Mitchell Megan M, Hudson Caleb C, Beale Brian S
Animal Specialty Group, Los Angeles, California.
Gulf Coast Veterinary Specialists, Houston, Texas.
Vet Surg. 2020 May;49(4):787-793. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13391. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
To compare femoral stem subsidence and determine contributing factors in dogs undergoing total hip replacement (THR) with the traditional BFX, collared BFX, and BFX lateral bolt stems.
Retrospective radiographic study.
Ninety-three dogs with 101 THR including dogs undergoing THR with a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem (n = 40), BFX collared stem (n = 21), and traditional BFX stem (n = 40).
Radiographs of traditional BFX (n = 40), collared BFX (n = 21), and BFX lateral bolt (n = 40) THR performed from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Subsidence, canal flare index (CFI), stem canal fill (CF), stem orientation, and complications confirmed on radiographs were recorded at postoperative and recheck radiographs. Analysis of variance tests were used to compare subsidence, CFI, stem orientation, and CF. A χ analysis was performed to compare complication rates between groups.
Subsidence was lower after placement of BFX lateral bolt stems (median, 0.24 mm; interquartile range [IQR; 1.49) compared with collared (1.27 mm [2.29]) and BFX (1.35 mm [2.26]) stems. No difference in subsidence was detected between collared and BFX implants. Coronal CF was greater after placement of BFX (mean ± SD, 0.72 ± 0.06) compared with lateral bolt (0.69 ± 0.05) or collared (0.66 ± 0.07) stems. Sagittal CF differed between all groups (BFX 0.7 ± 0.05, lateral bolt 0.67 ± 0.06, and collared 0.61 ± 0.06). No differences were identified in CFI or stem orientation in the coronal and sagittal planes or in complication rates between implants.
The BFX lateral bolt femoral stem was associated with less postoperative subsidence compared with the BFX collared and traditional BFX stems. No consistent changes in CF, CFI, or stem orientation or complication rates were identified in association with increased subsidence in this study.
Implantation of a lateral bolt femoral stem should be considered during THR to prevent subsidence.
比较接受全髋关节置换术(THR)的犬使用传统BFX、带颈BFX和BFX侧栓柄时的股骨柄下沉情况,并确定相关影响因素。
回顾性放射学研究。
93只犬接受了101次全髋关节置换术,其中包括使用BFX侧栓股骨柄(n = 40)、带颈BFX柄(n = 21)和传统BFX柄(n = 40)进行全髋关节置换术的犬。
回顾2015年至2018年进行的传统BFX(n = 40)、带颈BFX(n = 21)和BFX侧栓(n = 40)全髋关节置换术的X线片。记录术后及复查X线片时的下沉情况、髓腔扩张指数(CFI)、柄髓腔填充情况(CF)、柄的方向以及X线片上确认的并发症。采用方差分析来比较下沉情况、CFI、柄的方向和CF。进行χ分析以比较各组之间的并发症发生率。
与带颈柄(1.27mm [2.29])和BFX柄(1.35mm [2.26])相比,使用BFX侧栓柄后的下沉情况更低(中位数,0.24mm;四分位间距[IQR];1.49)。带颈柄和BFX植入物之间未检测到下沉差异。与侧栓柄(0.69±0.05)或带颈柄(0.66±0.07)相比,使用BFX柄后的冠状面CF更大(平均值±标准差,0.72±0.06)。矢状面CF在所有组之间存在差异(BFX为0.7±0.05,侧栓柄为0.67±0.06,带颈柄为0.61±0.06)。在冠状面和矢状面的CFI、柄的方向或植入物之间的并发症发生率方面未发现差异。
与BFX带颈柄和传统BFX柄相比,BFX侧栓股骨柄术后下沉情况更少。在本研究中,未发现与下沉增加相关的CF、CFI、柄的方向或并发症发生率的一致变化。
在全髋关节置换术中应考虑植入侧栓股骨柄以防止下沉。