Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Providence Health & Services, 5251 NE Glisan St, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Ro, New York, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;47(4):509-525. doi: 10.1007/s11414-020-09691-8.
Research on behavioral health integration (BHI) often explores outcomes for quality and cost, but less is known about impacts of integration work on key patient experience outcomes. A mixed-methods longitudinal study of BHI was conducted in 12 primary care clinics in Oregon to assess how adoption of key integration practices including integrated staffing models, integrated care trainings for providers, and integrated data sharing impacted a set of patient experience outcomes selected and prioritized by an advisory panel of active patients. Results showed that adopting key aspects of integration was not associated with improved patient experience outcomes over time. Patient interviews highlighted several potential reasons why, including an overemphasis by health systems on the structural aspects of integration versus the experiential components and potential concerns among patients about stigma and discrimination in the primary care settings where integration is focused.
关于行为健康整合(BHI)的研究通常探讨质量和成本的结果,但对于整合工作对关键患者体验结果的影响知之甚少。在俄勒冈州的 12 家初级保健诊所进行了一项行为健康整合的混合方法纵向研究,以评估采用包括整合人员配备模式、为提供者提供整合护理培训以及整合数据共享在内的关键整合实践如何影响一组由积极参与的患者顾问小组选择和优先考虑的患者体验结果。结果表明,随着时间的推移,采用整合的关键方面与改善患者体验结果之间没有关联。患者访谈突出了几个潜在的原因,包括卫生系统过于强调整合的结构方面而不是体验方面,以及患者对整合关注的初级保健环境中耻辱和歧视的潜在担忧。