Li Peng, He Xue-Qian, Dong Jie, Du Jing
Department of Gastroenterology.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19208. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019208.
Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy.
Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects.
In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74-2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96-1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events.
The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe.
充分的肠道准备对于结肠镜检查的质量至关重要。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定在结肠镜检查前的肠道准备过程中添加鲁比前列酮的有效性和安全性。
检索在线数据库,即PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆,以查找评估鲁比前列酮对接受结肠镜检查患者的肠道准备质量的附加效果的随机对照试验。每项纳入研究均通过Jadad评分进行评估,以评估研究质量。主要结局是肠道准备效果,定义为准备良好或不佳的患者比例。次要结局包括结肠镜检查的时长、息肉检出率以及任何不良反应。
总共5篇在2008年至2016年间发表的文章符合入选标准。在肠道清洁过程中添加鲁比前列酮显著提高了准备良好的患者比例(风险比[RR]=1.68,95%置信区间[CI]:1.40-2.02,P<.00001),但并未缩短检查时间或提高息肉检出率(平均差=-0.52,95%CI:-3.74-2.69,P=.75;RR=1.16,95%CI:0.96-1.42,P=.13)。发生任何不良事件的患者比例无显著差异。
在结肠镜检查前的肠道准备方案中添加鲁比前列酮是有效且安全的。