Suppr超能文献

根据血管直径,在所有患者人群中使用药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。

Results of PCI with Drug-Eluting Stents in an All-Comer Population Depending on Vessel Diameter.

作者信息

Dola Janusz, Morawiec Beata, Wańha Wojciech, Nowalany-Kozielska Ewa, Wojakowski Wojciech, Kawecki Damian

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.

3rd Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):524. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020524.

Abstract

Long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) depends on vessel diameter; however, there is insufficient evidence on particular drug-eluting stent (DES) types in this setting. The aim of the study was to assess long-term performance of PCI depending on stented vessel size and DES generations. This observational study from a prospective Registry of PCI with DES assessed safety (stent thrombosis) and efficacy (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)) of the implantation of first- (DES1) or second-generation DESs (DES2) in small and large vessels. Of 699 patients included in the analysis, 337 (48%) patients underwent PCI in small vessels. PCI in small vessels, especially the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-4.5), was associated with a higher rate of MACCEs than that in large vessels (20% vs. 14%, = 0.025) with no difference in the rate of stent thrombosis (ST). No significant difference in safety and efficacy was found between DES1 and DES2 in small vessels. For large vessels, a higher incidence of MACCEs (21% vs. 9.2%, = 0.002) driven by a higher rate of re-PCI (15% vs. 6%, = 0.006) and a higher rate of cumulative stent thrombosis (3.5% vs. 0.5%, = 0.04) was shown for DES1 than DES2. In multivariate analysis, DES1 was a significant risk factor for MACCEs in large, but not in small vessels. The risk of PCI in small vessels, especially LAD, remains high independent of the type of DES. In contrast, DES2 as a modifiable variable during PCI of a large lesion might improve long-term prognosis.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的长期预后取决于血管直径;然而,在这种情况下,关于特定药物洗脱支架(DES)类型的证据并不充分。本研究的目的是评估根据支架置入血管大小和DES代数的PCI长期性能。这项来自DES前瞻性PCI注册研究的观察性研究评估了第一代(DES1)或第二代DES(DES2)在小血管和大血管中植入的安全性(支架血栓形成)和有效性(主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE))。在纳入分析的699例患者中,337例(48%)患者在小血管中接受了PCI。小血管PCI,尤其是左前降支(LAD)(风险比(HR)2.6,95%置信区间(CI)1.5 - 4.5),与MACCE发生率高于大血管(20%对14%,P = 0.025)相关,而支架血栓形成(ST)发生率无差异。在小血管中,DES1和DES2之间在安全性和有效性方面未发现显著差异。对于大血管,DES1显示出比DES2更高的MACCE发生率(21%对9.2%,P = 0.002),这是由更高的再次PCI发生率(15%对6%,P = 0.006)和更高的累积支架血栓形成率(3.5%对0.5%,P = 0.04)驱动的。在多变量分析中,DES1是大血管而非小血管中MACCE的显著危险因素。小血管PCI的风险,尤其是LAD,无论DES类型如何仍然很高。相比之下,DES2作为大病变PCI期间的一个可改变变量可能会改善长期预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb8/7073995/1ba7823db262/jcm-09-00524-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验