Suppr超能文献

鲁比前列酮联合聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液(PEG-ELS)与 PEG-ELS 用于慢性便秘肠道准备的随机对照试验。

Lubiprostone plus polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) versus PEG-ELS for bowel preparation in chronic constipation: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

GI Endoscopy Srinagarind Center of Excellence, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43598-6.

Abstract

Colonoscopy is considered the standard procedure for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. Adequate bowel cleansing is an important determinant of the efficacy of colonoscopy screening. Currently, there is no standard method of bowel preparation for patients with chronic constipation. The aim was to access the rate of adequate bowel cleansing achieved using split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus lubiprostone in comparison with split-dose PEG-ELS alone. A single-centre, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-eight constipated patients aged 18-75 years who were indicated for colonoscopy in the gastroenterology unit of Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, between February 2020 and February 2021 were randomly allocated to receive either split-dose PEG-ELS in combination with lubiprostone (N = 39) or split-dose PEG-ELS alone (N = 39) before colonoscopy. Adequate bowel cleansing was defined as an Ottawa bowel preparation score ≤ 7. The rate of adequate bowel cleansing was comparable between the PEG-ELS plus lubiprostone group and the PEG-ELS alone group (50% vs. 52.9%, p value = 0.81) with a relative risk of 1.13 (95% CI = 0.43-2.91). There were no significant differences in adenoma detection rate (41.2% vs. 35.3%, p value = 0.62), adverse events, acceptance, compliance, or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. No additional benefit to successful bowel preparation was achieved by the combination of lubiprostone and PEG-ELS in chronic constipation patients undergoing colonoscopy.

摘要

结肠镜检查被认为是早期发现和预防结直肠癌的标准程序。充分的肠道清洁是结肠镜检查筛查效果的重要决定因素。目前,对于慢性便秘患者,尚无标准的肠道准备方法。本研究旨在评估与单独使用聚乙二醇电解质散(PEG-ELS)相比,PEG-ELS 加鲁比前列酮分剂量给药在实现充分肠道清洁方面的效果。这是一项单中心、内镜医师盲法、随机对照试验。2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 2 月期间,在泰国孔敬大学斯里那加林医院的消化内科,对 78 例年龄在 18-75 岁之间、需要行结肠镜检查的慢性便秘患者进行了研究,将其随机分为接受 PEG-ELS 联合鲁比前列酮(n=39)或单独接受 PEG-ELS(n=39)分剂量给药的两组。充分的肠道清洁定义为渥太华肠道准备评分≤7。PEG-ELS 加鲁比前列酮组和单独使用 PEG-ELS 组的充分肠道清洁率相当(50%比 52.9%,p 值=0.81),相对风险为 1.13(95%CI=0.43-2.91)。两组间腺瘤检出率(41.2%比 35.3%,p 值=0.62)、不良事件、接受程度、顺应性或患者满意度均无显著差异。在接受结肠镜检查的慢性便秘患者中,鲁比前列酮和 PEG-ELS 的联合使用并未带来成功肠道准备的额外益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7316/10533515/9e60eb4229a3/41598_2023_43598_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验