Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Anim Ecol. 2020 May;89(5):1153-1164. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13180. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
To make adaptive foraging decisions, predators need to gather information about the profitability of prey. As well as learning from prey encounters, recent studies show that predators can learn about prey defences by observing the negative foraging experiences of conspecifics. However, predator communities are complex. While observing heterospecifics may increase learning opportunities, we know little about how social information use varies across predator species. Social transmission of avoidance among predators also has potential consequences for defended prey. Conspicuous aposematic prey are assumed to be an easy target for naïve predators, but this cost may be reduced if multiple predators learn by observing single predation events. Heterospecific information use by predators might further benefit aposematic prey, but this remains untested. Here we test conspecific and heterospecific information use across a predator community with wild-caught blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major). We used video playback to manipulate social information about novel aposematic prey and then compared birds' foraging choices in 'a small-scale novel world' that contained novel palatable and aposematic prey items. We expected that blue tits would be less likely to use social information compared to great tits. However, we found that both blue tits and great tits consumed fewer aposematic prey after observing a negative foraging experience of a demonstrator. In fact, this effect was stronger in blue tits compared to great tits. Interestingly, blue tits also learned more efficiently from watching conspecifics, whereas great tits learned similarly regardless of the demonstrator species. Together, our results indicate that social transmission about novel aposematic prey occurs in multiple predator species and across species boundaries. This supports the idea that social interactions among predators can reduce attacks on aposematic prey and therefore influence selection for prey defences.
为了做出适应性的觅食决策,捕食者需要收集有关猎物盈利能力的信息。除了从猎物遭遇中学习外,最近的研究表明,捕食者可以通过观察同种个体的负面觅食经验来了解猎物的防御能力。然而,捕食者群体是复杂的。虽然观察异质种可能会增加学习机会,但我们对不同捕食物种如何利用社会信息知之甚少。捕食者之间的回避行为的社会传递也可能对受保护的猎物产生潜在影响。明显的警戒性猎物被认为是天真捕食者的容易目标,但如果多个捕食者通过观察单一捕食事件来学习,则这种成本可能会降低。捕食者对异质种信息的利用可能会进一步使警戒性猎物受益,但这尚未得到验证。在这里,我们在一个由野生捕获的蓝山雀(Cyanistes caeruleus)和大山雀(Parus major)组成的捕食者社区中测试了同种和异质种信息的利用。我们使用视频播放来操纵关于新警戒性猎物的社会信息,然后比较鸟类在包含新美味和警戒性猎物的“小规模新环境”中的觅食选择。我们预计蓝山雀与大山雀相比,不太可能利用社会信息。然而,我们发现,无论是蓝山雀还是大山雀,在观察到示范者的负面觅食经验后,都会减少对警戒性猎物的消耗。事实上,与大山雀相比,这种影响在蓝山雀中更为强烈。有趣的是,蓝山雀也从观察同种个体中更有效地学习,而大山雀则无论示范者的物种如何,学习方式都相似。总的来说,我们的结果表明,关于新警戒性猎物的社会传递发生在多个捕食物种中,并跨越物种边界。这支持了捕食者之间的社会互动可以减少对警戒性猎物的攻击,从而影响对猎物防御的选择的观点。