Dimitrova Lora, Fernando Vinuri, Vissia Eline M, Nijenhuis Ellert R S, Draijer Nel, Reinders Antje A T S
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 13;11(1):1705599. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1705599. eCollection 2020.
: Two aetiology models for dissociative identity disorder (DID) have been proposed, namely a childhood Trauma Model and an iatrogenic or Fantasy model. A recent study indicated that sleep disturbances underlie dissociative symptomatology. : Our current study aims to test whether this finding can be replicated in an independent sample and to investigate if this finding still holds after correcting for childhood and adult traumatization. An experimental working memory task is included to investigate how sleep disturbance, traumatization, dissociation, and fantasy proneness impact cognitive functioning. : Three groups of participants were included - individuals with DID, individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and matched healthy controls. Sleep disturbances were measured and compared between the groups along with measures of childhood and adult traumatization, psychoform and somatoform [psychological and somatic] dissociative symptoms, and fantasy proneness. Cognitive capacity was assessed using a working memory task. : When controlled for traumatic experiences, sleep disturbances did not predict dissociative symptoms. When controlled for sleep disturbance and fantasy proneness, childhood traumatization did predict dissociative symptoms. Psychoform dissociative symptoms correlated with traumatic experiences more than with fantasy proneness. Working memory performance was similar among the participating groups. Propensity to fantasy did not discriminate individuals with DID and PTSD, and was a weak predictor of dissociative symptoms. : Whereas DID and PTSD are associated with sleep disturbances, these features do not statistically predict dissociative symptoms in these disorders when traumatic experiences are taken into account. Fantasy proneness is not excessive in DID and PTSD. Hence, we found no evidence that sleep disturbances, propensity to fantasy and abnormal working memory capacity explain dissociative symptoms in DID and PTSD. In sum, the relationship between sleep and dissociative symptoms disappeared when potentially traumatizing events were controlled for.
针对分离性身份障碍(DID),已提出两种病因模型,即童年创伤模型和医源性或幻想模型。最近一项研究表明,睡眠障碍是分离症状的基础。我们当前的研究旨在检验这一发现能否在一个独立样本中得到重复验证,并调查在对童年和成年期创伤进行校正后这一发现是否仍然成立。纳入了一项实验性工作记忆任务,以研究睡眠障碍、创伤、分离以及幻想倾向如何影响认知功能。纳入了三组参与者——分离性身份障碍患者、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者以及匹配的健康对照者。对各组之间的睡眠障碍进行了测量和比较,同时还测量了童年和成年期创伤、心理形式和躯体形式(心理和躯体)分离症状以及幻想倾向。使用工作记忆任务评估认知能力。在控制创伤经历后,睡眠障碍并不能预测分离症状。在控制睡眠障碍和幻想倾向后,童年创伤确实能预测分离症状。心理形式的分离症状与创伤经历的相关性高于与幻想倾向的相关性。参与组之间的工作记忆表现相似。幻想倾向并不能区分分离性身份障碍患者和创伤后应激障碍患者,并且是分离症状的一个弱预测指标。虽然分离性身份障碍和创伤后应激障碍与睡眠障碍有关,但在考虑创伤经历时,这些特征在统计学上并不能预测这些障碍中的分离症状。分离性身份障碍和创伤后应激障碍患者的幻想倾向并不过度。因此,我们没有发现证据表明睡眠障碍、幻想倾向和异常工作记忆能力可以解释分离性身份障碍和创伤后应激障碍中的分离症状。总之,在控制了潜在的创伤性事件后,睡眠与分离症状之间的关系消失了。