Suppr超能文献

通过最佳最差标度法考察求助偏好。

An examination of help-seeking preferences via best-worst scaling.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.

Department of Agriculture, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2020 Sep;76(9):1677-1695. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22945. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study utilized best-worst scaling and latent class analysis to assess mental health treatment preferences and identify subgroups of college student help seekers.

METHOD

College students (N = 504; age: M = 20.3, 79.2% female) completed assessments of mental health treatment preferences, self-stigma, and distress.

RESULTS

Students preferred utilizing friends and family, followed by professional mental health providers, self-help, keeping concerns to themselves, physicians, and lastly religious leaders. Latent class analyses identified four classes of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroups of student help seekers include Formal Help Seekers who prefer professional mental health providers, Informal Help Seekers who prefer friends and family, Ambivalent Help Seekers who prefer family and friends but also keeping concerns to themselves, and Help Avoiders who prefer keeping concerns to themselves. Assessing treatment preferences among different student subgroups may constitute an initial step in identifying effective ways to address university-wide mental health concerns.

摘要

目的

本研究采用最佳最差标度法和潜在类别分析来评估心理健康治疗偏好,并确定大学生求助者亚组。

方法

大学生(N=504;年龄:M=20.3,79.2%为女性)完成了心理健康治疗偏好、自我污名和困扰的评估。

结果

学生们更倾向于利用朋友和家人,其次是专业心理健康提供者、自助、将问题藏在心里、内科医生,最后是宗教领袖。潜在类别分析确定了四个受访者群体。

结论

学生求助者亚组包括:首选专业心理健康提供者的“正式求助者”,首选朋友和家人的“非正式求助者”,既倾向于家人和朋友又倾向于将问题藏在心里的“矛盾求助者”,以及更倾向于将问题藏在心里的“回避求助者”。评估不同学生亚组的治疗偏好可能是确定解决全校心理健康问题的有效方法的初始步骤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验