Li Wen, Zeng Haitao, Huang Yong
Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80148-0.
Laparoscopic hepatectomy has minimally invasive advantages, but reports on laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS) are rare. Herein, we try to explore the benefits and drawbacks of LRAS by comparing it with open right anterior sectionectomy (ORAS). Between January 2015 and September 2023, 39 patients who underwent LRAS (n = 18) or ORAS (n = 21) were enrolled in the study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. No significant differences in the preoperative data were observed between the two groups. The LRAS group had significantly lesser blood loss (P = 0.019), a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.045), and a higher rate of bile leak (P = 0.039) than the ORAS group. There was no significant difference in the operative time (P = 0.156), transfusion rate (P = 0.385), hospital expenses (P = 0.511), rate of other complications, postoperative white blood cell count, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). Beside, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.351) or overall survival (P = 0.613) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between the two groups. LRAS is a safe and feasible surgical procedure. It may be preferred for lesions in the right anterior lobe of the liver.
腹腔镜肝切除术具有微创优势,但关于腹腔镜右前叶切除术(LRAS)的报道较少。在此,我们试图通过将LRAS与开腹右前叶切除术(ORAS)进行比较,探讨LRAS的利弊。2015年1月至2023年9月,39例行LRAS(n = 18)或ORAS(n = 21)的患者纳入本研究。比较两组患者的特征、术中细节及术后结果。两组术前数据无显著差异。与ORAS组相比,LRAS组术中出血量显著更少(P = 0.019),住院时间更短(P = 0.045),胆漏发生率更高(P = 0.039)。两组手术时间(P = 0.156)、输血率(P = 0.385)、住院费用(P = 0.511)、其他并发症发生率、术后白细胞计数以及丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平无显著差异(P > 0.05)。此外,两组肝细胞癌患者的无病生存期(P = 0.351)或总生存期(P = 0.613)无显著差异。LRAS是一种安全可行的手术方法。对于肝右前叶病变可能更适用。