Departments of Orthopaedics (A.L.L., J.A.N., K.E.R., A.B., C.L.S., and A.E.A.), Physical Therapy & Athletic Training (K.B.F. and A.E.A.), and Bioengineering and Biomedical Imaging (K.E.R. and A.E.A.), and the Scientific Computing & Imaging Institute (A.E.A.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 1;102(7):600-608. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01132.
Tibiotalar arthrodesis is a common treatment for end-stage tibiotalar osteoarthritis, and is associated with a long-term risk of concomitant subtalar osteoarthritis. It has been clinically hypothesized that subtalar osteoarthritis following tibiotalar arthrodesis is the product of compensatory subtalar joint hypermobility. However, in vivo measurements of subtalar joint motion following tibiotalar arthrodesis have not been quantified. Using dual-fluoroscopy motion capture, we tested the hypothesis that the subtalar joint of the limb with a tibiotalar arthrodesis would demonstrate differences in kinematics and increased range of motion compared with the subtalar joint of the contralateral, asymptomatic, untreated ankle.
Ten asymptomatic patients who had undergone unilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis at a mean (and standard deviation) of 4.0 ± 1.8 years previously were evaluated during overground walking and a double heel-rise task. The evaluation involved markerless tracking with use of dual fluoroscopy integrated with 3-dimensional computed tomography, which allowed for dynamic measurements of subtalar and tibiotalar dorsiflexion-plantar flexion, inversion-eversion, and internal-external rotation. Range of motion, stance time, swing time, step length, and step width were also measured.
During the early stance phase of walking, the subtalar joint of the limb that had been treated with arthrodesis was plantar flexed (-4.7° ± 3.3°), whereas the subtalar joint of the untreated limb was dorsiflexed (4.6° ± 2.2°). Also, during the early stance phase of walking, eversion of the subtalar joint of the surgically treated limb (0.2° ± 2.3°) was less than that of the untreated limb (4.5° ± 3.2°). During double heel-rise, the treated limb exhibited increased peak subtalar plantar flexion (-7.1° ± 4.1°) compared with the untreated limb (0.2° ± 1.8°).
A significant increase in subtalar joint plantar flexion was found to be a primary compensation during overground walking and a double heel-rise activity following tibiotalar arthrodesis.
Significant subtalar joint plantar flexion compensations appear to occur following tibiotalar arthrodesis. We found an increase in subtalar plantar flexion and considered the potential relationship of this finding with the increased rate of subtalar osteoarthritis that occurs following ankle arthrodesis.
距下关节融合术是治疗终末期距下关节炎的常用方法,但与合并的距下关节炎长期风险相关。临床上假设距下关节融合术后的距下关节炎是距下关节过度活动的代偿产物。然而,距下关节融合术后距下关节运动的体内测量尚未量化。我们使用双荧光透视运动捕捉技术,检验了以下假说,即距下关节融合术肢体的距下关节在运动学上会出现差异,并且与对侧无症状、未经治疗的踝关节相比,活动范围更大。
10 名无症状患者在平均(标准差)4.0±1.8 年前接受了单侧距下关节融合术,在此期间他们接受了地面行走和双跟提踵任务的评估。评估包括使用双荧光透视术与 3 维计算机断层扫描相结合的无标记跟踪,这允许对距下和距下背屈-跖屈、内翻-外翻以及内外旋转进行动态测量。活动范围、站立时间、摆动时间、步长和步宽也进行了测量。
在行走的早期站立阶段,接受融合术治疗的肢体的距下关节处于跖屈位(-4.7°±3.3°),而未接受治疗的肢体的距下关节处于背屈位(4.6°±2.2°)。此外,在行走的早期站立阶段,手术治疗肢体的距下关节外翻(0.2°±2.3°)小于未治疗肢体的距下关节(4.5°±3.2°)。在双跟提踵期间,与未治疗肢体(0.2°±1.8°)相比,治疗肢体的距下关节峰值跖屈增加(-7.1°±4.1°)。
在距下关节融合术后的地面行走和双跟提踵活动中,发现距下关节明显跖屈增加是一种主要代偿。
距下关节融合术后似乎会出现明显的距下关节跖屈代偿。我们发现距下关节跖屈增加,并考虑到这种发现与距下关节炎融合术后发病率增加的潜在关系。