Suppr超能文献

危重病幸存者认知障碍的自然病程:系统综述。

Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine.

Department of Pediatrics.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 15;202(2):193-201. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI.

Abstract

Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51-57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29-41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38-100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15-63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10-78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10-20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78-86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44-52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories.

摘要

长期认知障碍在 ICU 幸存者中很常见,但它的自然史仍不清楚。在这项系统评价中,我们报告了从筛选出的 3350 份记录中的 46 份中提取的 ICU 出院后各个时间点 ICU 幸存者认知障碍的频率。先前的研究使用了一系列认知工具,包括主观评估(10 项研究)、单一或筛选性认知测试,如简易精神状态检查或连线测试 A 和 B(23 项研究)以及全面认知测试(26 项研究)。使用客观评估(54%[95%置信区间(CI),51-57%])而非主观评估(3 个月后:35%[95% CI,29-41%])以及使用全面认知测试而非简易精神状态检查(ICU 出院时:61%[95% CI,38-100%])时,认知障碍的发生率更高。ICU 出院时患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者比混合 ICU 患者认知障碍发生率更高(82%[95% CI,78-86%])。尽管一些研究在多个时间点重复了测试,但测试之间的时间间隔是任意的,取决于个别研究或选择的认知工具的操作限制。总之,ICU 相关认知障碍的发生率和时间轨迹取决于所使用的认知工具的类型以及危重病的病因。未来的研究应该使用现代全面的测试来更好地描绘 ICU 患者亚组认知恢复的自然史,并确定哪些急性疾病和治疗因素与更好的恢复轨迹相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be16/7365360/ad10d5d5fb1f/rccm.201904-0816CIf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验