Moog Philipp, Tinwald Iris, Aitzetmueller Matthias, Bauer Anna-Theresa, Megerle Kai, Machens Hans-Günther, Laszlo Kovacs L, Kuekrek Haydar
From the Department for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität Munich, Munich.
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Nov;85(5):539-545. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002293.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after a total knee replacement that is primarily associated with soft tissue defects. Finding an appropriate therapy for PJI is a major challenge because of the lack of guidelines and research comparing treatment options.
In this study, we retrospectively compared 78 patients who had a knee prosthetic infection within a mean follow-up period of 24 months. Group A received a soft tissue coverage in addition to orthopedic surgical therapy with or without a component replacement (CR) of the prosthesis. Group B received the same orthopedic treatment without plastic surgery for soft tissue coverage.
Only 21% of the patients in group A received a CR compared with 70% in group B (P = 0.0001). In group A, 83% did not have a recurrent infection, and in group B, 57% of the patients had no further infection and regained joint function (P = 0.0376). In group A, only 15% of the patients who received a CR had a significant complication within the follow-up period of 2 years, whereas in group B, 75% of patients exhibiting a major complication (P = 0.0048*).
Soft tissue coverage improves the outcome after PJI of the knee with soft tissue defects. Patients who simultaneously needed plastic surgery for defect coverage and orthopedic surgery for CR had the lowest number of complications overall. Based on the results of this study, a therapy algorithm could be identified considering the soft tissue defect grade leading to the lowest major complication rates and maximizing the outcome of knee prosthesis infection therapies.
人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全膝关节置换术后的一种严重并发症,主要与软组织缺损有关。由于缺乏比较治疗方案的指南和研究,为PJI找到合适的治疗方法是一项重大挑战。
在本研究中,我们回顾性比较了78例在平均24个月随访期内发生膝关节假体感染的患者。A组除接受骨科手术治疗(有或无假体部件置换(CR))外,还接受了软组织覆盖。B组接受相同的骨科治疗,但未进行软组织覆盖的整形手术。
A组仅21%的患者接受了CR,而B组为70%(P = 0.0001)。A组中,83%的患者没有复发感染,而B组中,57%的患者没有进一步感染并恢复了关节功能(P = 0.0376)。在A组中,接受CR的患者在2年随访期内仅有15%出现严重并发症,而在B组中,75%的患者出现主要并发症(P = 0.0048*)。
软组织覆盖可改善伴有软组织缺损的膝关节PJI的治疗效果。同时需要整形手术覆盖缺损和骨科手术进行CR的患者总体并发症数量最少。基于本研究结果,可以确定一种治疗算法,考虑软组织缺损等级,以实现最低的主要并发症发生率,并最大化膝关节假体感染治疗的效果。