Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Int J Neurosci. 2021 Jan;131(1):70-84. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1732967. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability.Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83-4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60-2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17-1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05-9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02-33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09-0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04-2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34-1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01-0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01-0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37-1.24)]. Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.
癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种常见的神经急症。本研究对评估静脉用丙戊酸钠(VPA)在 SE 中的应用的已发表随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析。全面检索了 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 数据库,同时手动筛选了检索到的 RCT 和荟萃分析。预设的结局指标包括癫痫发作停止、24 小时疗效、构成(肝酶升高、心律失常、骨髓抑制、低血压和呼吸抑制)和严重(危及生命)不良事件(AE)。当试验之间存在异质性时(当 PQ > 0.1 和 I < 50% 时假设同质性),使用随机效应(RE)或固定效应(FE)模型适当进行证据综合。使用优势比(ORs)和 95%置信区间(95% CIs)评估结局。评估了每一种可用的比较方法的疗效和耐受性。共检索到 13 项研究,其中 5 项比较可用,其中 4 项涉及两项或两项以上的研究。结果与 VPA 和苯妥英钠在疗效和耐受性方面均无显著差异[癫痫发作停止:FE-OR = 1.99,95%CI =(0.83-4.75),24 小时疗效:FE-OR = 1.32,95%CI =(0.60-2.89),复合 AE:FE-OR = 0.45,95%CI =(0.17-1.21)]。苯巴比妥与复合 AE 的相关性较 VPA 更为常见[癫痫发作停止:RE-OR = 0.68,95%CI =(0.05-9.44),24 小时疗效:RE-OR = 0.88,95%CI =(0.02-33.9),复合 AE:FE-OR = 0.26,95%CI =(0.09-0.82),严重 AE:FE-OR = 0.30,95%CI =(0.04-2.28)]。与 VPA 相比,地西泮在安全性方面较差[癫痫发作停止:FE-OR = 0.77,95%CI =(0.34-1.79),严重呼吸抑制:FE-OR = 0.06,95%CI =(0.01-0.48),严重低血压:FE-OR = 0.09,95%CI =(0.01-0.72)]。劳拉西泮(LZP)与 VPA 联合使用和 LZP 与左乙拉西坦联合使用在疗效方面没有差异[24 小时疗效:FE-OR = 0.68,95%CI =(0.37-1.24)]。尽管需要更多高质量的 RCT,但根据我们的结果,VPA 可被视为治疗 SE 的一种安全有效的选择。