de Witte Leontien

机构信息

Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Wageningen Food Safety Research, part of Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Foods. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):188. doi: 10.3390/foods9020188.

DOI:10.3390/foods9020188
PMID:32074949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074398/
Abstract

Organic foods are frequently targeted by fraudsters. Examination of underlying factors helps to reduce fraud vulnerability and to prevent fraud. In this study, the fraud vulnerability of five actors from each of four chains were examined using the SSAFE food fraud vulnerability assessment tool: the organic banana, egg, olive oil and pork supply chains. The organic chains appeared slightly less vulnerable than conventional chains due to fewer opportunities for fraud and the more adequate controls being present. On the other hand, organic chains were associated with enhanced vulnerability resulting from cultural and behavioral drivers. Generally, actors in the organic olive oil and pork chains were more vulnerable than those from the banana and egg chains. However, high risk actors were not limited to particular chains. Across the whole group of actors in organic chains, three groups in terms of cultural/behavioral drivers were distinguished: a low vulnerability group, a group facing more external threats and a group presenting fraud vulnerability in general and in particular from within their own company. Ethical business culture and criminal history scores of businesses correlated significantly. This implies that the climate in a company is an important factor to consider when estimating the exposure of businesses to food fraud.

摘要

有机食品经常成为欺诈者的目标。对潜在因素进行审查有助于降低欺诈风险并预防欺诈行为。在本研究中,使用SSAFE食品欺诈风险评估工具对四个供应链中每个供应链的五个行为主体的欺诈风险进行了审查:有机香蕉、鸡蛋、橄榄油和猪肉供应链。由于欺诈机会较少且存在更充分的控制措施,有机供应链的风险似乎略低于传统供应链。另一方面,有机供应链因文化和行为驱动因素而导致风险增加。一般来说,有机橄榄油和猪肉供应链中的行为主体比香蕉和鸡蛋供应链中的行为主体更容易受到影响。然而,高风险行为主体并不局限于特定的供应链。在有机供应链的所有行为主体中,根据文化/行为驱动因素可分为三类:低风险组、面临更多外部威胁的组以及总体上尤其是在其公司内部存在欺诈风险的组。企业的道德商业文化和犯罪历史得分显著相关。这意味着在评估企业面临食品欺诈的风险时,公司的氛围是一个需要考虑的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/f62787c594d7/foods-09-00188-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/4b696064355a/foods-09-00188-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/f5df39b7b2cd/foods-09-00188-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/f62787c594d7/foods-09-00188-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/4b696064355a/foods-09-00188-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/f5df39b7b2cd/foods-09-00188-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/993d/7074398/f62787c594d7/foods-09-00188-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrity of Organic Foods and Their Suppliers: Fraud Vulnerability Across Chains.有机食品及其供应商的诚信:各链条中的欺诈漏洞
Foods. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):188. doi: 10.3390/foods9020188.
2
Food fraud threats in UK post-harvest seafood supply chains; an assessment of current vulnerabilities.英国收获后海鲜供应链中的食品欺诈威胁;当前脆弱性评估。
NPJ Sci Food. 2024 May 27;8(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00272-z.
3
Which Company Characteristics Make a Food Business at Risk for Food Fraud?哪些公司特征会使食品企业面临食品欺诈风险?
Foods. 2021 Apr 13;10(4):842. doi: 10.3390/foods10040842.
4
Feeding fiction: Fraud vulnerability in the food service industry.虚构的供餐:食品服务行业的欺诈漏洞。
Food Res Int. 2020 Jul;133:109158. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109158. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment in the Chinese Baijiu Supply Chain.中国白酒供应链中的食品欺诈脆弱性评估
Foods. 2023 Jan 23;12(3):516. doi: 10.3390/foods12030516.
6
Considering Fraud Vulnerability Associated with Credence-Based Products Such as Organic Food.考虑与有机食品等基于信任的产品相关的欺诈漏洞。
Foods. 2021 Aug 14;10(8):1879. doi: 10.3390/foods10081879.
7
Food inauthenticity: Authority activities, guidance for food operators, and mitigation tools.食品非真实性:监管机构的活动、食品经营者的指南和减轻工具。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022 Nov;21(6):4776-4811. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13053. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
Fraud vulnerability quantitative assessment of Wuchang rice industrial chain in China based on AHP-EWM and ANN methods.基于层次分析法-熵权物元模型和神经网络方法的中国武昌稻米产业链欺诈脆弱性定量评估。
Food Res Int. 2021 Feb;140:109805. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109805. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
A sense of ginger fraud: prevalence and deconstruction of the China-European union supply chain.生姜欺诈之感:中国-欧盟供应链的流行情况与剖析
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Nov 4;6(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00166-y.
10
Food fraud and mitigating strategies of UK food supply chain during COVID-19.英国食品供应链在新冠疫情期间的食品欺诈及缓解策略
Food Control. 2023 Jun;148:109670. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109670. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Food fraud threats in UK post-harvest seafood supply chains; an assessment of current vulnerabilities.英国收获后海鲜供应链中的食品欺诈威胁;当前脆弱性评估。
NPJ Sci Food. 2024 May 27;8(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00272-z.
2
Authentication of Laying Hen Housing Systems Based on Egg Yolk Using H NMR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning.基于核磁共振氢谱和机器学习技术的蛋鸡饲养系统蛋黄鉴别方法
Foods. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):1098. doi: 10.3390/foods13071098.
3
Results from Türkiye: Which Factors Drive Consumers to Buy Organic Food?来自土耳其的结果:哪些因素促使消费者购买有机食品?

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers.有机食品消费的决定因素。动机和障碍的系统文献综述。
Appetite. 2019 Dec 1;143:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104402. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
2
Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research.有机农业是否能减少环境影响?——欧洲研究的荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 15;112:309-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
Foods. 2024 Jan 18;13(2):302. doi: 10.3390/foods13020302.
4
Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment in the Chinese Baijiu Supply Chain.中国白酒供应链中的食品欺诈脆弱性评估
Foods. 2023 Jan 23;12(3):516. doi: 10.3390/foods12030516.
5
Metabolomic profiling to detect different forms of beef fraud using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS).利用快速蒸发电离质谱法(REIMS)进行代谢组学分析以检测牛肉欺诈的不同形式。
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Jan 27;6(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00125-7.
6
Considering Fraud Vulnerability Associated with Credence-Based Products Such as Organic Food.考虑与有机食品等基于信任的产品相关的欺诈漏洞。
Foods. 2021 Aug 14;10(8):1879. doi: 10.3390/foods10081879.
7
Appropriate sampling methods and statistics can tell apart fraud from pesticide drift in organic farming.合适的采样方法和统计数据可以区分有机农业中的欺诈和农药漂移。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93624-8.
8
Which Company Characteristics Make a Food Business at Risk for Food Fraud?哪些公司特征会使食品企业面临食品欺诈风险?
Foods. 2021 Apr 13;10(4):842. doi: 10.3390/foods10040842.