• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确保供者安全:将治疗性献血者的血红蛋白水平降至低于血库指南安全吗?

Ensuring donor safety: is venesecting therapeutic donors to haemoglobin levels below Blood Service guidelines safe?

机构信息

Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospital Group, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2020 May;115(4):288-292. doi: 10.1111/vox.12900. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1111/vox.12900
PMID:32080874
Abstract

Therapeutic phlebotomy is the cornerstone of treatment for HFE haemochromatosis (HH). Current Australian Red Cross LifeBlood Service guidelines mandate measuring haemoglobin (Hb) levels prior to phlebotomy and if below 130 g/l in men or 120 g/l in women, donors are deferred from donating whole blood. Therapeutic donation below these levels may take place where both the treating doctor and a blood service medical officer approve. The aim of the current study was to determine whether adverse events are more frequent in those who undergo therapeutic phlebotomy below current Hb thresholds applied to volunteer therapeutic donors. A retrospective review of all therapeutic donations was undertaken for the financial year 2016-2017. The data were obtained through the Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Inclusion criteria were any donor between 16 and 70 years of age, weighing more than 50 kg and meeting blood service guidelines for donation. All adverse events recorded in an electronic quality system were obtained and associated with donor haemoglobin level. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance or Fisher's exact test (GraphPad Prism). About 34 886 therapeutic phlebotomy donations occurred during 2016-2017, of whom the majority were referred for HH (34 089). In total, 365 of 34 886 donations (0·0105%) were complicated by an adverse event. A total of 305 (0·0087%) therapeutic donations occurred while below the lower limit of blood service Hb threshold for their respective genders. Of the donations that occurred below the blood service threshold, 3 of 305 (0·0098%) had an adverse event compared with 362 of 34 581 donations above the lower limit threshold (0·0105%, P = 0·99). The incidence of adverse events was not increased in the group which underwent therapeutic phlebotomy below the current Australian Red Cross Blood Service Hb threshold compared with those above threshold, indicating safety of treatment at Hb levels lower than currently recommended.

摘要

治疗性放血是治疗 HFE 血色病(HH)的基石。目前,澳大利亚红十字会生命血服务指南规定,在放血前测量血红蛋白(Hb)水平,如果男性低于 130g/l 或女性低于 120g/l,则推迟献血者献血。在治疗医生和血液服务医务人员批准的情况下,可在低于这些水平的情况下进行治疗性捐献。目前的研究目的是确定在目前应用于志愿治疗性献血者的 Hb 阈值以下进行治疗性放血时,是否会出现更频繁的不良事件。对 2016-2017 年财政年度的所有治疗性献血进行了回顾性审查。数据通过澳大利亚红十字会血液服务获得。纳入标准为年龄在 16-70 岁之间、体重超过 50kg 且符合血液服务献血标准的任何献血者。从电子质量系统中获得并与供体血红蛋白水平相关的所有记录的不良事件。使用方差分析或 Fisher 确切检验(GraphPad Prism)进行统计分析。在 2016-2017 年期间,约有 34886 次治疗性放血,其中大多数是 HH (34089 次)。共有 365 次/34886 次(0·0105%)献血出现不良事件。共有 305 次/34886 次(0·0087%)献血发生在各自性别血液服务 Hb 阈值下限以下。在低于血液服务阈值的献血中,有 3 例/305 例(0·0098%)发生不良事件,而高于下限阈值的 34581 例/34581 例(0·0105%,P=0·99)发生不良事件。与高于阈值的献血者相比,在低于当前澳大利亚红十字会血液服务 Hb 阈值的情况下进行治疗性放血的献血者不良事件发生率并未增加,表明在低于目前推荐水平的 Hb 水平下进行治疗是安全的。

相似文献

1
Ensuring donor safety: is venesecting therapeutic donors to haemoglobin levels below Blood Service guidelines safe?确保供者安全:将治疗性献血者的血红蛋白水平降至低于血库指南安全吗?
Vox Sang. 2020 May;115(4):288-292. doi: 10.1111/vox.12900. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
Adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds.16和17岁青少年异体全血捐献的不良反应。
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2279-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2279.
4
Frequent platelet apheresis donations in volunteer donors with hemoglobin < 125 g/l are safe and efficient.对于血红蛋白<125 g/l的志愿者捐赠者,频繁进行血小板单采捐献是安全且有效的。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2007 Feb;36(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
5
Relevance of haemoglobin monitoring in apheresis plasma donors: A retrospective cohort study in Québec, Canada.血液成分单采血浆捐献者血红蛋白监测的相关性:加拿大魁北克的一项回顾性队列研究
Vox Sang. 2023 Dec;118(12):1041-1045. doi: 10.1111/vox.13523. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Hemochromatosis subjects as allogeneic blood donors: a prospective study.血色沉着病患者作为异体献血者:一项前瞻性研究。
Transfusion. 2003 Nov;43(11):1538-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00570.x.
7
Plateletpheresis donor deferral patterns at a tertiary care hospital in North India: A need for rethink of haemoglobin cutoff.印度北部一家三级护理医院的血小板单采献血者延期模式:需要重新思考血红蛋白临界值。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2023 May;30(2):268-271. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
8
Blood donation and testosterone replacement therapy.献血与睾酮替代疗法。
Transfusion. 2017 Mar;57(3):578-581. doi: 10.1111/trf.13970. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
10
[Single-donor (apheresis) platelets and pooled whole-blood-derived platelets--significance and assessment of both blood products].[单供体(单采)血小板与混合全血来源血小板——两种血液制品的意义及评估]
Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):S1-39. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.140210.