• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

16和17岁青少年异体全血捐献的不良反应。

Adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds.

作者信息

Eder Anne F, Hillyer Christopher D, Dy Beth A, Notari Edward P, Benjamin Richard J

机构信息

Biomedical Services, Medical Office, National Headquarters, American Red Cross, 2025 E St NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2279-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2279.

DOI:10.1001/jama.299.19.2279
PMID:18492969
Abstract

CONTEXT

Donations by minors (16- and 17-year-olds) now account for approximately 8% of the whole blood collected by the American Red Cross, but young age and first-time donation status are known to be independent risk factors for donation-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds compared with older donors in American Red Cross blood centers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective documentation of adverse events among 16- and 17-year-old donors using standardized collection protocols, definitions, and reporting methods in 2006. Data were from 9 American Red Cross blood centers that routinely collect from 16- and 17-year-olds, a population that provides 80% of its donations at high school blood drives.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of systemic (syncopal-type) and phlebotomy-related donor complications per 10,000 collections.

RESULTS

In 2006, 9 American Red Cross regions collected 145,678 whole blood donations from 16- and 17-year-olds, 113,307 from 18- and 19-year-olds, and 1,517,460 from donors aged 20 years or older. Complications were recorded in 15,632 (10.7%), 9359 (8.3%), and 42,987 (2.8%) donations in each corresponding age group. In a multivariate logistic regression model, young age had the strongest association with complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52-3.69; P < .001), followed by first-time donation status (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.24-3.09; P < .001) and female sex (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.62-2.16; P < .001). Infrequent but medically relevant complications, in particular physical injury from syncope-related falls, were significantly more likely in 16- and 17-year-old donors (86 events; 5.9/10,000 collections) compared with 18- and 19-year-old donors (27 events; 2.4/10,000 collections; OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.61-3.82) or adults aged 20 years or older (62 events; 0.4/10,000 collections; OR, 14.46; 95% CI, 10.43 -20.04). Sixteen-year-old donors who experienced even a minor complication were less likely to return to donate within 12 months than 16-year-olds who experienced uncomplicated donations (52% vs 73% return rate; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.36-0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher incidence of donation-related complications and injury occurs among 16- and 17-year-old blood donors compared with older donors. The increasing dependence on recruiting and retaining young blood donors requires a committed approach to donor safety, especially at high school blood drives.

摘要

背景

未成年人(16岁和17岁)的献血量目前约占美国红十字会采集全血量的8%,但已知年龄小和首次献血状态是与献血相关并发症的独立危险因素。

目的

评估美国红十字会血液中心16岁和17岁的献血者与年龄较大的献血者相比,异体全血献血的不良反应。

设计、地点和参与者:2006年采用标准化采集方案、定义和报告方法对16岁和17岁献血者的不良事件进行前瞻性记录。数据来自9个美国红十字会血液中心,这些中心常规采集16岁和17岁人群的血液,该人群80%的献血是在高中献血活动中进行的。

主要观察指标

每10000次采集的全身(晕厥型)和静脉穿刺相关献血者并发症发生率。

结果

2006年,9个美国红十字会地区从16岁和17岁的献血者中采集了145678次全血,从18岁和19岁的献血者中采集了113307次,从20岁及以上的献血者中采集了1517460次。各相应年龄组中,分别有15632次(10.7%)、9359次(8.3%)和42987次(2.8%)献血记录到并发症。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,年龄小与并发症的关联最强(比值比[OR],3.05;95%置信区间[CI],2.52 - 3.69;P <.001),其次是首次献血状态(OR,2.63;95% CI,2.24 - 3.09;P <.001)和女性性别(OR,1.87;95% CI,1.62 - 2.16;P <.001)。与18岁和19岁的献血者(27例;2.4/10000次采集)或20岁及以上的成年人(62例;0.4/10000次采集)相比,16岁和17岁的献血者发生罕见但与医学相关的并发症,尤其是与晕厥相关跌倒导致的身体损伤的可能性显著更高(86例;5.9/10000次采集;OR,2.48;95% CI,1.61 - 3.82)。经历过哪怕是轻微并发症的16岁献血者在12个月内再次献血的可能性低于经历无并发症献血的16岁献血者(回访率52%对73%;OR,0.40;95% CI,0.36 - 0.44)。

