Suppr超能文献

电子烟的成本:来自四国家庭吸烟和电子烟调查的证据。

Costs of vaping: evidence from ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, Governors State University, University Park, Illinois, USA

Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):94-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055344. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the prices paid for nicotine vaping products (NVPs) and supplies among current NVP users to prices paid for cigarettes among current smokers.

DATA

The 2016 International Tobacco Control Four Country Vaping and Smoking Survey (4CV1). Key measures included: (1) self-reported prices paid for reusable NVPs (eg, rechargeable devices with cartridges and tank system devices with e-liquids) in the 3-month period prior to the survey among current NVP users, (2) prices paid for disposable NVPs, cartridges and e-liquids purchased in the last 30 days among current NVP users and (3) self-reported prices paid for cigarettes among current smokers.

RESULTS

Disposable NVP price was higher than the price of a comparable unit for combustible cigarettes in England (EN), USA and Canada (CA). Prefilled cartridge price was higher than the price of a comparable unit of cigarettes in USA and CA, but lower in EN and Australia. E-liquid price was consistently lower than the price of a comparable unit of cigarettes across four countries. For start-up costs, price of a rechargeable device is approximately 3-5 times higher than a pack of cigarettes in four countries.

CONCLUSION

NVP prices were generally higher than prices of combustible cigarettes, especially the high upfront NVP devices. The high upfront costs of purchasing a reusable NVP may discourage some smokers from switching to vaping. However, the average lower costs of cartridges and e-liquids relative to a package of cigarettes make switching to a NVP an attractive alternative to smoking in the long term so long as smokers switch completely to vaping.

摘要

研究目的

比较当前尼古丁电子烟(NVP)使用者购买 NVP 产品和用品的价格与当前吸烟者购买香烟的价格。

数据

2016 年国际烟草控制四国电子烟与吸烟调查(4CV1)。主要措施包括:(1)调查前 3 个月内当前 NVP 用户报告的可重复使用 NVP(如带墨盒的可充电设备和带电子液体的罐式系统设备)价格;(2)当前 NVP 用户在过去 30 天内购买的一次性 NVP、墨盒和电子液体的价格;(3)当前吸烟者报告的购买香烟的价格。

结果

一次性 NVP 的价格高于英国(EN)、美国和加拿大(CA)可比单位的可燃香烟价格。预填充墨盒的价格高于美国和加拿大可比单位的香烟价格,但在 EN 和澳大利亚较低。电子液体的价格在四个国家都始终低于可比单位香烟的价格。对于初始成本,可充电设备的价格约为四个国家一包香烟的 3-5 倍。

结论

NVP 的价格普遍高于可燃香烟的价格,尤其是一次性高成本设备。购买可重复使用的 NVP 的高初始成本可能会阻止一些吸烟者转向电子烟。然而,与一包香烟相比,墨盒和电子液体的平均较低成本使长期完全转向电子烟成为吸烟的一个有吸引力的替代选择,只要吸烟者完全转向电子烟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370e/7803891/68461f7fc2e8/tobaccocontrol-2019-055344f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验