• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

65 岁以上女性起始使用甘精胰岛素、地特胰岛素和 NPH 胰岛素的乳腺癌风险相似。

Similar Breast Cancer Risk in Women Older Than 65 Years Initiating Glargine, Detemir, and NPH Insulins.

机构信息

Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

Acumen LLC, Burlingame, CA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):785-792. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0614. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

DOI:10.2337/dc19-0614
PMID:32075848
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether initiation of insulin glargine (glargine), compared with initiation of NPH or insulin detemir (detemir), was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in women with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective new-user cohort study of female Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years initiating glargine (203,159), detemir (67,012), or NPH (47,388) from September 2006 to September 2015, with follow-up through May 2017. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for incidence of breast cancer according to ever use, cumulative duration of use, cumulative dose of insulin, length of follow-up time, and a combination of dose and length of follow-up time.

RESULTS

Ever use of glargine was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with NPH (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.06) or detemir (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92-1.05). No increased risk was seen with glargine use compared with either NPH or detemir by duration of insulin use, length of follow-up, or cumulative dose of insulin. No increased risk of breast cancer was observed in medium- or high-dose glargine users compared with low-dose users.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, glargine use was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with NPH or detemir in female Medicare beneficiaries.

摘要

目的

评估与起始使用 NPH 或胰岛素地特胰岛素相比,起始使用甘精胰岛素是否会增加女性糖尿病患者罹患乳腺癌的风险。

研究设计和方法

这是一项回顾性新使用者队列研究,纳入了 2006 年 9 月至 2015 年 9 月期间≥65 岁的女性 Medicare 受益人群,起始使用甘精胰岛素(203159 例)、地特胰岛素(67012 例)或 NPH(47388 例),随访至 2017 年 5 月。使用加权 Cox 比例风险回归来估计根据是否使用、累计使用时间、胰岛素累积剂量、随访时间长度以及剂量和随访时间长度的组合,乳腺癌发病率的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

与 NPH(HR 0.97;95%CI 0.88-1.06)或地特胰岛素(HR 0.98;95%CI 0.92-1.05)相比,使用甘精胰岛素与乳腺癌风险增加无关。与 NPH 或地特胰岛素相比,使用甘精胰岛素的时间、随访时间长度或胰岛素累积剂量均未见乳腺癌风险增加。与低剂量甘精胰岛素使用者相比,中剂量或高剂量甘精胰岛素使用者未观察到乳腺癌风险增加。

结论

总体而言,与 NPH 或地特胰岛素相比,女性 Medicare 受益人群使用甘精胰岛素与乳腺癌风险增加无关。

相似文献

1
Similar Breast Cancer Risk in Women Older Than 65 Years Initiating Glargine, Detemir, and NPH Insulins.65 岁以上女性起始使用甘精胰岛素、地特胰岛素和 NPH 胰岛素的乳腺癌风险相似。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):785-792. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0614. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
2
Treatment persistence after initiating basal insulin in type 2 diabetes patients: A primary care database analysis.2型糖尿病患者起始基础胰岛素治疗后的治疗持续性:一项初级保健数据库分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Oct;9(5):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
3
Insulins NPH, glargine, and detemir, and risk of severe hypoglycemia among working-age adults.中效胰岛素、甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素与工作年龄成年人严重低血糖风险
Ann Med. 2017 Jun;49(4):357-364. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1278302. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
Long-Term Use of Long-Acting Insulin Analogs and Breast Cancer Incidence in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.长期使用长效胰岛素类似物与 2 型糖尿病女性乳腺癌发病风险
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3647-3653. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4491. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
5
Evaluation of the incidence and risk of hypoglycemic coma associated with selection of basal insulin in the treatment of diabetes: a Finnish register linkage study.糖尿病治疗中基础胰岛素选择与低血糖昏迷发生率及风险的评估:一项芬兰登记链接研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1326-35. doi: 10.1002/pds.3534. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin glargine with NPH insulin, premixed insulin preparations or with insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes mellitus.对2型糖尿病中甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素、预混胰岛素制剂或地特胰岛素的疗效和安全性结果进行比较的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Aug;52(4):649-62. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0698-4. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Comparison of Hypoglycemia and Safety Outcomes With Long-Acting Insulins Versus Insulin NPH in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes.长效胰岛素与 NPH 胰岛素治疗孕前和妊娠期糖尿病的低血糖及安全性结局比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;54(7):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1060028019897897. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Severe Hypoglycemia Risk With Long-Acting Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin.长效胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素相比低血糖风险增加。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):598-607. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9176.
9
All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among Users of Basal Insulins NPH, Detemir, and Glargine.中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素、地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素使用者的全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0151910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151910. eCollection 2016.
10
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.基础胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素起始治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊或住院及血糖控制的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):53-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7993.

引用本文的文献

1
The risk of cancer among insulin glargine users in Lithuania: A retrospective population-based study.立陶宛甘精胰岛素使用者的癌症风险:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Open Med (Wars). 2024 Oct 15;19(1):20241017. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1017. eCollection 2024.
2
Real-world evidence: the devil is in the detail.真实世界证据:细节决定成败。
Diabetologia. 2020 Sep;63(9):1694-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05217-1. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Tweeting, tweeting.啾啾,啾啾。
J Diabetes. 2020 Jun;12(6):424-425. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13037. Epub 2020 Mar 27.