• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线食品安全教育项目的有效性:系统评价、随机效应荟萃分析和主题综合

Effectiveness of Online Food-Safety Educational Programs: A Systematic Review, Random-Effects Meta-Analysis, and Thematic Synthesis.

作者信息

Berglund Zachary, Simsek Senay, Feng Yaohua

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Purdue University, 745 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Mar 4;13(5):794. doi: 10.3390/foods13050794.

DOI:10.3390/foods13050794
PMID:38472907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10931379/
Abstract

Online food-safety educational programs are increasingly important to educate different populations as technology and culture shift to using more technology. However, the broad effectiveness of these programs has yet to be examined. A systematic review, random-effects meta-analysis, and thematic synthesis are conducted to identify the effect size of online food-safety educational programs on knowledge, attitudes, and practices of consumers, food workers, and students and their respective barriers and recommendations. Online food-safety education was found to be of moderate and low effectiveness, with attitudes being the lowest in all populations. Consumers struggled with staying focused, and it was found that messaging should focus on risk communication. Students struggled with social isolation and a lack of time, and it was recommended that videos be used. Food workers struggled with a lack of time for training and difficulty understanding the material, and future programs are recommended to implement shorter but more frequent trainings with simple language. Future online food-safety educational programs should focus on incorporating social elements, as they can remain a huge barrier to learning. They should also focus on changing the participant's attitude to risk perception and beliefs in the importance of food safety.

摘要

随着技术和文化向更多地使用技术转变,在线食品安全教育项目对于教育不同人群变得越来越重要。然而,这些项目的广泛有效性尚未得到检验。本研究进行了系统评价、随机效应荟萃分析和主题综合分析,以确定在线食品安全教育项目对消费者、食品工作者和学生的知识、态度和行为的效应大小,以及他们各自面临的障碍和建议。研究发现,在线食品安全教育的有效性中等偏低,在所有人群中态度方面的效果最差。消费者难以保持专注,研究发现信息传递应侧重于风险沟通。学生面临社交隔离和时间不足的问题,建议使用视频。食品工作者面临培训时间不足和理解材料困难的问题,建议未来的项目采用简短但更频繁的培训,使用简单易懂的语言。未来的在线食品安全教育项目应注重融入社交元素,因为社交元素可能仍然是学习的巨大障碍。它们还应注重改变参与者对风险认知的态度以及对食品安全重要性的信念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14de/10931379/622a0eac7505/foods-13-00794-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14de/10931379/622a0eac7505/foods-13-00794-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14de/10931379/622a0eac7505/foods-13-00794-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Online Food-Safety Educational Programs: A Systematic Review, Random-Effects Meta-Analysis, and Thematic Synthesis.在线食品安全教育项目的有效性:系统评价、随机效应荟萃分析和主题综合
Foods. 2024 Mar 4;13(5):794. doi: 10.3390/foods13050794.
2
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
Meta-analysis of food safety training on hand hygiene knowledge and attitudes among food handlers.食品安全培训对手工卫生知识和食品处理人员态度的meta 分析。
J Food Prot. 2012 Apr;75(4):793-804. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-502.
7
Moving Forward to the Future: A Review of Microbial Food Safety Education in China.迈向未来:中国微生物食品安全教育综述。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2021 Aug;18(8):547-566. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2889. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
A Systematic Review on the Usability of Web-Based Applications in Advocating Consumers on Food Safety.关于基于网络的应用程序在向消费者宣传食品安全方面可用性的系统评价
Foods. 2022 Jan 3;11(1):115. doi: 10.3390/foods11010115.
9
Effectiveness of Digital Education on Communication Skills Among Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.数字教育对医学生沟通技能的有效性:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 27;21(8):e12967. doi: 10.2196/12967.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Certified Food Safety Management Systems Assessed through the Lenses of Food Safety Culture and of Control: A Pilot Study.通过食品安全文化和控制视角评估的认证食品安全管理体系:一项试点研究。
Foods. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):2759. doi: 10.3390/foods13172759.

本文引用的文献

1
The university students' self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education.大学生在远程教育中的自我调节努力、灵活性和满意度。
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2022;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00342-w. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Food safety practice and associated factors in public food establishments of Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚公共餐饮服务机构食品安全实践及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0268918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268918. eCollection 2022.
3
Food hygiene practices and determinants among food handlers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
埃塞俄比亚食品从业人员的食品卫生习惯及影响因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Trop Med Health. 2022 May 19;50(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41182-022-00423-6.
4
Participants' evaluation of an online international food safety short course.参与者对在线国际食品安全短期课程的评价。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Jun;92:102089. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102089. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Food safety related efficacy beliefs, behaviors, beliefs in myths, and the effects of educational online interventions: Data from an online survey experiment with 1,973 consumers from Norway and the UK.与食品安全相关的功效信念、行为、对谣言的信念以及在线教育干预的效果:来自对挪威和英国1973名消费者的在线调查实验的数据。
Data Brief. 2022 Mar 26;42:108102. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108102. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
An Evaluation of a Virtual Food Safety Program for Low-Income Families: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior.针对低收入家庭的虚拟食品安全计划评估:应用计划行为理论
Foods. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):355. doi: 10.3390/foods11030355.
7
Food safety knowledge, attitudes, and eating behavior in the advent of the global coronavirus pandemic.全球冠状病毒大流行时期的食品安全知识、态度和饮食行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261832. eCollection 2021.
8
The effects of online education on academic success: A meta-analysis study.在线教育对学业成就的影响:一项元分析研究。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(1):429-450. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10740-8. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
A quasi-experimental study on the effect of health and food safety training intervention on restaurant food handlers during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于新冠疫情期间健康与食品安全培训干预对餐饮从业人员影响的准实验研究。
Food Sci Nutr. 2021 May 20;9(7):3655-3663. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2326. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.