Duong Minh, Shumaker Ellen Thomas, Cates Sheryl C, Shelley Lisa, Goodson Lydia, Bernstein Christopher, Lavallee Aaron, Kirchner Margaret, Goulter Rebecca, Jaykus Lee-Ann, Chapman Benjamin
Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607.
Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
J Food Prot. 2020 Jul 1;83(7):1167-1174. doi: 10.4315/JFP-19-594.
The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an intervention for consumer thermometer use by using a randomized experimental design and direct observation of meal preparation. The study was conducted in test kitchen facilities in two locations in North Carolina (one urban and one rural). Cameras recorded participants' actions at various locations throughout the kitchen and recorded the meal preparation from beginning to end. Before preparing the meal, a randomized treatment group watched a 3-min U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) food safety video "The Importance of Cooking to a Safe Internal Temperature and How to Use a Food Thermometer." Participants in the control and treatment groups were observed while cooking turkey burgers and preparing a salad to determine whether a thermometer was used to check the doneness of the turkey patties. Following meal preparation, all participants responded to a postobservation interview about food handling behaviors. Treatment group participants were also asked about the intervention. A total of 383 people participated in the study (201 in the control group and 182 in the treatment group). Participants who viewed the video were twice as likely to use a thermometer to check the doneness of the turkey patties compared with the participants who were not exposed to the video (75 versus 34%) and twice as likely to place the thermometer in the correct location (52 versus 23%). Sixty-seven percent of participants who watched the video reported that it influenced their behavior in the kitchen. This study demonstrates the importance of timing and framing of a behavioral intervention for thermometer use and highlights considerations for the development of additional messages (e.g., proper insertion).
本研究旨在通过随机实验设计和对膳食准备过程的直接观察,测试一项针对消费者使用体温计的干预措施的有效性。该研究在北卡罗来纳州两个地点的测试厨房设施中进行(一个城市地点和一个农村地点)。摄像机记录了参与者在厨房各个位置的行动,并从头到尾记录了膳食准备过程。在准备膳食之前,一个随机分组的治疗组观看了一段3分钟的美国农业部(USDA)食品安全视频《烹饪至安全内部温度的重要性以及如何使用食物温度计》。在烹饪火鸡汉堡和准备沙拉时,观察了对照组和治疗组的参与者,以确定他们是否使用温度计检查火鸡肉饼的熟度。在膳食准备完成后,所有参与者都回答了关于食品处理行为的观察后访谈问题。还询问了治疗组参与者关于干预措施的情况。共有383人参与了该研究(对照组201人,治疗组182人)。观看视频的参与者使用温度计检查火鸡肉饼熟度的可能性是未观看视频参与者的两倍(75%对34%),将温度计放置在正确位置的可能性也是两倍(52%对23%)。观看视频的参与者中有67%报告称该视频影响了他们在厨房中的行为。本研究证明了体温计使用行为干预的时机和框架的重要性,并突出了开发其他信息(如正确插入)时的注意事项。