Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain.
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):535-541. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6584.
Active therapeutic combinations, such as trabectedin and radiotherapy, offer potentially higher dimensional response in second-line treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Dimensional response can be relevant both for symptom relief and for survival.
To assess the combined use of trabectedin and radiotherapy in treating patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1 of this nonrandomized clinical trial followed the classic 3 + 3 design, with planned radiotherapy at a fixed dose of 30 Gy (3 Gy/d for 10 days) and infusion of trabectedin at 1.3 mg/m2 as the starting dose, 1.5 mg/m2 as dose level +1, and 1.1 mg/m2 as dose level -1. Phase 2 followed the Simon optimal 2-stage design. Allowing for type I and II errors of 10%, treatment success was defined as an overall response rate of 35%. This study was conducted in 9 sarcoma referral centers in Spain, France, and Italy from April 13, 2015, to November 20, 2018. Adult patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and having undergone at least 1 previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled. In phase 2, patients fitting inclusion criteria and receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin and the radiotherapy regimen constituted the per-protocol population; those receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin, the safety population.
Trabectedin was administered every 3 weeks in a 24-hour infusion. Radiotherapy was required to start within 1 hour after completion of the first trabectedin infusion (cycle 1, day 2).
The dose-limiting toxic effects of trabectedin (phase 1) and the overall response rate (phase 2) with use of trabectedin plus irradiation in metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.
Eighteen patients (11 of whom were male) were enrolled in phase 1, and 27 other patients (14 of whom were female) were enrolled in phase 2. The median ages of those enrolled in phases 1 and 2 were 42 (range, 23-74) years and 51 (range, 27-73) years, respectively. In phase 1, dose-limiting toxic effects included grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days in 1 patient at the starting dose level and a grade 4 alanine aminotransferase level increase in 1 of 6 patients at the +1 dose level. In phase 2, among 25 patients with evaluable data, the overall response rate was 72% (95% CI, 53%-91%) for local assessment and 60% (95% CI, 39%-81%) for central assessment.
The findings of this study suggest that the recommended dose of trabectedin for use in combination with this irradiation regimen is 1.5 mg/m2. The trial met its primary end point, with a high overall response rate that indicates the potential of this combination therapy for achieving substantial tumor shrinkage beyond first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic, progressing soft-tissue sarcomas.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02275286.
在晚期软组织肉瘤的二线治疗中,诸如替莫唑胺和放疗等积极的联合治疗方案可能会提供更高的维度反应。维度反应对于缓解症状和延长生存时间都很重要。
评估替莫唑胺联合放疗在治疗进展性转移性软组织肉瘤患者中的应用。
设计、地点和参与者:这项非随机临床试验的第一阶段采用经典的 3+3 设计,计划放疗剂量为 30 Gy(3 Gy/d,共 10 天),替莫唑胺起始剂量为 1.3 mg/m2,剂量水平+1为 1.5 mg/m2,剂量水平-1为 1.1 mg/m2。第二阶段采用西蒙最优两阶段设计。考虑到Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类错误率为 10%,治疗成功定义为总缓解率为 35%。这项研究在西班牙、法国和意大利的 9 个肉瘤转诊中心进行,时间为 2015 年 4 月 13 日至 2018 年 11 月 20 日。纳入患有进展性转移性软组织肉瘤且至少接受过一线系统治疗的成年患者。在第二阶段,符合纳入标准并接受至少 1 个周期替莫唑胺和放疗方案的患者构成方案人群;接受至少 1 个周期替莫唑胺的患者构成安全性人群。
替莫唑胺每 3 周静脉输注 24 小时。放疗需要在第 1 次替莫唑胺输注结束后 1 小时内开始(第 1 周期,第 2 天)。
替莫唑胺的剂量限制毒性作用(第 1 阶段)和转移性软组织肉瘤中替莫唑胺联合放疗的总缓解率(第 2 阶段)。
18 名患者(其中 11 名为男性)被纳入第 1 阶段,27 名其他患者(其中 14 名为女性)被纳入第 2 阶段。第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段纳入患者的中位年龄分别为 42 岁(范围:23-74 岁)和 51 岁(范围:27-73 岁)。在第 1 阶段,剂量限制毒性包括 1 名患者在起始剂量水平时出现持续 5 天以上的 4 级中性粒细胞减少症和 6 名患者中 1 名患者的 4 级丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高。在第 2 阶段,在 25 名可评估数据的患者中,局部评估的总缓解率为 72%(95%CI,53%-91%),中央评估的总缓解率为 60%(95%CI,39%-81%)。
这项研究的结果表明,替莫唑胺联合放疗的推荐剂量为 1.5 mg/m2。该试验达到了主要终点,总缓解率较高,表明该联合治疗方案在转移性进展性软组织肉瘤患者中具有较高的潜力,可在一线系统治疗之外实现肿瘤的显著缩小。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02275286。