Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jun;43(6):818-829. doi: 10.1177/10711007221078001. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
In vivo measurements of tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion following TAR are unavailable. Using biplane fluoroscopy, we tested the hypothesis that the prosthetic tibiotalar joint and adjacent subtalar joint would demonstrate kinematic and range of motion differences compared to the contralateral untreated limb, and control participants.
Six patients of 41 identified candidates that all underwent unilateral Zimmer TAR (5.4 ± 1.9 years prior) and 6 control participants were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy during overground walking and a double heel-rise activity. Computed tomography scans were acquired; images were segmented and processed to serve as input for model-based tracking of the biplane fluoroscopy data. Measurements included tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics for the TAR, untreated contralateral, and control limbs. Statistical parametric mapping quantified differences in kinematics throughout overground walking and the double heel-rise activity.
Patients with this TAR performed walking and heel-rise activities symmetrically with no significant kinematic differences at the tibiotalar and subtalar joints between limbs. Compared to control participants, patients exhibited reduced dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion that corresponded to decreased peak dorsiflexion, but only in the late stance phase of walking. This reduction in tibiotalar dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion in the TAR group became more apparent with double heel-rise activity.
Patients with a Zimmer TAR had symmetric kinematics during activities of walking and double heel-rise, but they did exhibit minor compensations in tibiotalar kinematics as compared to controls.
The lack of significant kinematic compensation at the subtalar joint may explain why secondary subtalar osteoarthritis is reported as being relatively uncommon in patients with some TAR designs.
目前尚无关于 TAR 后距下关节和距下关节运动的体内测量。本研究采用双平面透视技术,检验了以下假设,即与未治疗的对侧肢体和对照组相比,假体距下关节和相邻距下关节的运动学和活动范围存在差异。
6 名患者(41 名候选者中的 6 名)均接受了单侧 Zimmer TAR(5.4 ± 1.9 年前),6 名对照组参与者在地面行走和双脚跟抬高活动期间接受了双平面透视成像。获取 CT 扫描图像,对图像进行分割和处理,为基于模型的双平面透视数据跟踪提供输入。测量包括 TAR、未治疗的对侧和对照组肢体的距下关节和距下关节运动。统计参数图定量分析了整个地面行走和双脚跟抬高活动中运动学的差异。
接受这种 TAR 的患者在行走和脚跟抬高活动中表现出对称的运动,在距下关节和距下关节之间没有明显的运动学差异。与对照组相比,患者在行走的晚期站立阶段表现出背屈/跖屈活动范围减小,这与峰值背屈减小相对应。在 TAR 组,这种距下关节背屈/跖屈活动范围的减小在双脚跟抬高活动中变得更加明显。
接受 Zimmer TAR 的患者在行走和双脚跟抬高活动中运动学对称,但与对照组相比,他们在距下关节运动学方面确实存在轻微代偿。
距下关节没有明显的运动学代偿可能解释了为什么在某些 TAR 设计中,继发性距下关节炎的报道相对较少。