Asymmetric Operations Sector, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723.
Mil Med. 2020 Mar 2;185(3-4):e414-e421. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz441.
Recent malicious use of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) is a reminder of their severity and ongoing threat. One of the main categories of CWAs is the organophosphate (OP) nerve agents. Presently, there is an urgent need to identify and evaluate OP nerve agent biomarkers that can facilitate identification of exposed individuals post-CWA incident. While exposures to OP nerve agents may be scenario-specific, the public is commonly exposed to OP compounds through the ubiquitous use of OP pesticides, which are chemically related to nerve agents. Therefore, a systematic literature review and methodological quality assessment were conducted for OP pesticide biomarker studies to serve as a baseline to assess if these approaches may be adapted to OP nerve agent exposures.
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify biomarkers of OP pesticide exposures. English language studies of any design that reported primary data on biomarkers for exposures in nonhuman primates or adult human study participants were eligible for inclusion. Using standard criteria for assessing the completeness of reported analytical methods, the quality of study methods was critically evaluated.
A total of 1,044 studies of biomarkers of OP pesticide exposure were identified, of which 75 articles satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies described 143 different analyte/sample matrix combinations: 99 host-based biomarkers, 28 metabolites, 12 pesticides, and 4 adducts. The most commonly reported biomarkers were dialkyl phosphate urinary metabolites (22 studies), blood acetylcholinesterase, and plasma butyrylcholinesterase (26 studies each). None of the assessed quality review criteria were fully addressed by all identified studies, with almost all criteria scoring less than 50%.
Cholinesterase activity may have utility for identifying individuals with exposures surpassing a given threshold of OP nerve agent, but further investigation of how acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase levels correlate with observed patient symptoms may be required to ensure accuracy of results. As CWAs and nerve agents are more readily used, more standardized reporting of biomarker measurements are needed to develop new approaches for OP nerve agent biomarkers.
最近化学战剂(CWA)的恶意使用提醒人们其严重性和持续存在的威胁。CWA 的主要类别之一是有机磷(OP)神经毒剂。目前,迫切需要识别和评估 OP 神经毒剂生物标志物,以帮助确定 CWA 事件后暴露的个体。虽然 OP 神经毒剂的暴露情况可能因情况而异,但公众通常会通过无处不在的 OP 农药接触到 OP 化合物,这些化合物在化学上与神经毒剂有关。因此,对 OP 农药生物标志物研究进行了系统的文献回顾和方法质量评估,作为评估这些方法是否可适用于 OP 神经毒剂暴露的基线。
我们进行了一项系统的文献回顾,以确定 OP 农药暴露的生物标志物。任何设计的英语语言研究,只要报告了非人类灵长类动物或成年人类研究参与者暴露于生物标志物的原始数据,均符合纳入标准。使用评估报告分析方法完整性的标准标准,对研究方法的质量进行了严格评估。
共确定了 1044 项 OP 农药暴露生物标志物研究,其中 75 篇文章符合纳入和排除标准。这些研究描述了 143 种不同的分析物/样本基质组合:99 种宿主生物标志物、28 种代谢物、12 种农药和 4 种加合物。报告最多的生物标志物是二烷基磷酸尿代谢物(22 项研究)、血液乙酰胆碱酯酶和血浆丁酰胆碱酯酶(各 26 项研究)。没有一项评估的质量审查标准得到所有确定研究的完全解决,几乎所有标准的得分都低于 50%。
胆碱酯酶活性可能有助于识别暴露于 OP 神经毒剂超过给定阈值的个体,但可能需要进一步研究乙酰胆碱酯酶和丁酰胆碱酯酶水平与观察到的患者症状的相关性,以确保结果的准确性。随着 CWA 和神经毒剂的使用更加频繁,需要更标准化的生物标志物测量报告,以开发 OP 神经毒剂生物标志物的新方法。