• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜技术在后右半肝切除术的安全性及可行性。

The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Technology in Right Posterior Sectionectomy.

机构信息

Departments of General Surgery.

Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Apr;30(2):169-172. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000772.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000772
PMID:32080023
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been accepted widely due to its advantages as a minimally invasive surgery, but laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of LRPS by comparing it with open surgical approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2014 and July 2019, 51 patients who underwent right posterior sectionectomy were enrolled in this study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative data. LRPS showed significantly less blood loss (P=0.001) and shorter hospital stay (P=0.002) than open right posterior sectionectomy, but hospital expenses (P=0.382), operative time (P=0.196), surgical margin (P=0.311), the rate of other complications, and the postoperative white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). For hepatocellular carcinoma, the results showed there were no differences in both disease-free survival (P=0.220) and overall survival (P=0.417) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research suggests that LRPS is a safe and feasible surgical procedure that is efficient from an oncological point of view. It may be the preferred choice for lesions in the right posterior hepatic lobe.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术因其微创的优势已被广泛接受,但腹腔镜右后叶切除术(LRPS)很少有报道。我们旨在通过与开放手术方法比较,来探讨 LRPS 的安全性和可行性。

材料与方法

在 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月期间,我们纳入了 51 例接受右后叶切除术的患者进行本研究。比较了两组患者的一般特征、手术细节和术后结果。

结果

术前数据无统计学差异。LRPS 组术中出血量明显少于开放右后叶切除术组(P=0.001),术后住院时间也明显短于开放右后叶切除术组(P=0.002),但两组间住院费用(P=0.382)、手术时间(P=0.196)、手术切缘(P=0.311)、其他并发症发生率、术后白细胞计数、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶和总胆红素无统计学差异(P>0.05)。对于肝细胞癌,两组之间无病生存率(P=0.220)和总生存率(P=0.417)无差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,LRPS 是一种安全可行的手术方法,从肿瘤学角度来看是有效的。对于右后叶肝内病变,它可能是首选的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Technology in Right Posterior Sectionectomy.腹腔镜技术在后右半肝切除术的安全性及可行性。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Apr;30(2):169-172. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000772.
2
Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: single-center experience and technical aspects.腹腔镜右后叶切除术:单中心经验及技术要点
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Feb;404(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1731-9. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for tumors located in right posterior segment: A single institution study.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗右后段肿瘤的单中心研究
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.高容量中心腹腔镜与开放右后段肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2930-2937. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4531-z.
5
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterosuperior liver segments.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝后上叶肝细胞癌的安全性和可行性
World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1202-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2946-3.
6
Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹右后叶切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 13;408(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0.
7
Stapleless laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the Louisville statement by a young liver surgeon.用于肝细胞癌的免钉合腹腔镜左外侧段切除术:一位年轻肝脏外科医生对路易斯维尔声明的重新评估
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 28;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0903-y.
8
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy technology in right hemihepatectomy.腹腔镜技术右半肝切除术的安全性和可行性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 11;9(1):18809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52694-5.
9
The Safety and Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology Assisted Right Posterior Lobe Allied with Part of V and VIII Sectionectomy for Right Hepatic Malignancy Therapy.三维可视化技术辅助右后叶联合Ⅴ段及Ⅷ段部分切除术治疗右肝恶性肿瘤的安全性与可行性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 May;28(5):586-594. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0479. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy on anterolateral liver segments.单孔腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术的长期和短期手术结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2969-2979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07080-7. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open approaches for right anterior sectionectomy.腹腔镜与开放手术行右前叶肝切除术的安全性及可行性对比分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80148-0.
2
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic anatomical left hemihepatectomy along the middle hepatic vein from the head side approach.经头侧入路沿肝中静脉行腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的安全性和可行性。
Front Oncol. 2024 May 24;14:1368678. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368678. eCollection 2024.
3
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy with Glissonean Approach and Modified Hanging Maneuver.
吲哚菁绿荧光成像引导下经 Glissonean 入路和改良悬吊法腹腔镜右后叶切除术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3071-3072. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14904-x. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
4
Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹右后叶切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 13;408(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0.
5
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs. open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜右后叶切除术与开放手术的安全性和可行性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 17;9:1019117. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019117. eCollection 2022.
6
International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.国际多中心倾向评分匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜右后叶切除术。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1513-1520. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab321.
7
Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹尾状叶切除术的安全性和可行性:荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1307-1316. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02055-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection.腹腔镜与开腹尾状叶切除术的安全性和可行性比较分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Sep;405(6):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01928-6. Epub 2020 Jul 9.