Chandra Akhil A, Romanelli Filippo, Tang Alex, Menken Luke, Zhang Maximilian, Feintisch Adam, Liporace Frank A, Yoon Richard S
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Division of Orthopaedic Trauma and Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center - RWJ Barnabas Health, 355 Grand Street, Jersey City, NJ, 07302, USA.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Mar 26;34(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00145-3.
Flap reconstruction with perforator, fasciocutaneous, muscular, and/or free microvascular flaps is utilized to cover wound defects and improve vascularization and antibiotic/nutrient delivery. Flap use in revision procedures for total knee arthroplasty has been explored previously; however, current data are limited and studies comparing healing and complication rates between different flap types are lacking.
A literature review was performed using PubMed on 13 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported healing and complication rates for either gastrocnemius, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi, fasciocutaneous, chimeric, or gracilis flaps in the setting of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The final cohort included gastrocnemius (n = 421, healing rate 73.8%, complication rate 59.9%), gracilis (n = 9, healing rate 93%, complication rate 55.6%), latissimus dorsi (n = 41, healing rate 67%, complication rate 46.3%), rectus abdominis (n = 3, healing rate 100%, complication rate 0%), fasciocutaneous (n = 78, healing rate 70%, complication rate 19.2%), and chimeric flaps (n = 4, healing rate 100%, complication rate 25%). There was no significant difference when comparing healing rates across flap types (p = 0.39). There was a significant difference when comparing complication rates across flap types (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference being noted between gastrocnemius and fasciocutaneous complication rates (p < 0.0001). All other comparisons between flap types by complication rate were not significantly different.
Gastrocnemius flaps are the workhorse flap in the setting of revision TKA, as evidenced by this review. Healing rates did not vary significantly across flap types, which suggests that determining the appropriate flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in revision TKA should be driven by defect size and location as well as physician experience and patient tolerance.
采用穿支皮瓣、筋膜皮瓣、肌皮瓣和/或游离微血管皮瓣进行皮瓣重建,用于覆盖伤口缺损,改善血管化以及抗生素/营养物质输送。此前已探讨了皮瓣在全膝关节置换翻修手术中的应用;然而,目前的数据有限,且缺乏比较不同皮瓣类型愈合率和并发症发生率的研究。
于2022年1月13日使用PubMed进行文献综述。纳入的研究需报告在全膝关节置换翻修术(TKA)中腓肠肌瓣、腹直肌瓣、背阔肌瓣、筋膜皮瓣、嵌合皮瓣或股薄肌瓣的愈合率和并发症发生率。
最终队列包括腓肠肌瓣(n = 421,愈合率73.8%,并发症发生率59.9%)、股薄肌瓣(n = 9,愈合率93%,并发症发生率55.6%)、背阔肌瓣(n = 41,愈合率67%,并发症发生率46.3%)、腹直肌瓣(n = 3,愈合率100%,并发症发生率0%)、筋膜皮瓣(n = 78,愈合率70%,并发症发生率19.2%)和嵌合皮瓣(n = 4,愈合率100%,并发症发生率25%)。比较不同皮瓣类型的愈合率时无显著差异(p = 0.39)。比较不同皮瓣类型的并发症发生率时有显著差异(p < 0.0001),腓肠肌瓣和筋膜皮瓣的并发症发生率之间存在显著差异(p < 0.0001)。皮瓣类型之间并发症发生率的所有其他比较均无显著差异。
本综述表明,在全膝关节置换翻修术中,腓肠肌瓣是主要使用的皮瓣。不同皮瓣类型的愈合率差异不显著,这表明在全膝关节置换翻修术中确定覆盖软组织缺损的合适皮瓣应取决于缺损大小和位置以及医生经验和患者耐受性。