结论

与年龄较大的献血者相比,16岁和17岁的献血者发生与献血相关并发症和损伤的发生率更高。对招募和留住年轻献血者的依赖日益增加,这需要采取切实措施确保献血者安全,尤其是在高中献血活动中。

相似文献

1
Adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds.16和17岁青少年异体全血捐献的不良反应。
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2279-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2279.
2
The relative safety of automated two-unit red blood cell procedures and manual whole-blood collection in young donors.年轻献血者中自动双单位红细胞采集程序与手工全血采集的相对安全性。
Transfusion. 2009 Sep;49(9):1874-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 May 29.
3
The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.美国红十字会献血者血液监测项目:2006年报告的献血并发症
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1809-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
Age-related donor return patterns among first-time blood donors in the United States.美国首次献血者中与年龄相关的献血者回访模式。
Transfusion. 2009 Oct;49(10):2229-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02288.x. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
5
Improving safety for young blood donors.提高年轻献血者的安全性。
Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Jan;26(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
6
Faint and prefaint reactions in whole-blood donors: an analysis of predonation measurements and their predictive value.全血捐献者的轻度和接近轻度反应:献血前检测分析及其预测价值
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1799-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01745.x. Epub 2008 May 14.
7
Regional and temporal variation in American Red Cross blood donations, 1995 to 2005.1995年至2005年美国红十字会血液捐献的地区和时间变化
Transfusion. 2008 Aug;48(8):1576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01755.x. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
8
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections.作为献血者对全血和自动双份红细胞采集反应的函数的献血者保留率。
Transfusion. 2007 Jun;47(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x.
10
Do reactions after whole blood donation predict syncope on return donation?全血捐献后反应能否预测再次捐献时发生晕厥?
Transfusion. 2012 Dec;52(12):2570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03666.x. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Blood Management in Pediatric Patients: Current Strategies and Future Perspectives.儿科患者的患者血液管理:当前策略与未来展望
Turk J Haematol. 2025 Aug 29;42(3):170-180. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2025.2025.0301. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Contemporary use and safety of prepartum autologous blood donation: A retrospective cohort study in Quebec, Canada.产前自体输血的当代应用与安全性:加拿大魁北克的一项回顾性队列研究。
Transfusion. 2025 Jul;65(7):1264-1272. doi: 10.1111/trf.18288. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Frequency of vasovagal reactions in whole blood donation and contributing factors.
全血捐献中血管迷走神经反应的发生率及相关因素。
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Feb 18;5(3):22. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.221. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
4
Predicting vasovagal reactions to needles from video data using 2D-CNN with GRU and LSTM.使用带有门控循环单元(GRU)和长短期记忆网络(LSTM)的二维卷积神经网络(2D-CNN)从视频数据预测对针头的血管迷走神经反应。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0314038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314038. eCollection 2025.
5
Risk factors for vasovagal reactions in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.献血者血管迷走神经反应的危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transfusion. 2025 Jan;65(1):211-223. doi: 10.1111/trf.18078. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
6
Supplemental findings of the 2021 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.2021 年全国采供血情况调查补充结果。
Transfusion. 2023 Oct;63 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S19-S42. doi: 10.1111/trf.17509. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
7
Novel risk patterns of vasovagal reactions in NZ blood donations complicated by COVID-19 restrictions.新型冠状病毒疫情防控限制下新西兰献血中血管迷走性反应的风险模式。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 25;11:1180279. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180279. eCollection 2023.
8
Donor tolerability of convalescent plasma donation.供者接受恢复期血浆捐献的耐受性。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Jun;36(3):429-436. doi: 10.1002/jca.21882. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
Supplemental findings of the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.2017 年全国血液采集与利用情况调查的补充结果。
Transfusion. 2020 Mar;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S17-S37. doi: 10.1111/trf.15715.
10
Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations.风险因素对成人献血相关不良事件的联合影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17758. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017758.