• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后,与传统方法相比,微创方法可减少术后上肢功能障碍。

Slender versus conventional approach reduces post-procedural upper extremity dysfunction after transradial coronary procedures.

机构信息

OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):66-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28758. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28758
PMID:32077587
Abstract

AIMS

We compared the incidence of post-procedural radial artery occlusion (RAO) and upper extremity dysfunction (UED), in patients undergoing conventional versus slender transradial (TRA) coronary procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

UED was assessed by the QuickDASH, before conventional (i.e., ≥6F) and slender (i.e., "virtual" 3F to 5F) procedures, after 2 weeks and 2 months. RAO was assessed by Duplex in patients with an abnormal reversed Barbeau test (RBT). A total of 212 patients were included, UED after 2 weeks was 12%, and after 2 months 7% (p = <.001). RAO occurred in 3%. Multivariate analysis showed an OR of 0.26 (CI0.08-0.84) for UED at 2 weeks (p = .03) in favor of slender TRA. In patients with RAO, UED did not improve at 2 months (2/5, 40%, p = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of UED after TRA procedures is temporary except for patients with RAO. Slender TRA seems able to reduce short term UED.

摘要

目的

我们比较了常规经桡动脉(TRA)与细径(虚拟 3F 至 5F)TRA 冠状动脉介入治疗后,患者发生术后桡动脉闭塞(RAO)和上肢功能障碍(UED)的发生率。

方法和结果

在常规(即≥6F)和细径(即“虚拟”3F 至 5F)介入治疗前、治疗后 2 周和 2 个月,采用 QuickDASH 评估 UED。RAO 通过 Duplex 检查在异常反向 Barbeau 试验(RBT)的患者中进行评估。共纳入 212 例患者,2 周后 UED 发生率为 12%,2 个月后为 7%(p<0.001)。RAO 发生率为 3%。多变量分析显示,2 周时 UED 的 OR 为 0.26(CI0.08-0.84)(p=0.03),细径 TRA 更有利。在发生 RAO 的患者中,2 个月时 UED 并未改善(5 例中有 2 例,40%,p=0.046)。

结论

TRA 手术后 UED 的发生是暂时的,除非发生 RAO。细径 TRA 似乎能够减少短期 UED。

相似文献

1
Slender versus conventional approach reduces post-procedural upper extremity dysfunction after transradial coronary procedures.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后,与传统方法相比,微创方法可减少术后上肢功能障碍。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):66-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28758. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗后,鞘管大小和止血时间对日本和非日本患者桡动脉通畅率的影响:RAP 和 BEAT(桡动脉通畅率和出血、疗效、不良事件)随机多中心试验的亚研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):844-851. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27526. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的比较:DISCO RADIAL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: (Radial and Ulnar ry Occlusion eta-Analys) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉和尺动脉闭塞及抗凝的影响:(桡动脉和尺动脉闭塞eta 分析)系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 23;6(8):e005430. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005430.
5
Same-day dual radial artery puncture examination in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention and the incidence of radial artery occlusion.需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者当日双侧桡动脉穿刺检查及桡动脉闭塞发生率
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;12(3):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1753944717749738. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
6
The Activated Clotting Time Paradox: Relationship Between Activated Clotting Time and Occlusion of the Radial Artery When Used as Vascular Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.激活凝血时间悖论:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时用作血管通路的桡动脉闭塞与激活凝血时间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008045. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
7
The long-term incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉闭塞的长期发生率及预测因素。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(4):350-6. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0128. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Distal or Traditional Transradial Access Site for Coronary Procedures: A Single-Center, Randomized Study.经远端桡动脉或传统桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心、随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Multicenter Randomized Evaluation of High Versus Standard Heparin Dose on Incident Radial Arterial Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS Study.多中心随机评估高剂量与标准剂量肝素对经桡动脉冠状动脉造影后桡动脉闭塞事件的影响:SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 26;11(22):2241-2250. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
Evaluation of the incidence of radial artery occlusion using different introducer sheaths and hemostasis techniques.评估使用不同导入鞘和止血技术的桡动脉闭塞发生率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep;100(3):387-391. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30328. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Value of the DASH Tool for Upper Extremity Dysfunction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.DASH工具对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后上肢功能障碍的预测价值。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Jun 27;13:145-155. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S353895. eCollection 2022.