Cho Ara, Scollo Michelle, Chan Gary, Driezen Pete, Hyland Andrew, Shang Ce, Gartner Coral E
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
The NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, The University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Tob Control. 2025 Apr 1;34(2):183-191. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058130.
We examined Australian tobacco purchasing trends, the average self-reported price paid within each purchase type and the association between type of tobacco product purchased and participant characteristics, including quit intentions, between 2007 and 2020.
We analysed data collected from adults who smoked factory-made and/or roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in nine waves (2007-2020) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Australia Survey (n=5452, n=11 534). The main outcome measures were type of tobacco products purchased: RYO, carton, pack or pouch size and brand segment. Logistic regression, fit using generalised estimating equations, was estimated the association between the outcome and participant characteristics.
The reported price-minimising purchasing patterns increased from 2007 to 2020: any RYO (23.8-43.9%), large-sized pack (2007: 24.0% to 2016: 34.3%); shifting from large-sized to small-sized packs (2020: 37.7%), and economy brand (2007: 37.2% to 2020: 59.3%); shifting from large (2007: 55.8%) to small economy packs (2014: 15.3% to 2020: 48.1%). Individuals with a lower income, a higher nicotine dependence level and no quit intention were more likely to purchase RYO and large-sized packs.
RYO, large-sized packs and products with a low upfront cost (eg, small RYO pouches and small-sized economy brand packs) may appeal to people on low incomes. Australia's diverse tobacco pack and pouch sizes allow the tobacco industry to influence tobacco purchases. Standardising pack and pouch sizes may reduce some price-related marketing and especially benefit people who have a low income, are highly addicted and have no quit intention.
我们研究了2007年至2020年期间澳大利亚的烟草购买趋势、每种购买类型中自我报告的平均支付价格,以及购买的烟草产品类型与参与者特征(包括戒烟意愿)之间的关联。
我们分析了从参与澳大利亚国际烟草控制政策评估项目调查九轮(2007 - 2020年)的成年吸烟者中收集的数据,这些吸烟者吸食机制卷烟和/或手卷烟(n = 5452,n = 11534)。主要结局指标为购买的烟草产品类型:手卷烟、条装、盒装或小包装尺寸以及品牌类别。使用广义估计方程进行逻辑回归,以估计结局与参与者特征之间的关联。
从2007年到2020年,报告的使价格最小化的购买模式有所增加:任何手卷烟(23.8% - 43.9%)、大包装(2007年:24.0%至2016年:34.3%);从大包装转向小包装(2020年:37.7%),以及经济型品牌(2007年:37.2%至2020年:59.3%);从大包装(2007年:55.8%)转向小经济型包装(2014年:15.3%至2020年:48.1%)。收入较低、尼古丁依赖水平较高且无戒烟意愿的个体更有可能购买手卷烟和大包装。
手卷烟、大包装以及前期成本较低的产品(如小手卷烟袋和小尺寸经济型品牌包装)可能对低收入人群有吸引力。澳大利亚多样的烟草包装和袋尺寸使烟草行业能够影响烟草购买。标准化包装和袋尺寸可能会减少一些与价格相关的营销,尤其有益于低收入、高度成瘾且无戒烟意愿的人群。