• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口内镜下胃肌切开术(G-POEM)是一种治疗难治性胃轻瘫的有前景的方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising treatment for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yan Jin, Tan Yuyong, Zhou Bingyi, Zhang Shilan, Wang Xuehong, Liu Deliang

机构信息

Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital. Central South University, China.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020 Mar;112(3):219-228. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.6559/2019.

DOI:10.17235/reed.2020.6559/2019
PMID:32081015
Abstract

AIM

to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched and used for study inclusion. Clinical studies since January 2013 to October 2019 were identified as suitable for inclusion. Conference papers, review articles, case reports, animal studies, letters, studies with repetitive data, studies that did not mention the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score/gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) hours or were not indicated in the standard form were excluded. GCSI score, GCSI reduction, gastric emptying scintigraphy at four hours (GES-4h) and GES time (GET) reduction were considered as major indexes and the meta-analysis was achieved using Review Manager 5.3. Research bias was measured according to Cochrane handbook.

RESULTS

nine studies were included with a total of 235 patients that underwent G-POEM, and the technical success rate was 100%. After G-POEM, patients reported changes in GCSI score (6/9 studies, mean difference 1.41 [CI: 0.93, 1.88], p < 0.0001), GCSI reduction (8/9 studies, odds ratio 3.00 [CI: 2.24, 4.03], p < 0.0001), GES-4h (8/9 studies, mean difference 23.78 [CI: 19.88, 27.68], p < 0.00001) and GET reduction (6/9 studies, odds ratio 3.50 [CI: 2.12, 5.78], p < 0.00001). The intra-procedure complication rate was 5.1% (12/235), including capnoperitoneum (seven cases) and accidental mucotomy (five cases). The post-procedure complication rate was 6.8% (16/235), including abdominal pain (three cases), bleeding (three cases), ulcer (one case), difficulty swallowing (one case) and others (eight cases). Both per- and post-procedure complications were easily managed by conservative or endoscopic treatments.

CONCLUSION

the results show that gastroparesis patients can benefit from G-POEM, the success rate was impressive and the complication rate was relatively low. However, caution is necessary when interpreting the results, primarily due to the limitations of uncontrolled studies. Randomized control studies are still needed for further evaluations.

摘要

目的

评估经口内镜下胃肌切开术(G-POEM)治疗难治性胃轻瘫的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库并用于纳入研究。确定2013年1月至2019年10月期间的临床研究适合纳入。排除会议论文、综述文章、病例报告、动物研究、信函、有重复数据的研究、未提及胃轻瘫主要症状指数(GCSI)评分/胃排空闪烁扫描(GES)小时数或未按标准格式注明的研究。将GCSI评分、GCSI降低值、4小时胃排空闪烁扫描(GES-4h)和GES时间(GET)降低值作为主要指标,并使用Review Manager 5.3进行荟萃分析。根据Cochrane手册测量研究偏倚。

结果

纳入9项研究,共235例接受G-POEM治疗的患者,技术成功率为100%。G-POEM术后,患者的GCSI评分(6/9项研究,平均差值1.41[CI:0.93,1.88],p<0.0001)、GCSI降低值(8/9项研究,比值比3.00[CI:2.24,4.03],p<0.0001)、GES-4h(8/9项研究,平均差值23.78[CI:19.88,27.68],p<0.00001)和GET降低值(6/9项研究,比值比3.50[CI:2.12,5.78],p<0.00001)均有变化。术中并发症发生率为5.1%(12/235),包括气腹(7例)和意外黏膜切开(5例)。术后并发症发生率为6.8%(16/235),包括腹痛(3例)、出血(3例)、溃疡(1例)、吞咽困难(1例)和其他(8例)。术中及术后并发症均易于通过保守或内镜治疗处理。

结论

结果表明胃轻瘫患者可从G-POEM中获益,成功率令人印象深刻,并发症发生率相对较低。然而,在解释结果时需要谨慎,主要是由于非对照研究的局限性。仍需要进行随机对照研究以作进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising treatment for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下胃肌切开术(G-POEM)是一种治疗难治性胃轻瘫的有前景的方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020 Mar;112(3):219-228. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.6559/2019.
2
Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) as a Treatment for Refractory Gastroparesis: Long-Term Outcomes.胃经口内镜肌切开术(G-POEM)治疗难治性胃轻瘫:长期疗效。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 22;2018:6409698. doi: 10.1155/2018/6409698. eCollection 2018.
3
Peroral Pyloromytomy is Effective and Safe for Postsurgical Gastroparesis.经口幽门肌切开术治疗术后胃轻瘫安全有效。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jun;24(6):1417-1420. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04558-x. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Clinical efficacy of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis and predictors of outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis using surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group.经口内镜下胃肌切开术(G-POEM)治疗难治性胃瘫的临床疗效及结局预测因素:以手术幽门成形术为对照组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3352-3367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07135-9. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
5
Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: a multicenter international experience.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗难治性胃轻瘫:多中心国际经验。
Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1053-1058. doi: 10.1055/a-0596-7199. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for refractory gastroparesis: results from an international prospective trial.胃经口内镜肌切开术(G-POEM)治疗难治性胃轻瘫:一项国际前瞻性试验的结果。
Gut. 2022 Jan;71(1):25-33. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322756. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy with antropyloromyotomy in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: clinical experience with follow-up and scintigraphic evaluation (with video).经口内镜胃肌切开术联合幽门肌切开术治疗难治性胃轻瘫:随访和闪烁扫描评估的临床经验(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.050. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Gastric per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Meta-Analysis.经口内镜下胃肌切开术治疗难治性胃瘫:一项荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May;25(5):1108-1116. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04520-x. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for postsurgical gastroparesis: a single-center and retrospective study of a prospective database.胃经口内镜肌切开术(G-POEM)治疗术后胃瘫的可行性、安全性和长期疗效:前瞻性数据库的单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3459-3470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07793-0. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
One-year results of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a French multicenter study.胃经口内镜肌切开术治疗难治性胃轻瘫的 1 年结果:一项法国多中心研究。
Endoscopy. 2021 May;53(5):480-490. doi: 10.1055/a-1205-5686. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic treatment modalities for the management of gastroparesis: a critical review.用于胃轻瘫治疗的内镜治疗方式:一项批判性综述。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul-Aug;38(4):353-363. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0982. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Role of balloon dilation test in identifying suitable candidates for gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy.球囊扩张试验在确定适合经口内镜下胃肌切开术患者中的作用
DEN Open. 2025 Jan 15;5(1):e70049. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70049. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of the status and trends of gastroparesis research.
全球胃轻瘫研究现状与趋势的文献计量学可视化分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Nov 28;28(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01537-1.
4
Research hotspots and trend of a emerging novel endoscopic technique of peroral endoscopic myotomy from 2010 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis.2010 年至 2022 年经口内镜下肌切开术这一新兴内镜技术的研究热点和趋势:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e35009. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035009.
5
Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus pyloric injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of gastroparesis: our institutional experience and a systematic review of the literature.胃经口内镜肌切开术与肉毒杆菌毒素幽门注射治疗胃轻瘫:我们的机构经验和文献系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7280-7287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10262-z. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) in patients with refractory gastroparesis: a review.难治性胃轻瘫患者的经口内镜下幽门肌切开术(G-POEM):综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 26;16:17562848231151289. doi: 10.1177/17562848231151289. eCollection 2023.
7
Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Gastroparesis: the Current Approach to Management.胃电刺激治疗难治性胃轻瘫:当前的管理方法。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2021 Jan 22;23(2):2. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00803-0.